We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

The census is after me?

11719212223

Comments

  • kwaks
    kwaks Posts: 494 Forumite
    Flyboy152 wrote: »
    After several attenmpts, they could quite simply ask the respondent to post the document and provide proof of posting and/or delivery.


    Several attempts at what? The requirement is to fill it in ONCE, post it back ONCE. In doing so you have complied and it is deemed delivered. If they can't look after their mail it is not my problem.
  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    flexrider wrote: »
    *Taps fingers*

    *here we go again*

    Before you say odd notion again i had left the links to that site (wikipedia) to explain the differences in UK law and common and Statute(Status law which is the same)

    I suggest you read it before replying
    Thank you
    :p


    There is no such thing as "status law." The wikipedia page you link to, explains what "status" means in law, not something called "status law." :wall:
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    kwaks wrote: »
    Several attempts at what? The requirement is to fill it in ONCE, post it back ONCE. In doing so you have complied and it is deemed delivered. If they can't look after their mail it is not my problem.

    If it hasn't arrived at the ONS, the assumption will be that it hasn't been completed. If you refuse to complete it, you risk getting fined.
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
  • pmduk
    pmduk Posts: 10,683 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    You have spent so long squabbling on here, then deleting your posts, you could have completed the form a dozen times over.
  • pineapple
    pineapple Posts: 6,934 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 7 May 2011 at 10:34AM
    pmduk wrote: »
    You have spent so long squabbling on here, then deleting your posts, you could have completed the form a dozen times over.
    Indeed!
    Though to be fair I don't think the reasons for non completion were ever about time :)
  • flexrider
    flexrider Posts: 745 Forumite
    edited 7 May 2011 at 1:38PM
    Flyboy152 wrote: »
    There is no such thing as "status law." The wikipedia page you link to, explains what "status" means in law, not something called "status law." :wall:


    *Sighs*

    All this over a mis-spelling! How childish can one be ranting over someones grammar. Note to self please do not feed the trolls.:D
    Originally Posted by pmduk viewpost.gif
    You have spent so long squabbling on here, then deleting your posts, you could have completed the form a dozen times over.

    Originally Posted by pmduk viewpost.gif
    You have spent so long squabbling on here, then deleting your posts, you could have completed the form a dozen times over.

    Guilty but to be fair i was up at certain daft hours of the morning writing them previous posts but getting rants from everything regarding the way i was trying to make a point. Hence the stance on removing the posts
    Seem's everyone here became a English teacher overnight,Still i do not care it is my choice not to be on it glad to pay the 1,000 pound means 10 more years of knowing my details are secure since most Goverments lose data all the time. plus no private company gets there grubby little mitts on were i work (which i dont know being a millionare now owning my own businesses)
    "MSE Money saving challenges..8/12/13 3,500 saved so far :j" p.s if i been helpfully please leave me a thank you but seek official advice at all times from a pro
  • flexrider
    flexrider Posts: 745 Forumite
    Morglin wrote: »
    I daren't ask what you were doing with your other hand at the time.............:eek::rotfl::eek:

    Lin ;)

    Then Lin i shall not tell you but leave clues to suggest it was fun at the time.
    "MSE Money saving challenges..8/12/13 3,500 saved so far :j" p.s if i been helpfully please leave me a thank you but seek official advice at all times from a pro
  • kwaks
    kwaks Posts: 494 Forumite
    Flyboy152 wrote: »
    If it hasn't arrived at the ONS, the assumption will be that it hasn't been completed. If you refuse to complete it, you risk getting fined.



    Did you actually read the intepretaions act which I posted for you?

    Once again:

    Where an Act authorises or requires any document to be served by post (whether the expression "serve" or the expression" give " or " send " or any other expression is used) then, unless the contrary intention appears, the service is deemed to be effected by properly addressing, pre-paying and posting a letter containing the document and, unless the contrary is proved, to have been effected at the time at which the letter would be delivered in the ordinary course of post."


    They can make as many assumptions as they wish, however they need to PROVE that you did not complete it, had no intention of completing it and did not in fact post it. They have no basis to require you to do it again. This is exactly the same piece of legislation which the DVLA has been stung with regarding SORN.
  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    pineapple wrote: »
    Indeed!
    Though to be fair I don't think the reasons for non completion were ever about time :)

    What are the reasons then? Because, for life of me, I can't see any.
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
  • Googlewhacker
    Googlewhacker Posts: 3,887 Forumite
    why are you expending so much effort on this topic, its peoples choices whether they want to fill it in or not and take the risk of the fine surely?
    The Googlewhacker referance is to Dave Gorman and not to my opinion of the search engine!

    If I give you advice it is only a view and always always take professional advice before acting!!!

    4 people on the ignore list....Bliss!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.