Gobsmacked by RCVS reply

hachette

WTFH wrote: »

I call bluff.

If it was being considered by a magazine, unless they were offering you money, you would want to shout it from the roof tops, not hide it away.

Is it a bluff?

WTFH

hachette wrote: »

This is a response received from the magazine editor:

... if you would like us to send your email on to the College for a comment so we can publish both in our Postbag, please do let me know.

Best wishes,


Acting editor

That's how I know.
They want to send the email you sent them to the RCVS. Then they will contact the RCVS for a response - they aren't going to accept what you claim they said. If the RCVS replies then they might post both on their letters page.

peachyprice

hachette wrote: »

And you know all that. Wowww

Hachette, no way, no how, are they going to publish a story concerning an ongoing legal battle. Not going to happen.

Oli.s

Is it dogs today magazine, as posted by you in your other thread......

http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.php?p=64629567&postcount=462

It seems I have attracted attention of Dogs Today magazine. RCVS are making some proposal to new Royal Charter and I was advised to submit mine. The editor also said that they will be sending my e-mail with its enclosures to the RCVS for their comments as well as discuss this with me before their next issue. So maybe, just maybe some changes will happen.

WTFH

Oli.s wrote: »

Is it dogs today magazine, as posted by you in your other thread......

http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.php?p=64629567&postcount=462

You mean the other threads are still running? I thought they had been closed down, hence the "need" to start yet another thread about the same thing.

QuackQuackOops

hachette wrote: »

RCVS replied with no answers because they have not got any answers. Why? I think my questions were simple enough. How can it end while there is no end? Shall I just walk away? Don't think so.

Yes, you need to walk away.

Your dog is gone, its very sad and it may be the result of a mistake or even two mistakes.

People do make mistakes. Doctors, vets, dentists, nurses, police, you! We all make mistakes that sometimes result in tragedy however it does not always mean someone should lose their career, job and livelihood.

You are emotional and unable to accept closure due to mistakes but your dog is not coming back and the RCVS will never agree with you, no matter how many sarcastic and childish emails you write.

So yes, walk away and remember your dog for the loving pet he was.

QuackQuackOops

hachette wrote: »

Are you qualified to suggest this treatment?

Youre questioning this posters 'qualifications' to suggest therapy?

Yet you appear to be 'qualified' enough to determine whether a Vet should be struck off.

WTFH

QuackQuackOops wrote: »

Youre questioning this posters 'qualifications' to suggest therapy?

Yet you appear to be 'qualified' enough to determine whether a Vet should be struck off.

I got reported for saying that earlier and had post(s) deleted. The truth isn't welcome on this thread.

Pollycat

WTFH wrote: »

You mean the other threads are still running? I thought they had been closed down, hence the "need" to start yet another thread about the same thing.

The thread that was originally on the Praise, Vent, Warnings board was moved to the Pet board - that is still running.

Then the OP started this thread on the Praise, Vent, Warnings board and it was also moved to the Pet board.

I personally think the 2 threads should be merged as this is a continuation of the same issue.

meritaten

hachette - I have read your original thread and while I have every sympathy, and in fact, think you are right in that the vet was incompetent - you cant win. Simply because her professional organisation are backing HER. some battles just cannot be won. and I think this is one of them.
I am so sorry, but, I think you have done as much as you can and its time to put it behind you. you are wasting energy persueing this. why not put it to better use by campaigning for tighter controls on veterinary practices?