Can an affair ever have a happy ending?

Lotus-eater

Welshwoofs wrote: »

I'd submit that you're simply choosing to read things into a posting that categorically weren't there because that suits your argument

Bull, I don't even have an argument, I just like twisting peoples tails when they get a bit above themselves.
If people post a certain way, I take it that way, if they then backtrack and make excuses, not my problem.

euronorris

Lotus-eater wrote: »

Obviously you need a man to do these things for you. I need a woman to clean the bathrooms, cos that's about the one thing I can't do.

Not necessarily a man. Just another person who possesses the required skills.

Luckily for me, OH is an engineer and very good at fixing the electrical appliances. Luckily for him, I am meticullous when washing the dishes, as he is just awful at that! It's like he doesn't even look at the item when he's washing it, just gives it a once over with a sponge or brush, and that puts it on the drying rack, often with dirt still on it! :mad:

I insist on washing the dishes now. He does the hoovering though. I hate hoovering.

euronorris

Belnahua - with respect, I think it would be better to address such personal issues between you via PM. Not on a random thread.

Taadaa

Lotus-eater wrote: »

Bull, I don't even have an argument, I just like twisting peoples tails when they get a bit above themselves.
If people post a certain way, I take it that way, if they then backtrack and make excuses, not my problem.

Oh.....I didn't realise that you presided over all pronouncements on this forum and had the ability to decide if someone was getting 'above themselves'. :eek:

I interpret that statement as the only person 'getting above themselves' is......you.

For the record, I have clarified, I don't have a problem, and I don't really care if you think that I do have a problem

FatVonD

Taadaa wrote: »

'Mistresses' :rotfl:sorry that phrase amuses me

What a derogatory term to use against an woman.

For the record, I am not anyone's mistress. He is mine

But it's the correct terminology, if the cap fits, etc. etc...

neverdespairgirl

euronorris wrote: »

A friend's Dad recently died, after saving his wife when their boat capsized on holiday. He managed to get her out, but then got stuck himself. :(:(:(

Very sad, but shows that (at least some) men will protect their women, their families, even if it means they may die themselves.

If it came to capsizing, I'd be more useful - I've done a lot of sailing, OH has done very little (-:

there are some things I leave to OH. I'm 5 ft 7, he's 6 ft 1. He's super-fit and athletic, I'm average. And he's a man, which means he does have greater strength for his height and weight.

So there are heavy things I could do, but as it's easier for him, it makes sense for me to leave them to him.

Welshwoofs

Lotus-eater wrote: »

Bull, I don't even have an argument, I just like twisting peoples tails when they get a bit above themselves.
If people post a certain way, I take it that way, if they then backtrack and make excuses, not my problem.

That's fine...but the problem with 'twisting people's tails' if you believe they've got 'a bit above themselves' is that they, or someone else, may well turn round and stamp on your testicles in response

By the way, what do you define as 'getting a bit above themselves'? What criteria are you using to judge this 'base level' they've supposedly risen above?

Taadaa

Welshwoofs wrote: »

That's fine...but the problem with 'twisting people's tails' if you believe they've got 'a bit above themselves' is that they, or someone else, may well turn round and stamp on your testicles in response

By the way, what do you define as 'getting a bit above themselves'? What criteria are you using to judge this 'base level' they've supposedly risen above?[/QUOTE]

Would love to know this as well. Is there a checklist? :rotfl:

Taadaa

FatVonD wrote: »

But it's the correct terminology, if the cap fits, etc. etc...

If the cap fits? Is it acceptable to say that a woman who has had more than 'considered respectable' sexual partners a !!!!!!?

FatVonD

Taadaa wrote: »

If the cap fits? Is it acceptable to say that a woman who has had more than 'considered respectable' sexual partners a !!!!!!?

I prefer the term promiscuous myself.