We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Baroness Thatcher passed away

1181921232455

Comments

  • bigheadxx
    bigheadxx Posts: 3,047 Forumite
    Tancred wrote: »
    She was voted in mainly because Labour was so incompetent and extreme at the time, and the SDP-Liberal alliance was a bit of a joke - the 'two Davids' were a bit like the two Ronnies.

    She did represent a disturbing new change in British society - the development of greed, selfishness and ruthless individualism. The old feeling of social solidarity, present ever since 1945, simply dissipated into nothingness. The age of 'us and them' had begun.

    It's a shame that Heath lost in 1974 because he was a far more clear sighted politician than Thatcher.

    Greed and selfishness had been entrenched by the trade unions by 1979, it was social solidarity it was "closed shop" mentality, you couldn't get on if you weren't in the union. Them and us, which the unions wired its members into, destroyed the competitiveness of UK industry long before Mrs T came along.

    The often misquoted " no such thing as society" line is exactly right. You ARE an individual with a family and it is YOUR responsibility to look after them. The state is a safety net and you are obliged to contribute to it in order that you may be entitled to its support one day.

    "I think we've been through a period where too many people have been given to understand that if they have a problem, it's the government's job to cope with it. 'I have a problem, I'll get a grant.' 'I'm homeless, the government must house me.' They're casting their problem on society. And, you know, there is no such thing as society. There are individual men and women, and there are families. And no government can do anything except through people, and people must look to themselves first. It's our duty to look after ourselves and then, also to look after our neighbour. People have got the entitlements too much in mind, without the obligations. There's no such thing as entitlement, unless someone has first met an obligation."
  • piglet74
    piglet74 Posts: 2,157 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    David Cameron has just sent his offical letter to the Thatcher residence. It starts

    "I regret to inform you that due to recent events you now have too many bedrooms..."
  • vivatifosi
    vivatifosi Posts: 18,746 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Mortgage-free Glee! PPI Party Pooper
    In some ways, I'm glad she has died. Alzheimers is a horrible, evil disease that robs people of their dignity. Nobody deserves that and nor does their family.
    Please stay safe in the sun and learn the A-E of melanoma: A = asymmetry, B = irregular borders, C= different colours, D= diameter, larger than 6mm, E = evolving, is your mole changing? Most moles are not cancerous, any doubts, please check next time you visit your GP.
  • piglet74
    piglet74 Posts: 2,157 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    It may well be... But so is starving to death!!!
  • Fella
    Fella Posts: 7,921 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    piglet74 wrote: »
    It may well be... But so is starving to death!!!

    Going by your signature, that's not something you're in any imminent danger of.
  • Tancred
    Tancred Posts: 1,424 Forumite
    bigheadxx wrote: »
    Greed and selfishness had been entrenched by the trade unions by 1979, it was social solidarity it was "closed shop" mentality, you couldn't get on if you weren't in the union. Them and us, which the unions wired its members into, destroyed the competitiveness of UK industry long before Mrs T came along.

    The often misquoted " no such thing as society" line is exactly right. You ARE an individual with a family and it is YOUR responsibility to look after them. The state is a safety net and you are obliged to contribute to it in order that you may be entitled to its support one day.

    "I think we've been through a period where too many people have been given to understand that if they have a problem, it's the government's job to cope with it. 'I have a problem, I'll get a grant.' 'I'm homeless, the government must house me.' They're casting their problem on society. And, you know, there is no such thing as society. There are individual men and women, and there are families. And no government can do anything except through people, and people must look to themselves first. It's our duty to look after ourselves and then, also to look after our neighbour. People have got the entitlements too much in mind, without the obligations. There's no such thing as entitlement, unless someone has first met an obligation."

    The unions did go too far, but then again a lot of people back then were getting derisory wages while the big bosses grew fat on massive bonuses etc. Are you saying that it's OK to be greedy if you are lucky enough to be a company boss but not if you are a worker? As for lack of competitiveness, this was largely due to sterling being too strong a currency.

    I agree with some of what you say about the need to take responsibility, but Thatcher and her successors created a climate of fear and guilt. An unemployed person is now made to feel like a criminal, even if he is jobless through no fault of his own. This is what I can't accept. And I also can't accept that there is no such thing as society - society is people, and people exist. We interact with each other - family, friends, colleagues, etc. This is society.
  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,795 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    When Tony Benn dies I will be very sad.

    But it won't bother me at all what the right wingers will say in celebration, I'll ignore them.

    Not really sure why all the Maggie acolytes are getting so worked up. If you don't like what someone says, just ignore them.

    I don't agree with much that Tony Benn stands for, but I respect him and I think that is the difference between me and some of others on this thread. I might say something nice or neutral about him when he dies, but why on earth would I lower myself into the gutter to slag him off or say that I am happy that he died just because I disagree with his political views?
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
  • worried_jim
    worried_jim Posts: 11,631 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Since arriving in hell, Margaret Thatcher has already closed down two furnaces and privatised fire.
  • macaque_2
    macaque_2 Posts: 2,439 Forumite
    Perhaps not everything she did turned out to be right but she was a true leader; something we have missed ever since.

    Blessings and peace be upon her.
  • olly300
    olly300 Posts: 14,738 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    ukcarper wrote: »
    Not to keen on Maggie myself but I suspect that she would not be to concerned that a load of left wingers were celebrating her death if fact i wouldn't be surprised if it amused her.

    Do you know what's good about her?

    People actually have strong feelings about her and her policies.

    How many politicians of today if they died 20+ years later are people going to have such strong feelings about?

    Tony Blair? - Some people will have some feelings of annoyance.

    Gordon Brown? David Cameron? - Definitely no.
    I'm not cynical I'm realistic :p

    (If a link I give opens pop ups I won't know I don't use windows)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.