Ann summers, anyone else had problems with party organisers?

marywooyeah

goater78 wrote: »

They are a new poster so would have not been familiar with the board. They found a thread and may not have realised it was an old thread, they read some posts and offered advice on returning a product and you just posted a response having a go at them for doing this. Its not remotely welcoming and I am guessing you may have put that poster off from posting again. Still at least you manage to disrespect them so well done, I hope you feel proud of yourself.

On a side note it seems highly unlikely that the poster does work for Anne Summers, nothing in her post sounded like an official corporate response.

As already stated I did not intend to "abuse" anyone, nor would I do so deliberately - and find your suggestion that I would "be proud of myself" for doing so
The reason I stated to christine that the thread was over 4 years old is because I didnt understand why she was posting in it - it was meant to point out that there was no point posting in it due to its age.
The quote she used was a joke - she offered genuine advice to someone which was actually a joke - I pointed that out so she would understand it wasn't necessary to do so.
The reason I stated about working for Ann Summers was because it was her first post, and was offering advice on an Ann Summers product - its not unheard of for company reps to start new usernames and give rave reviews for companies or advice regarding products, such as christine did. I don't think it would put her off posting, but would probably alert her to not drag up threads that are years out of date.

donnap83

marywooyeah wrote: »

christine this thread is nearly 4 years old - not sure why you are dragging it up now with a comment which firstly bears no relation to the OP's issue and secondly the post you have quoted was quite clearly a joke. If you work for Ann Summers, you need to ask the permission of MSE to post on their behalf.

Bit harsh don't you think???

PZH

donnap83 wrote: »

Bit harsh don't you think???

Personally, I found nothing wrong with the post from marywooyeah or from wealdroam (See #59) - I think they have very valid points.