We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Haven holidays/Bourne leisure serious unresolved complaint
Options
Comments
-
Sorry but the last 2 posters are wrong, and the first quite rude.
Here Endeth Today's Lessons!
Quoted JICSorry but the last 2 posters are wrong, and the first quite rude,
I note the first has read some of the post hence the knowledge of arrival time etc.
Okay breakdown time of post.
Quote= Op found mummy, though she had lost her money.
The machine did swallow the money and the original poster did witness this and has provided bourne with a highly likely scenario as to how this can happen eg the machine fault.
Quote= Someone in the family is disabled
The original poster is the disabled person who was removed from the premises the original poster also does not like being refered to as a child.
Quote=Op an entourage stood ther ground and were asked to leave. Op refused. They were escorted off the premises.
Again as said several times throughout neither of us were ever asked to leave the premises! If we had been and we refused they can of course remove us although if resistance is present the police MUST be called!
Again only the disabled guest eg the op was removed from the premises using force my mother was not removed and again I state the disability discrimination side, It was made very clear after my removal to the head security guard that I needed to be with my carer! and by forcing my removal and not allowing me re-entry this right was removed, understanderbly however if I had been asked to leave and had not done so they would of been right to remove me from whoever they choose, although still not in the way they removed me! eg only security can remove me and not an arcade assistant, and again I stress several other security guards were within view however none come to aid removal!
Quote= Op wants some compy
Op wants a replacement holiday to replace the one that bournes staff ruined.
Quote= I am afraid, Freddie does not condone gambling.
Not gambling as such just change for leisure time whilst on holiday eg arcade machines although small change machines and not major payouts so this is not a case of run out of money how do I get some more! I know I will make up a story, this is an incident which wether you believe or not happened.
Quote= Also, as my current wife does work in retail, I cannot condone an aggressive attitude to staff or other workers whatsoever, whether op thinks they are right or wrong, I would support Haven in their removal of you from the site.
Me neither however would you support haven in removing a holidaymaker from their site of which they have paid to be on if they know strongly they was not doing anything to which haven claim! again please read the post! Neither of us was agressive to haven holidays staff just merely asking for the money to be returned of which we are fully within rights to do! It is a change machine this is its sole purpose!
Again you state removal from site, It was not from site it was from the entertainment venue for that night only, I will also point out were I state removal was due to me physically assulting a member of havens staff! something which did not happen! Also had I resisted removal the police MUST be called, and they would of had me in an incident room so fast awaiting police arrival and at this point the holiday would of been terminated, wether haven/bourne like it or not not one of us assulted any of their staff!
They also claim several things my mum allegedly did however does that give haven the right to remove me from the premises? the answer is no they should of removed my mum if they claim she was in the wrong and not me!
Quote= In these circumstances, Freddie is unable to offer absolution, but if I was the site owner, I would look at the footage to see if their is any evidence of my staff being threatened and take the appropriate actions
Precisely! the head security guard claimed there was cctv footage of me physically assulting a member of their staff of which did just not happen! and I knew this so I was left thinking no you do not and if you do then were is this so called footage?!? Would it be this so called cctv footage of the camera system which I was told was not working?!? but oh wait that cannot happen they have cctv footage of me doing what they say!
Quote= One is not opposed to your views but I also have a life.
We should be worried of the Neavorsis Guardianista PC Fascists, whom envelop themselves in their own deemed self righteous behaviours and then impose them ad lib on the rest of society. As with the vegetarian who comes to dinner and insist their needs are above yours, if you cannot live with other people, it is not me who has the problem, but the one showing the behaviour
I am not asking for favouritism, I am merely asking for resolvement, granted had I assulted the staff they would be right to remove me however because this did not happen they had no right to remove me from a carer of whom I needed to be with!
Do you think it is moraly right for a high member of staff to say I do not give a fu*k if you are disabled? Do you think it is right they can refuse to refund you any money which is technically stolen from you? especially when you know this is what happened, Do you think they should of stated if you do not like it go to reception in the morning to resolve? (I do) Do you think it is right for an arcade member of staff to assist in your removal something which they are not trained to do especially with several other security guards standing by as they obviously did not see any issue with me resisting them etc, Do you think it is right for a company to remove you from the premises without asking you to leave? especially were there is much room for this to be asked? Do you think it is right for a security guard or anyone to push you in the back to aid his removal when you are not resisting him?
Would you be happy if the above happened to you?
As for postee number 2,
Sorry op but the way you wrote that letter it just screams put me in the bin. No wonder you're having probelms getting this resolved. If you acted to the staff at the time in the way you come through in the letter you pretty much have no chance of winning round the company.
You won't get anywhere writing things like this:
Assistance arrives in the form of Steven with a very big smirk on his face almost definately a we will not do anything look.
Originally Posted by damos1
Assistance arrives in the form of Steven with a very big smirk on his face almost definately a we will not do anything look..
That really doesn't make you look like a nice person at all and will make anyone who reads it side with (also believe the most) the staff 'Steven' and not you.
The way this op is written is after several months of trying to resolve the issue, eg after haven basically saying we do not want to know eg basically I can only state the incident as it happened and he did indeed do this and I am sure you know the face I mean however this op has only been written the way it has because it is the only way which is pure enough for them to read and get the exact facts overall of what did actually happen.0 -
Freddie_Snowbits wrote: »Here Endeth Today's Lessons!
Quoted JIC
You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.0 -
Pub Quiz tonight, and I think I will put a pound in puggy as well.
Good night all.0 -
Money_User wrote: »You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.
True...but at least the horse would know how to eat food properly !;):rotfl:0 -
-
-
Money_User wrote: »certain Merc thread springs to mind!
In addition to my previous posting, Inchcape have a partnership with Mercedes-Benz as clearly shown on the M/benz website at http://www.mercedes-benz.inchcape.co.uk/; so my email contact info was correct and appropriate on the other thread. I also provided the email address of the Inchcape chairmam.
As advised in my previous posting, I am now awaiting for you to 'name em' but I have got a feeling that it could be a long wait !;):rotfl:0 -
Money_User wrote: »Don't think I'll post them then, if you stop breathing it sould mean no more CEO emails! :rotfl:
As I thought, you can't 'name em' !:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:0 -
I'm just wondering if Damos is trying to make Haven submit due to the amazlingly long posts......The Googlewhacker referance is to Dave Gorman and not to my opinion of the search engine!
If I give you advice it is only a view and always always take professional advice before acting!!!
4 people on the ignore list....Bliss!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards