Boyfriend/husband and lap dancing clubs..???

Oliver14

PrincessPlaty wrote: »

Its classed as glamour shell although i agree the photographer was pants but you don't turn down paid work no matter how rubbish they are

You do if you have some personal respect

PrincessPlaty

shellsuit wrote: »

Don't you think about it showing you in a bad light though? (no pun intended lol!)

If someone offered me money to take crap pics of me, I'd run, because I'd never know where they would pop up to haunt me in the future :rotfl:

Seriously, I would rather pay someone myself and have cracking photos taken.

Nope that's not a problem because I don't use my real name so it's not like they are likely to come up in a search :rotfl:

When I want decent images I work on what is classed as TF (time for images) and I get stuff like this

PrincessPlaty

Oliver14 wrote: »

You do if you have some personal respect

Why? They are not going to come back to haunt me in any way at all. If i google my name now nothing comes up at all.
I have a lot of respect for myself a lot more than most in the industry do.

Tropez

PrincessPlaty wrote: »

Image removed as point has been made

Aww, poopies.

*Plays dumb*

What point?

VestanPance

Gloomendoom wrote: »

What does this mean? It sounds gross!

A colloquialism, maybe?

It's a polite way of saying she liked to leave things all over the place. Like not being able to put worn clothes in the washing basket, but rather three feet away on the floor. And a trail of shoes from one end of the house through every room top the other side of the house.

Then she'd get annoyed because she couldn't find things. :rotfl:

shellsuit

PrincessPlaty wrote: »

Nope that's not a problem because I don't use my real name so it's not like they are likely to come up in a search :rotfl:

When I want decent images I work on what is classed as TF (time for images) and I get stuff like this

You're gonna think I'm a right nasty b!tch, but I don't mean to come across as that, honestly, but you are a very pretty girl and all I can see on this pic is a face full of make up (I don't mean the eyes etc they look fab, I mean your foundation or whatever it is), which you really don't need, so I wouldn't call it a good pic at all, because all I'm focused on is that

(I'm just being honest, I don't mean to cause offence at all!)

PrincessPlaty

Tropez wrote: »

Aww, poopies.

*Plays dumb*

What point?

I'm not putting it back

Tropez

PrincessPlaty wrote: »

I'm not putting it back

Can't blame a guy for trying, eh?

PrincessPlaty

shellsuit wrote: »

You're gonna think I'm a right nasty b!tch, but I don't mean to come across as that, honestly, but you are a very pretty girl and all I can see on this pic is a face full of make up (I don't mean the eyes etc they look fab, I mean your foundation or whatever it is), which you really don't need, so I wouldn't call it a good pic at all, because all I'm focused on is that

(I'm just being honest, I don't mean to cause offence at all!)

No offence taken, its because of the light reflecting which is why it comes out on the images like that
For something that you would want to keep as a memory I agree it is no good at all, however in the industry this is classed as an exceptionally good image, due to it being technically correct at every aspect. It shows that I can do my job and that the photographer can do his if that makes sense :rotfl:

PrincessPlaty

Tropez wrote: »

Can't blame a guy for trying, eh?

You saw it anyway and besides it was a crap example :rotfl: