We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Utility Warehouse (Telecom Plus) Discussion
Options
Comments
-
You seem to have made an enemy, not that I think he or his friends will take notice. They never do. They live in a world of their own make believe and expect everyone who visits here to believe it.
I want evidence Keggs, surely you can appreciate that? I've been accused of making vague allegations. We have been informed on apparently;). Yet no one can quote me a Which libel that has been made in this thread.
Honestly mate this is turning into a UW nightmare.0 -
I want evidence Keggs, surely you can appreciate that? I've been accused of making vague allegations.
Here's another :- Raging Warps StatsThe mind of the bigot is like the pupil of the eye; the more light you pour upon it, the more it will contract.
Oliver Wendell Holmes0 -
Wasn't it you who wrote "I as well as others, have pointed out that the methodology used by Which is open to abuse. " on the last page?
Here's another :- Raging Warps Stats
Yes, which it is. I've never said the Which survey has been abused, what I contend is that any survey which relies on its readers to vote is open to abuse, fact.0 -
Considering this thread could be under surveillance for possible libel, here's another anagram -
Warrants Tags Pigs'The only thing that helps me keep my slender grip on reality is the friendship I have with my collection of singing potatoes'
Sleepy J.0 -
Considering this thread could be under surveillance for possible libel
Care to quote a libel against Which magazine Maz? Your mates have sadly failed to find any. They have resorted to anagrams to divert attention away from this glaring anomaly called evidence.
This has turned into a truly dreadful day for UW, spurious claims backed up with fresh air.0 -
uptomyeyeballs wrote: »A Cavalcade Modelling Nil Energy
Can you give me an anagram of 'show me the libel'? :rotfl:0 -
Considering this thread could be under surveillance for possible libel, here's another anagram -
Warrants Tags Pigs
Please re read my post, noting the emboldened words.
I was just entering into the fun!'The only thing that helps me keep my slender grip on reality is the friendship I have with my collection of singing potatoes'
Sleepy J.0 -
A Deed Singleton Quintet (we'd probably all get some peace if this happened!)Call me Carmine....
HAVE YOU SEEN QUENTIN'S CASHBACK CARD??0 -
Wasn't it you who wrote "I as well as others, have pointed out that the methodology used by Which is open to abuse. " on the last page?
Here's another :- Raging Warps Stats
Dear Jimexbox
Don't bring me into your dispute. As has been said it was you and others not UW IDs who brought up the question of Which Magazine's methodology.
If you have to pay the price of that then don't expect any sympathy from me. The AUWF have brought it on themselves.
By the way, if Q is still here, can I have the username you use to gain access to the NWP site.
In any event Jimexbox look on the bright side. If Which are monitoring this site then it might just begin to make you and your AUWF friends think a bit before making ridiculous statements you can't back up.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards