my son wants to get custody for his son

nottslass_2

Loopy_Girl wrote: »

Oh I know! I was merely keeping the late entrant into the thread up to speed as they seem to have a different take on things!;)

Yes when it was said at the time, I thought that was odd. Particularly as the OP said that she said her Son was there beside her and could he talk to the nurses but he wouldn't get info either?!

TBH I'm begging to think that the OP has real MH issues ( that is not intended as an insult) She appears to be a complete fantasist.

I've noticed that the OP is quite selective when replying to posts and "back tracks" when" suggestions" have been made by posters.

It's strange how she never replies to the posts when somebody Questions a Technicality of a procedure or indeed what a professional has apparently "advised "her, My only guess is because these are the ones that can be proved to be "exaggerated.

gizmo111

It's strange how she never replies to the posts when somebody Questions a Technicality of a procedure or indeed what a professional has apparently "advised "her, My only guess is because these are the ones that can be proved to be "exaggerated

I thought she had me on ignore

I'm going to dip out of this thread now - if the OP needs any help from me then she needs to be open and honest about the things that are happening with SS and not how she would like the situation to be via her own interpretation.

one_hot_minute

Errata wrote: »

Perhaps it was reported to abuse for the abusive and foul language you used ?

I didn't use any foul language neither was I abusive or rude.

Loopy_Girl

one_hot_minute wrote: »

I didn't use any foul language neither was I abusive or rude.

No I don't think you were either as a matter of fact.

Sadly some people get being honest confused with being rude - perhaps you touched a nerve?;)

Fang_3

nottslass wrote: »

TBH I'm begging to think that the OP has real MH issues ( that is not intended as an insult) She appears to be a complete fantasist.

I've noticed that the OP is quite selective when replying to posts and "back tracks" when" suggestions" have been made by posters.

It's strange how she never replies to the posts when somebody Questions a Technicality of a procedure or indeed what a professional has apparently "advised "her, My only guess is because these are the ones that can be proved to be "exaggerated.

There's another word for it - troll.

Loopy_Girl

Fang wrote: »

There's another word for it - troll.

I actually think I would vomit if this was the case.

Trolling is one thing, attention seeking another but to concoct a story about a baby being in danger...sheesh:eek:

VK-2008

i dont know all the rules and regulations but what i would say is do something now
dont wait for the situation to get better or worse
go to a lawyer and get full custody of the baby
people always tend to stick up for the mum your son needs to make it clear he wants to be there
it may cost in lawyers fees but its worth it for the sake of a child

Kulafey

Paracetamol is dangerous if given at a dose higher than recommended or over a long period to babies, children or adults. It can cause permanent liver damage. I have seen many mothers "abuse" calpol, for example, by repeatedly dipping a fretful baby's dummy in it. I'm sure they're trying to help the child, but it can be very dangerous.

Loopy_Girl wrote: »

I have to say that I am confused at the apparant SS involvement but then the OP is having to do all the work to keep the child safe (err sorry, it's her son that wants residency apparantly).

I agree nottslass...there are lots of things that don't make sense and when questioned the OP gets very defensive (I have yet to hear a health professional call Calpol 'dangerous' babies from 8 weeks on).

There have also been some pretty harsh accusations posted such as the baby Mum having sex with a 14 year old:eek: You can't go around saying stuff like that on a forum.

The OP has admitted to mental health problems which she is being treated for and very recently took an overdose - I really would question whether SS would think that the best place for an 8 week old baby would be in that environment.

At the end of the day, if there was a welfare issue then SS would have had the baby out of there. The police and SW don't go chasing for babies and then nothing is done about it.

I echo your closing paragraph nottslass...and if the baby is at risk then to be honest I don't think either Granny should be looking after it. An experienced foster carer would be best for this wee mite at this time.

tweetie_pie_3

pinknfluffy0 wrote: »

Why couldnt he have gone nicely and calmly?

He would of but if you are worried about your child then get told u cant see them would you be happy about that

tweetie_pie_3

one_hot_minute wrote: »

Blue Monkey, with all due respect, I wish you'd stop projecting what's happened to you onto this situation.

I also wish you'd stop assuming that everyone else has it easy because they've not been through what you have. We've all been through traumatic experiences and I for one have been very frightened of someone violent, but I'm not gonna spew it all over this thread. Take the chip off your shoulder please.

And yes, what Nottlass says, he can have the baby overnight but cant visit the hospital? Weird.

We had the baby a lot but because of her banning my son from seeing him cos he didnt invite her to his 18th birthday meal she said he cant c him hospital sed its best as she has care and control but its all sorted now my son has had him 4 nights since last thursday and her step dad the other 3 as she chose to go out on the nights my son didnt have him