Retraction

clutton_2

i wonder who else might think MSEers have become a pain in the derriere this week ??

Sunhil possilby ?

whitewing

lynzpower wrote: »

Should you ever be looking for a HOUSESHARE IN GLASGOW EDINBURGH TWICKENHAM KINGSTON CARDIFF FINSBURY PARK

you better PM me I would love to go into a houseshare with anyone who loves IRD homes as much as I do.

With a bit of luck they might have a 3,4,5,6,7,8,9, bedroom
house
flat
apartment

maybe studentmoneysaver would like to join us, even tho Im sure he has a great LL at the mo, who could pass up the opportunity of living with IRD HOMES!

Im considering doing a
MA
MSC
PHD
at UNIVERSITY
and will be a STUDENT
but also a
PROFESSIONAL at the same time

Sorry to post again, I have another question and for some reason I can't edit my posts on MSE.

I know the OP made the original post, but in terms of legality, am I right in thinking that he would not be legally obliged to post the retraction?

StudentMoneySaver

I'd imagine if Sunil Dhown and IRD Homes attempted to go to court for his 'distress' he would have roundly lost as the original post was based on provable facts. The OP probably didn't want to deal with them any more so the retraction was the easier route (and the most entertaining and damaging for Sunil Dhown and IRD Homes).

sp1987

lynzpower wrote: »

I know you mentioned property, flats houseshares

But would you think IRD LETTINGS also let out luxury ( or even just bog-standard) APARTMENTS?

My favourite part of your post is the fact that someone one day might google 'bog-standard apartments' and end up here :rotfl: :T

Being the letting agents/ property management agents / landlord agents / property marketers / inventory specialists (maybe, I don't know if they do this? But I'll bet if they did they would take the same pride in the work as they do with all other work they do) that they ( IRD ) must be, I am sure there is no mention of 'bog-standard' apartments in their literature.

lynzpower

whitewing wrote: »

lynzpower, you seem to know a lot about these things.

I notice IRD Homes are making a big thing about not requiring a deposit. Obviously I can see the advantage for someone wanting to move in but where would be the advantage for a landlord?

The reason many landlords dont take deposits is so that they dont have to do inventories, dont have to mark fair wear and tear.
Thats a dis-benefit for the tenant at the start, if you think about it.

Yes, as clutton says, a pain the rear to have to prove deductables, oh what a hassle it is these days when you cant just keep the deposit like you used to. Not that that ever happened at SD Investments, Im sure that was a mistake!

lynzpower

Hang on a minute

No one has mentioned the great work of IRD / Lettings Sunhil/Sunil Sunny Dhown

for ages!

We wouldnt want Sunny to think we have stopped loving IRD HOMES now would we?

clutton_2

""The reason many landlords dont take deposits is so that they dont have to do inventories, dont have to mark fair wear and tear.
Thats a dis-benefit for the tenant at the start, if you think about it. ""

its a definite Benefit to the tenant if there is no inventory... no proof of condition on entry therefore no deductions on leaving.....

StudentMoneySaver

Does anyone feel a bit of affection for Sunil Dhown and IRD Homes? He has been part of our lives for almost a week now. His smiley little face (:)), his amazing business acumen and obvious talents in litigation are hard not to love.

I'm sure all their Tenants feel the same, as the OP presumably does.

He truly is a King amongst [STRIKE]turds[/STRIKE] men.

whitewing

For some reason MSE won't let me use the Thanks button. Thank you clutton et al for your posts on potential reasons why IRD Homes don't require a deposit.

Goodnight all!

lynzpower

clutton wrote: »

""The reason many landlords dont take deposits is so that they dont have to do inventories, dont have to mark fair wear and tear.
Thats a dis-benefit for the tenant at the start, if you think about it. ""

its a definite Benefit to the tenant if there is no inventory... no proof of condition on entry therefore no deductions on leaving.....

Yes but it can also mean that damage isnt picked up on, and then if one is to move in and notice a faulty Front door lock for example then the landlord COULD suggest that the incoming tenant has broken it.

Last rental I took there was a world of carp under the stairs that the LL wouldnt remove. There was a rodent in a box :eek:and lots of other suspect stuff

But yes, from a moneysaving POV it can be a a benefit for the tenant. Especially as they dont have to pay for a "check out"

Im sure there is nothing suspect about Sunhil/Sunil Sunny Dhown maintenance of front door locks, pest control, refuse or anything of that nature.