We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

No toys or blankets in allowed in cot as they can cause cot deaths?

Options
I recently went to New York to visit my son daughter in law and 18th month old grand daughter. I took with me a hand crocheted cot blanket. My dil has previously turned down cot "bumpers" as a safety risk and now she told me that the latest advice from US paediatricians was that there should be no blankets or toys in a child's cot as these placed the baby at risk of a cot death. Is this also true in the UK? It seems to make the baby's cot a pretty grim place to be :(
«13456710

Comments

  • clairec79
    clairec79 Posts: 2,512 Forumite
    The bumpers advice holds true here (and has been for at least 13 years - shops still sell them though

    Not the bit about blankets or toys, but just to make sure the baby can't accidentally get trapped under anything
  • cte1111
    cte1111 Posts: 7,390 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    If they're using sleeping bags, then probably the baby doesn't need any other bedding. The guidelines do advise not to have any toys, pillows or other soft objects in the cot.
  • Bennifred
    Bennifred Posts: 3,986 Forumite
    clairec79 wrote: »
    The bumpers advice holds true here (and has been for at least 13 years - shops still sell them though
    ........................

    I remember the "no bumpers" advice from 25 years ago!.......
    [
  • Spendless
    Spendless Posts: 24,649 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I never used to put toys in my babies cots either- mine are 13 and 10. I was always concerned they could wriggle their way to have their face pressed up against a soft toy but not be able to wriggle their way out of it.
  • Alikay
    Alikay Posts: 5,147 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Bennifred wrote: »
    I remember the "no bumpers" advice from 25 years ago!.......

    Me too. My granddaughter has always stayed lovely and cosy in her growbag, even if the cot did look a bit stark. Toys in the cot aren't a great idea once they are able to pull themselves up to standing anyway as they are used as steps to escape with!

    The crochet blanket will still be useful for car journeys and snuggling up on the sofa with. My children all had their own special little blankets, and getting those out of the cupboard was the first thing we did when any of them were ill, right through to their teens.
  • con1888
    con1888 Posts: 1,847 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    I didn't know the no bumpers thing, though I don't have any kids yet.

    Pregnant atm though and this is the first I have come across it, glad I have as it saves me time and money looking for some if they are a no-no.
  • To be honest, it is good advice. There is no need for lots of fluffy toys and extra blankets. Guidance in UK is the less the better really.... if not using sleeping bags, then basic blankets and sheets are sufficent. Does it really matter? Sure she could use it in the pram etc.....

    :cool:
    Baldrick, does it have to be this way? Our valued friendship ending with me cutting you up into strips and telling the prince that you walked over a very sharp cattle grid in an extremely heavy hat?
  • usignuolo
    usignuolo Posts: 1,923 Forumite
    edited 27 October 2013 at 9:29PM
    My son as a toddler had a panel toy which screwed onto the side of his cot with lot of lights and sounds he could press and a little mirror , and another where he could play little tunes and he also had a toy hanging on the side whose string he could pull and its arms and legs flapped up and down. Plus he had a soft cuddly toy in the shape of a small dog which went everywhere with him including to bed. He loved these and played with them for ages when he woke up instead of crying to be entertained.

    As soon as my granddaughter wakes she demands to be played with. Their household is entirely run around the little girl at present, they have no life at all outside catering to her demands. There is another one on the way so I wonder how they will cope. I suppose I am old fashioned, but I do feel some sense of proportion is being lost here and I wonder if a generation of children is growing up who will so cossetted and protected from all potential danger that it will stifle a desire to explore and an adventurous spirit.

    My dil is quite highly strung and I think all this emphasis on what might happen to the baby if she does not follow all the guidance to the letter is having rather a negative impact on her. Her mother agrees with me by the way. She was one of 8 and says they had to get on with their own entertainment a lot of the time. Her mother would never have had time to fuss over and indulge them all like this.
  • Its not really to do with fuss or indulgance... its more to do with a LOT of research into what MAY cause cot death and/or infant suffocation...

    There plenty of things that were done "back in the day"... just because people survived, should we simply ignore modern research and fact because of this??

    For example: we didn't wear seatbelts "back in the day". We didn't all die, admittedly, but if we had a crash without a belt on, its more likely that the result would have been fatal.

    Another, is the more recent issue with blind cords. Ask one of the parents of children who have been strangled whether they wish that they had taken safety advice more seriously and simply popped a blind cleat on the wall to reduce the risk......

    I would agree that these days, sometimes health & safety do seem to have gone a bit overboard.... but if its a case of preventing risks which are proven by research to have a possible fatal effect on my child and I am afraid that I will go with fact and not "what my mums generation used to do".....

    Oh and yes - a plastic flat toy which makes noises on the side of the cot would be fine. Not so sure about something with a string in a bed with an unsupervised child who could at best, wrap it round their finger and cause blood loss and at worse, possibly strangly themselves (dependant of course on how long the cord is)

    Really its all about knowing the risks and ensuring your childs safety without going overboard - perhaps instead of speaking behind this first time mums back with her mother in law, you should just gently be helping her and encouraging her not to be so worried all the time ;)
    Baldrick, does it have to be this way? Our valued friendship ending with me cutting you up into strips and telling the prince that you walked over a very sharp cattle grid in an extremely heavy hat?
  • Spendless
    Spendless Posts: 24,649 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Not having a soft toy in their cots doesn't mean they will never experience cuddling up to a teddy at night. As I've already said I never put any toys inside my kids cots. When DD was 3 or 4 she was bought a large winnie the pooh bear. She's now 10 and still sleeps with it every night, it even went on a school residential with her 2 weeks ago, hidden inside a cushion cover though cos she didn't want the other girls she dormed with to know she still slept with it.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.