We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
An "unprecedented and historic result"
Comments
-
This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0
-
Out,_Vile_Jelly wrote: »We live on an island next to an ocean, and wind is free. Makes sense to try and harness it, and other renewable sources.We certainly can't depend on it at present, but it would be silly not to investigate its possibilities just because wind turbines have become stupidly politicised.
The problem, for me, isn't the turbines as such but how they are deployed.
The grid isn't built to deal with them which is totally cart before the horse.
We have no "storage" capability and "wind" can't meet peak demand.
Sort that out and it starts to make more sense.
If you don't then the entire thing is giant waste of money.0 -
I suspect many people 'want' what they are told they can 'have'. We have become a marketeers dreamland.
You are right in what you say. It doesn't sound very sustainable long term though does it?
Just another historical moment that will be recorded in the annuals of time. In reality the tomorrow will simply become the new norm. As the past gets forgotten.0 -
The Greens have plenty of substance, even if I disagree with much of it; they've lost momentum because green issues aren't most people's priority in tough times.
The Greens appear to be extreme left wingers in disguise. From what I've heard their policies are uncosted. The senior party officials lack real substance.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »The Greens appear to be extreme left wingers in disguise. From what I've heard their policies are uncosted. The senior party officials lack real substance.
Watermelon, is the phrase often deployed.
The UK Green Party is where a lot of the old Eurocommunists from the CPGB went to hide.0 -
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »Unprecedented and historic?.....
Hardly....Lets look at the history of "protest vote" parties in the UK....
...
I'm reminded of the United Empire Party.0 -
Just watching the one show and the UKIP candidate for Dartford ( Jo Shipham) is so in touch with the UK that the Union Flag on her jumper is upside down.
Did she really just say that they aren't racist and even one of their candidates is 'coloured'!0 -
Lets hope they keep it up until 2015 because the bulk of their support comes from the tory right and guess what that'll mean......yes Ed will be in Downing Street simply because their votes will not be translated into seats because of first past the post so there will no need to worry about a UKIP/Tory alliance:rotfl:Graham_Devon wrote: »Well done UKIP. The title is how the BBC voting correspondent (I'm sure that's not his name, but he appears every voters go to the polls!) has described UKIP's results in the local elections.
UKIP are averaging 26% of the vote and have so far gained 42 seats with a lot of counting yet to undertake.
The deputy leader of the UKIP has been on the news and has accepted that some of these votes will be protest votes. He was very open about this, however, not all can be protest votes, especially as membership is also increasing.
This may....just may provide a turning point for politics itself. It may, just may, focus current politicians on sorting out the mess instead of continually kicking it into the long grass. It may, just may, focus their minds on the economic advantages, but also disadvantages of immigration.
So well done UKIP. Well deserved. Though I have to say, I didn't vote. Working weird and wonderful hours this week and couldn't go to my usual voting haunt so that was that!
I bet they are wishing for PR now!0 -
They are made up of unreconstructed bigot's who still use 'coloured' to describe a black person...shameful!:(Just watching the one show and the UKIP candidate for Dartford ( Jo Shipham) is so in touch with the UK that the Union Flag on her jumper is upside down.
Did she really just say that they aren't racist and even one of their candidates is 'coloured'!0 -
Did she really just say that they aren't racist and even one of their candidates is 'coloured'!
Refreshing to hear people speak normally. Rather than clouded in rehearsed spin. Foul language is now a trait of British life. So a few misplaced expressions don't deserve pulling apart.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
