marriage & benefits helppppp

Errata

Executive Summary: OP wants to marry her boyfriend of not very long standing but only if the government will continue to financially support her and her children so he doesn't have to.

Pollycat

MiddyMum wrote: »

I dont know where to start with this thread....

Why not?

What would you like to post?

Mupette

midnight_express wrote: »

That would be apart from the council house, income support, housing benefit, council tax benefit, DLA, child benefit and child tax credits.

Thanks for your posts they are a great example of why breeders benefits should be abolished.

I think that is a bit nasty, OP has already said the father of her second child was killed in action, obviously if he had not, she would possibly be still with him settled with 2.4 children just as the daily fail readers like it.

Unfortunately he was killed in action. she has moved on, what do you expect her to do with her children, one father was a waste of space and the other well i've said twice already.

These young uns may not type to everyone's taste on here, that is a different and irrelevant here.

so wind your neck in, you assume she is a breeder by only mentioning what you want, and not the full story.

mynameistallulah

Mummybobo wrote: »

kids call him dad yes, he stays at his mothers on leave never used my address and been to skeggy for weekend with kids for sons bday thats as far as things have progressed lol, yes my ex was a total waste but i got the best outa the relationship... my son

So you've only spent the night with your "partner" twice and you are planning to marry him, and he is going to continue staying at his mothers when on leave? Pull the other one! :rotfl:

mynameistallulah

Mupette wrote: »

what do you expect her to do with her children

Raise them to have decent moral standards?

Pollycat

midnight_express wrote: »

Thanks for your posts they are a great example of why breeders benefits should be abolished.

Mupette wrote: »

I think that is a bit nasty, OP has already said the father of her second child was killed in action, obviously if he had not, she would possibly be still with him settled with 2.4 children just as the daily fail readers like it.

I think it is a nasty term to use too.

I've seen midnight express use it before:

midnight_express wrote: »

Yet another example of why breeders benefits should be abolished.

Mupette

mynameistallulah wrote: »

Raise them to have decent moral standards?

Again another who chooses to hide behind snide remarks, I'm not saying you can't read but......

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/365935

you want to get b1tchy take it to discussion time

heartbreak_star

I think the term was a little harsh too, but I see where they're coming from.

I am generally a leftie, would be happy if the Daily Fail offices self-destructed, I cried the day the Tories got into power...but seeing people deliberately try and cheat the system of benefits that are put there for those in need boils my blood!

OP, I suggest that you sort out the child minding ASAP, decide whether you love your partner enough to marry him or love your benefits more, and budget around your remaining money and his salary.

Also, text speak is simply illiteracy IMO.

HBS x

midnight_express

Mupette wrote: »

I think that is a bit nasty, OP has already said the father of her second child was killed in action, obviously if he had not, she would possibly be still with him settled with 2.4 children just as the daily fail readers like it.

Unfortunately he was killed in action. she has moved on, what do you expect her to do with her children, one father was a waste of space and the other well i've said twice already.

These young uns may not type to everyone's taste on here, that is a different and irrelevant here.

so wind your neck in, you assume she is a breeder by only mentioning what you want, and not the full story.

I know she is a breeder because she has two kids. I know she is on benefits because she told us so. Let's face it without the kids she wouldn't have a council house and she'd be living on £55 a week JSA rather than the several hundred a week she is currently raking in. In a grossly over populated country it makes no sense having a benefit system that rewards the bone idle and unemployable when they have children.

midnight_express

Just curious Mildred, why can't you have a private birth in Wales ? Aren't there any private hospitals ?