We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Utility Warehouse (Telecom Plus) Discussion
Options
Comments
-
Indeed, they have an option to purchase which could be exercised later this year.
From Wikipedia (don't laugh)
In February 2006, the Company entered into an agreement with npower under which they took responsibility for purchasing the energy used by Telecom Plus customers although Telecom Plus remain responsible for all customer-management activities, such as billing, customer service, metering, debt collection and administration. As part of the arrangements, npower have an option to acquire the 29.9% of the equity held by the Board Members of Telecom Plus during 2009.That gum you like is coming back in style.0 -
nPower would be a fool if they did. In any event they aren't showing signs of doing so.0
-
If uw is cheaper than their previous suppliers, just think how much more they could be saving by going to their cheapest supplier.
I am an Independent Distributor with Utility Warehouse and any opinions expressed here are my own and may not be shared by the company.The mind of the bigot is like the pupil of the eye; the more light you pour upon it, the more it will contract.
Oliver Wendell Holmes0 -
Extract from recent article in FT.
"Telecom Plus is a multi-utility reseller. It buys services from producers at wholesale rates and sells them on to private customers. The company has grown rapidly in recent years.
The company recently announced that it expects profits to lag this year as it adds infrastructure to prepare for future growth. As a result, its shares are drifting sideways. I suspect the price is supported by a proposed 22p dividend. I also notice that prices bounce each time they drop into the 270p area. The shares recently slipped into this area and are ripe for a bounce.
There are two other factors that could boost them in the near future.
Oxford Power Holdings is 20 per cent owned by Telecom Plus. International Power has an option, which is due to expire shortly, to purchase Oxford. There are no guarantees that a takeover will occur. But if it did happen, it would mean a £15m payment to Telecom Plus which is not bad for a company with pre-tax earnings of £22m.
The deal makes sense for International Power because it has a huge generating capacity but no distribution to end-use customers. Oxford Power offers this benefit. However, some analysts think International Power has balance sheet problems and might be unable to raise the £70m-80m required to complete the deal.
Another deal worth thinking about is Npower’s option to acquire Telecom Plus. The option will
expire on November 20. Once again, there are no guarantees that Npower will exercise its option. But if it did, shareholders would benefit enormously.
It is anyone’s guess if either deal will be completed. Even so, the mere possibility of a deal will probably support Telecom Plus shares in the next six months. For this reason, I think there is no significant downside risk to holding shares in this company."
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/ef137f0a-51e2-11de-b986-00144feabdc0.html0 -
-
Oh this is fun:
The more the UW apparatchiks and stakhanovites end up spending time here posting the less damage they do "selling" their unlikely-to-eventually-prove-a-good-deal vapour-ware-wizzo-deal, thus the less damage they will cause to our fellow men.
I wouldnae touch UW with a very long barge-pole: and would advise anyone else to avoid them as well.
There are several long posts relating to UW in this sub-board with differing views (some in favour, many against UW). IMHO the most vociferous and increasingly panicking posters are, oddly, "distributors" for UW. These distributors/senior managers or whatever they call themselves operate in a manner many fair-minded people would find reminiscent of a Pyramid scheme. However UW tell me it is not a Pyramid scheme so I accept their statement that it is not a Pyramid scheme.
Cheers!
Lodger
PS As I said, clearly not a Pyramid Scheme.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards