Ouija boards

Retrogamer

madjay wrote: »

Not being there you have no evidance to conclude it was 100% cold reading like wise there is no evidance to conclude it was 100% Paranormal. Your conclusion is only base on third party information and what you have read on the subject. There is people who like to believe they have Paranormal power and are fake but these do not help anyone but themselves.. The are also people who have had real unexplained thing happen to them. It is not down you to tell them what they have not see or heard but to repect their opions. Would you tell a bishop there is no God and he has wasted his life.

I'm not telling anyone to believe anything.
I respect people's right to their opinion, but if the actual opinion is silly, of course i won't respect it.

I'm only pointing out that it's rational to put it down to cold reading because they'res plently evidence of that.

It's not rational to put it down to something paranormal as there's no evidence of paranormal things existing.

I guess it depends if you beleive stuff is true because it feels nice, or if you beleive in stuff that's more likely to be true (i.e cold reading)