Mansion 23" led tv

KJEG

TakeThis wrote: »

Yes, we know that the warranty is not worth a jot and the people behind the company are apt to do a 'flit'. That is a fait accompli(established fact).

Just so as everybody, especially the "newbies" like yourself know where you stand.

Mmmm...


9.2.12 intentionally make false or misleading statements about investments, their price or their prospects. If you do, you may be committing a criminal offence.


I'll leave that to others to interpret as they wish but I think it's pretty clear!

Benlw1994

It's starting to feel like this is going completely off subject.

KJEG

If you have all this information and the funds why don't you take it to Trading Standards and get them to investigate them properly and if it can be established they may well involve the police, freeze their bank account, seize goods and even possibly arrest those concerned for fraud and put us all out of our misery!

That way, it'll minimize loses to all those people still waiting for goods or a refund rather than broadcasting information on an open forum and giving Mansion the "heads up". Then everyone here will be more than happy to sing your praises.

I'm sure you're a very rich and powerful man but I'm not in the least intimidated by your threats. If you're so determined to close Mansion do it quickly so as we all can stop wasting our time but I will not be a party to any form of vendetta.

TakeThis

I think the facts posted here speak for themselves. I certainly would not recommend doing business with any of those characters.

No manufacturer with which to deal and little chance of a reliable service under warranty. Did you ask about a Technical Department in the case of a fault developing?

You might as well buy a no name TV from a roving market stall.

neilwoods

I am glad KJEG posted the t&c of this forum. especially this one.

9.2.1 post or transmit material that infringes the intellectual property rights or other rights of others or post or transmit any material that is unlawful, obscene, defamatory, threatening, harassing, abusive, hateful, or embarrassing to any other person as determined by us in our sole discretion;

However KJEG seems to completely ignore all that, he is the most abusive person currently posting in this thread.

So KJEG if you were not prepared to use the log in details provided, then how did you get the pics posted by jockey, they appear to exactly the same and if so, did you seek his permission to copy them.

Yes Benlw1994 it has gone way off topic, you can thank KJEG for that, he wants to post about everything other than the facts about mansion Tv. Before anyone pipes up, yes i have posted off topic, but to only reply.

KJEG

neilwoods wrote: »

I am glad KJEG posted the t&c of this forum. especially this one.

9.2.1 post or transmit material that infringes the intellectual property rights or other rights of others or post or transmit any material that is unlawful, obscene, defamatory, threatening, harassing, abusive, hateful, or embarrassing to any other person as determined by us in our sole discretion;

However KJEG seems to completely ignore all that, he is the most abusive person currently posting in this thread.

So KJEG if you were not prepared to use the log in details provided, then how did you get the pics posted by jockey, they appear to exactly the same and if so, did you seek his permission to copy them.

Yes Benlw1994 it has gone way off topic, you can thank KJEG for that, he wants to post about everything other than the facts about mansion Tv. Before anyone pipes up, yes i have posted off topic, but to only reply.

Mmmm...

I'm pretty sure jockeybull will have a response to that and he, as well as I do, know for certain the integrity of information and comments posted here.

neilwoods

I did not ask jockeybull, I asked yourself KJEG, not that i expected a reply, as your good for NOT replying to direct questions.

KJEG

As for the "clever individual" that has uploaded Bart Simpson, or whoever the hell it is, again I think that shows the mentality of some people and how seriously they take this.

KJEG

neilwoods wrote: »

I did not ask jockeybull, I asked yourself KJEG, not that i expected a reply, as your good for NOT replying to direct questions.

I think I'll wait for jockeybull's reply...thanks all the same.

I'm really not obligated to answer your intimidating and absurd questions.

KJEG

Mmmm...

Looks like another "clown" has posted my photos on his! Very clever!