We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Do the council still give those voucher things for decorating when you move in?
Comments
-
Wee_Willy_Harris wrote: »No. I think that ANY tenant should expect a home they are renting to be of a reasonable decorative standard as a minimum. HA/LA decoration vouchers are only given if/when they can be justified.
have you ever been into a student house?0 -
Wee_Willy_Harris wrote: »However, if you rent social housing. It seems to be viewed by some that you should crawl backwards in gratitude over hot coals just because the roof is still on.
It's housing snobbery at its very worst, voiced from a position of sheer ignorance.
have you ever heard of the expression "beggars can't be choosers"? like it or not if you rely on the state for a house you can't really expect the same standards as a private house.
i've worked most of my life, but i was made redundant last month, so i can see your viewpoint. i bet you've hardly worked in your life?0 -
-
have you ever heard of the expression "beggars can't be choosers"? like it or not if you rely on the state for a house you can't really expect the same standards as a private house.
i've worked most of my life, but i was made redundant last month, so i can see your viewpoint. i bet you've hardly worked in your life?
Why shouldn't you expect the same standards? Of course, you are missing the point slightly because if the standards were the same in all cases, there would be no need for decorating vouchers. You can't have your cake AND eat it.
My personal circumstances are of no relevance to this discussion. Please try and focus on the bigger picture.0 -
Wee_Willy_Harris wrote: »Why shouldn't you expect the same standards? Of course, you are missing the point slightly because if the standards were the same in all cases, there would be no need for decorating vouchers. You can't have your cake AND eat it.
My personal circumstances are of no relevance to this discussion. Please try and focus on the bigger picture.
it's not really natural justice to have chavs in council houses that are better decorated than houses paid for by people that work/ contribute to society. it's also not an incentive for people to better themselves if they get "free" stuff from the taxpayer.
only someone that's never worked would take your opinion.0 -
it's not really natural justice to have chavs in council houses that are better decorated than houses paid for by people that work/ contribute to society. it's also not an incentive for people to better themselves if they get "free" stuff from the taxpayer.
only someone that's never worked would take your opinion.
Then perhaps standards in the private rented sector should be improved to meet a basic minimum standard of decoration? Of course, then you would have to employ decorators rather than just giving the tenant the means to buy paint. And I know which is more cost effective. But if, in these difficult times, you feel that spending more public money is the answer, then perhaps I should just bow to your greater wisdom. (Where,s the sarcasm button when you need it?).0 -
Wee_Willy_Harris wrote: »Then perhaps standards in the private rented sector should be improved to meet a basic minimum standard of decoration? Of course, then you would have to employ decorators rather than just giving the tenant the means to buy paint. And I know which is more cost effective. But if, in these difficult times, you feel that spending more public money is the answer, then perhaps I should just bow to your greater wisdom. (Where,s the sarcasm button when you need it?).
it's still not natural justice to have chavs in decent houses. i think if you can work but choose not to you should be thrown out your house.
no, you misunderstand my viewpoint. i wouldn't give council house tenants vouchers or a free painting service. as i said before "beggars can't be choosers".0 -
it's still not natural justice to have chavs in decent houses. i think if you can work but choose not to you should be thrown out your house.
no, you misunderstand my viewpoint. i wouldn't give council house tenants vouchers or a free painting service. as i said before "beggars can't be choosers".
We live in a wealthy, developed country. Shouldn't EVERYONE live in decent housing? Legislation would seen to support that viewpoint.
Fortunately, your ill considered thoughts don't fall into the catagory that we call "Living in a civilised society". As such, they aren't really relevant.
Of course, there's nothing stopping you from applying for social housing.0 -
We moved into a HA house last year where there was a decorating grant available.
The grant was in a form of vouchers for specific shops, or you could choose to have the same amount applied to your rent account.
We opted for the amount to be applied to the rent account, which meant that we were then free to shop around for the best deals on the paint and paper etc.
The decor was minging and filthy when we took the house on, but with some hard graft and some very kind relatives, we got the whole place stripped, papered and painted in 5 days, ready for moving into.
You don't get the vouchers for all properties here. Just the one's which need decorating badly. Suppose it's cheaper to give a tenant £300 in vouchers to decorate a house (or have it paid to the rent account), than pay for contractors to come in and do the same.Tank fly boss walk jam nitty gritty...0 -
it's still not natural justice to have chavs in decent houses. i think if you can work but choose not to you should be thrown out your house.
no, you misunderstand my viewpoint. i wouldn't give council house tenants vouchers or a free painting service. as i said before "beggars can't be choosers".
You seem to have the wrong impression....
I work full-time and am not a chav relying on the state. I am just applying for a council property because I need to move down beeston (an hour away from my home now).
The council used to give vouchers whether you worked or not, it was irrelevant.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.9K Spending & Discounts
- 244.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards