Would You be Upset if Your Partner Watched !!!!!!?

Edwardia

I have no problem with my husband looking at !!!!!! online. I do have a problem with him paying for it behind my back. I have an even bigger problem with him getting hyped up over viruses in his laptop and yelling at me. Not my problem. I don't look at !!!!!! online because I'm too worried about viruses. I do read slash fanfiction though

Gloomendoom

Edwardia wrote: »

I do read slash fanfiction though

I had to Google that.

1. slash fanfiction

fanfiction depicting a sexual and/or romantic relationship or situation between two characters of the same gender.

may involve real people or imaginary (sometimes copyrighted) characters.

Then I had to Google fanfiction.

lostinrates

Treevo wrote: »

Of course I wouldn't be upset! Why would anyone?

People have the right to set their own parameters in their current relationships. What DH and I do in our relationship has changed parameters slightly for both of us to be right for us both to feel comfortable.

Some people do have a different , it doesn't mean others have to share it but I think people can differ.

I think the Lovelace film coming out brings the whole moral thing back to the fore....that a generation of women amoung libertarians for the first time openly admitting an interest and a story of empowerment turns out to be a story of some ...brutality....and empowerment again. Its a confusing issue and not always as straightforward as we'd like to believe, whether who
Ly opposed or wholly in favour or somewhere in the middle.

geoffky

I put a !!!!!! dvd on last night..
I was sat there but all i could see was a black screen and some bald fat fella sitting with his willy in his hand...I then realised i had in fact not turned the tv on.

tinkerbell28

Depends.

Do I believe men who watch !!!!!! fancy them all and wish they were there? No.

I believe men who use it and women, do so for a quick fix and have no issues with wanting to run off into the sunset with these people, making babies and buying houses.

That doesn't apply to addicts however who do get distorted by extreme !!!!!!.

Would I be happy if he spent money which could've gone towards a family holiday? No.

Would I be happy if he were watching, drugged, trafficked and abused women? No. How would you tell is another debate entirely.

Depends if the question is jealousy, financially or politically related, IMO.

Rev

Was having this talk with two friends a few days ago. They reads fifty shades type stuff and watch a bit of !!!!!!. Neither of their partners are bothered (My friends are women btw).

I'd not be bothered either. If she thinks he fancies them and not her what about his celebrity crushes? Or hers? My bet is she fancies the pants of some Hollywood hunk that looks zip like her husband. Isn't that the same thing?

You chose who to be in a relationship with. Just because you window shop doesn't mean you want to exchange the model you already have.

Treevo

lostinrates wrote: »

People have the right to set their own parameters in their current relationships. What DH and I do in our relationship has changed parameters slightly for both of us to be right for us both to feel comfortable.

Some people do have a different , it doesn't mean others have to share it but I think people can differ.

I think the Lovelace film coming out brings the whole moral thing back to the fore....that a generation of women amoung libertarians for the first time openly admitting an interest and a story of empowerment turns out to be a story of some ...brutality....and empowerment again. Its a confusing issue and not always as straightforward as we'd like to believe, whether who
Ly opposed or wholly in favour or somewhere in the middle.

I think that rather depends on who you believe. Do you think Linda Lovelace would have been as 'outraged' (for want of a better word) if she had shared in the financial successes over the years? I don't. I think she's angry that she did something that made her infamous and when the money ran out for her, but kept pouring in for the others involved, she became angry and decided to try and stop them from profiting.

loulou123

I don't have a problem with hubby watching !!!!!!, he has some dvds in our dvd tower and I know he watches them sometimes if I'm working late/night shift - I've found them still in dvd player! We occasionally watch them together too.

I love reading erotic fiction and he thinks its hilarious that I'll just sit on train reading some pornographic novel on my kindle.

A few years ago though my hubby started using the live cams on the internet and I wasn't so happy with that, as it seemed more personal.

But general !!!!!! is no problem to me at all.

Any

Treevo wrote: »

I think that rather depends on who you believe. Do you think Linda Lovelace would have been as 'outraged' (for want of a better word) if she had shared in the financial successes over the years? I don't. I think she's angry that she did something that made her infamous and when the money ran out for her, but kept pouring in for the others involved, she became angry and decided to try and stop them from profiting.

Yes, I find that story also a bit "fitting"...
I wasn't there, I cannot say 100% either way, but I am not sure I believe everything of her memoires.

aileth

Rev wrote: »

I'd not be bothered either. If she thinks he fancies them and not her what about his celebrity crushes? Or hers? My bet is she fancies the pants of some Hollywood hunk that looks zip like her husband. Isn't that the same thing?

This is a very good point actually!