📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Surge Protectors

Options
1234579

Comments

  • this thread is great...i know a lecturer in electrical engineering, he would love this...but i aint gonna do that yet ...as you were :rotfl::rotfl:

    ps...i have made a fire and burnt my surge proectors just in case...did i do right?

    ps ps..mind you i have fitted the kids with lightning conduits just in case
  • Lil306
    Lil306 Posts: 1,692 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    this thread is great...i know a lecturer in electrical engineering, he would love this...but i aint gonna do that yet ...as you were :rotfl::rotfl:

    ps...i have made a fire and burnt my surge proectors just in case...did i do right?

    ps ps..mind you i have fitted the kids with lightning conduits just in case

    Sounds like a good plan, kids are like cats they have nine lives.

    Adults don't, therefore kids have more chance of surviving a lightning strike :D
    Owner of andrewhope.co.uk, hate cars and love them

    Working towards DFD

    HSBC Credit Card - £2700 / £7500
    AA Loans - (cleared £9700)
  • westom
    westom Posts: 29 Forumite
    Basil1234 wrote: »
    westom you ask us to provide numbers we have offered manfuacturers specs which you have completely ignored like and ignorant preaching preist!

    I do not see any numbers. I see "6000 volts 6500 amps" which calculates to 550 joules - near zero protection. I then asked cit_k for the joules number from that UPS. He refuses.

    Exactly which number do you refer? Quote it. Don't waste bandwidth with only a URL or “do a google search”. If a manufacturer spec number makes that claim, then post that number. Tell us specifically which number makes that claim. Telling anyone you just know is classic junk science. Where are the spec numbers?

    Getting upset also wastes bandwidth. If you have spec numbers, then post each spec number in the very first paragraph. How does that near zero 550 joules absorb surges that are hundreds of thousands of joules?

    > I already told you, you can find those numbers very easily with google, ...

    ... is cit_k again admitting he has no numbers. Subjective claims and no numbers. One sentence could provide the numbers. Instead he posts another long diatribe and will not post any relevant spec numbers. He will not even post the joules for his trivial “6000 volts 6500 amp” UPS. Why? Because that joules number says the UPS is near zero protection. So instead, he posts long winded venom.


    That UPS performs one useful function. To provide temporary power during a blackout. To provide opportunity to save unsaved data. So that a rare and destructive surge causes no damage, an informed homeowner earths one ‘whole house’ protector. The effective solution costs about $1 per protected appliance. How much for a UPS? $100 per appliance with near zero protection and no always required short connection to single point earth ground.

    Where are those spec numbers? First paragraph - post spec numbers for protection from each type of surge right there. Its not hard - if those numbers existed. Impossible because those protection specs do not exist.
  • HTML200
    HTML200 Posts: 164 Forumite
    Westom.

    You're arguing that surge protectors are a rip-off.

    Would it be possible to summarise, in a short paragraph, in simple terms, why surge protectors offer no significant protection?
  • D.K.
    D.K. Posts: 596 Forumite
    Westom,
    I'm trying hard to be sympathetic and understanding. My USP solved my problem OK yes?.
    My work is not electronics or computers, it is in mental health.
    As far as I am concerned I'll go to bed tonight and I won't dream of surge protectors.... like you might?
  • westom
    westom Posts: 29 Forumite
    HTML200 wrote: »
    Would it be possible to summarise, in a short paragraph, in simple terms, why surge protectors offer no significant protection?

    It has been summarized in every post. Protection is always about where energy dissipates. A protector is only as effective as its earth ground.

    Or again, how do you identify an ineffective protector. 1) It has no dedicated wire for that always required short connection to single point earth ground. 2) Manufacturer avoids all discussion about the item that provides protection - earth ground. And protector that violates either is ineffective. The NIST (US government research agency) is blunter:
    > A very important point to keep in mind is that your surge protector will work by
    > diverting the surges to ground. The best surge protection in the world can
    > be useless if grounding is not done properly.

    Read only one paragraph or pair of paragraphs. That is one reason why some protectors are only profit centers. Provided are tens of reasons why those protectors are not effective.

    I do not know how I could have posted this any simpler. Every post ends with the only fact all should know. If only told what to know and do not want to know why, then only read this: Protection is always about where energy dissipates. A protector is only as effective as what provides protection - its earth ground.
  • HTML200
    HTML200 Posts: 164 Forumite
    Westom.

    I'll take your final summary and work from the ground up.

    "A protector is only as effective as what provides protection - its earth ground."

    Logically:

    We're talking about protecting an appliance beyond the mains point. That effectively means that some part of the circuit has to determine what is more power than the appliance can safely handle, and then dump the excess 'power' into the earth, rather than channeling it through the appliance.

    That's what power surge protectors claim to do better than than appliances' own power supplies, and I think specifically they claim to be able to handle power spikes more effectively than appliances' own power supply units (PSU's). i.e., they react faster.

    Specifically, what's your evidence against this claim?

    Reading your summarised paragraph, I conclude that any surge protector that has a dedicated earth wire and whose manufacturer does not avoid discussion of the role of the earth wire is therefore not proved as as being a unit that, or being the manufacturer of a unit that, provides inadequate protection.

    You're obviously a logical sort, so I'm sure you'll see the logical truth of my last paragraph.
  • Biggles
    Biggles Posts: 8,209 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    HTML200 wrote: »
    You're obviously a logical sort
    Good grief, where did you get that idea from?
  • HTML200
    HTML200 Posts: 164 Forumite
    Biggles wrote: »
    Good grief, where did you get that idea from?

    I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt.
  • D.K.
    D.K. Posts: 596 Forumite
    OK Weston I'll Join the rest and laugh at your daft logic, if you like, which cannot answer my point.
    Happy with your compulsive behaviours, yeah? You're not making any friends. Nobody agrees with you. Is that OK? Do you think therefore it matters to anyone now , are they really concerned what you say or does that not matter to you? Will you now reply "Show me your figures" or can you be less abrasive and politely accept someone else's opinion?
    I suspect you will find that difficult and suggest you get some help before you don't have a friend left.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.