We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

The Work Programme New Thread

1165166168170171462

Comments

  • donnajunkie
    donnajunkie Posts: 32,412 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    LadyMissA wrote: »
    these providers do alot more than just the WP you know.
    the company as a whole might do other things but the office here only does the work programme.
  • LadyMissA
    LadyMissA Posts: 3,263 Forumite
    the company as a whole might do other things but the office here only does the work programme.
    Yes we know that but normally the providers do a lot more in their business than just the WP. Look up your one online and see what they do.
  • LadyMissA
    LadyMissA Posts: 3,263 Forumite
    they will claim the travel costs back from dwp. so thats part of why its so odd that they are so particular when it comes to proof of travel, its not their money afterall. some think they need something for their records but mine refunds plenty of things that dont come with a receipt or any sort of proof. for example passport photos for a cscs card. they are still awkward though and make you show them the photos before refunding the cost. to me this proves what i was saying all along and that they dont trust us.
    yours is advertising for new staff? i have heard mine is making staff redundant due to their lack of success overall.
    They do not claim the travel back from the DWP. The payments they get for us on the WP are meant to cover all their costs.

    They ask for a receipt (here we go again) for accounting reasons.
  • donnajunkie
    donnajunkie Posts: 32,412 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    LadyMissA wrote: »
    reply from my WP provider as to what happens to me in a years time if I still have no job is:

    'As far as I know you go back to the jobcentre'
    it will be 1 of 2 things. we will either be sent onto the community work scheme that the government was talking about starting a while ago or we will be back with the jobcentre for 13 weeks and then refered back to the work programme for another 2 years.
  • hi all, first post. i was sent on this programme yesterday and today standguide called and said they are sending me on a course tomorrow morning. any idea what i can expect from this course as the woman on the phone didn't know, which doesn't exactly fill me with confidence, so so any information would be appreciated.
  • LadyMissA
    LadyMissA Posts: 3,263 Forumite
    it will be 1 of 2 things. we will either be sent onto the community work scheme that the government was talking about starting a while ago or we will be back with the jobcentre for 13 weeks and then refered back to the work programme for another 2 years.
    I wont be doing either as it's a mega fail and I will make sure the gov know this if I am still here in 12 mths time. Will prefer to be dead if I am.
  • donnajunkie
    donnajunkie Posts: 32,412 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    simson3325 wrote: »
    what gets me is why cant we sign on at the work programe,instead of going another day to the jobcentre just to sign a bit of paper,
    it would save jobcentre the hassle as well.
    when i signed on a few weeks ago i pointed out what a waste of money it was for them to ask for evidence and then for me to go along to the provider the following day to be asked for evidence again. whats the point in paying 2 people to do the same job?
  • LadyMissA
    LadyMissA Posts: 3,263 Forumite
    when i signed on a few weeks ago i pointed out what a waste of money it was for them to ask for evidence and then for me to go along to the provider the following day to be asked for evidence again. whats the point in paying 2 people to do the same job?
    I do not get asked at the WP for any evidence only the email I send once a week that they copy onto my electronic file. They are really not interested. All I get is 'there is something round the corner'
  • donnajunkie
    donnajunkie Posts: 32,412 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    scooby088 wrote: »
    In all honesty the jobcentre never or rarely ask for any proof, i think when your on the WP they lose all interest and want to move you out quickly.

    I agree but WP providers aren't set up to do signing.
    my jc doesnt seem to follow any set pattern. some people get asked all the time and some only get asked every now and then.
    as the providers are policing our jobsearch they could save money at the jobcentre by excusing us from signing while we are on the work programme. idiots will say but you need a legal declaration with your signature. in response to that i would say how come people didnt have to sign on while on new deal?
  • donnajunkie
    donnajunkie Posts: 32,412 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    LadyMissA wrote: »
    Hardship payments do not pay NI as far as I know
    yes probably but you said if people get sanctioned they get nothing at all. i was just correcting that.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.