We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Council Pay Freeze

191012141529

Comments

  • Johnny_Doe
    Johnny_Doe Posts: 302 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    IT IS NOT FREE. Paid for by 6-7.5% contributions taken out salary for a pension that can be reduced by simply making up a silly excuse (happened a couple of years ago). Averages at 4K, no-one looks forward to living in poverty.

    Is this true? do you not have non contributary 45ths or 60ths of final salary? 4k average per annum? seems similar to an average private sector defined contribution scheme?!
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    wxmlad wrote: »
    your not paying me to do sod all, your paying me to work - which i do

    I wouldn't bother mate, you are dealing with the the Daily Mail brigade icon7.gif
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • lemonjelly
    lemonjelly Posts: 8,014 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker Mortgage-free Glee!
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    What has to be considered though. Is that between 1997 and 2007. Half of all new jobs created where in the public sector. Around 500,000.

    With the state of the public finances and reduced taxation income. Julys taxation income was truly shocking. We cannot afford the public sector as it currently stands.

    A way has to be found by cutting costs. If not by jobs then by pay.

    Agree completely. I think that efficiency savings can & should (& indeed will have to be) made.

    My concern though, is that the decision makers who choose where the cuts happen will pick easier options, and protect whatever VI they have. I anticipate they'll cut grants to voluntary organisations and cut services before they cut frivolous jobs which are less urgent.

    This has a knock on effect of increasing the public perception of public sector wastrels.

    A bit like the politicians, it is society's responsibility to fix this, by voting, making representations to MP's, councillors and the like. They work for you, they are public servants too remember. We, as a society should ensure that they remain as public servants, rather than allow them to service their own interests.
    It's getting harder & harder to keep the government in the manner to which they have become accustomed.
  • wxmlad wrote: »
    how do we know you dont sit around doing sod all most of the day.

    You would just be green with envy if I told you what I do all day and I wouldn't be that cruel.
  • Johnny_Doe wrote: »
    Is this true? do you not have non contributary 45ths or 60ths of final salary? 4k average per annum? seems similar to an average private sector defined contribution scheme?!

    Depends whether it's a council pension or Civil Service.
  • wxmlad wrote: »
    your hilarious.........

    ..."you're"
  • You would just be green with envy if I told you what I do all day and I wouldn't be that cruel.

    please tell us
  • the point is, no one is having a go at individuals. people are simply saying the public sector is overblown and employs too many people. whatever it is that you and your "team" does, if you were in the private sector, there would be 50% less of you doing the same thing.


    plus, people also think that if you don't like the public sector pay, then you can leave and work in the private sector. there is a reason why the majority of public sector workers stay in the public sector.
  • StevieJ wrote: »
    I wouldn't bother mate, you are dealing with the the Daily Mail brigade icon7.gif


    i was starting to think that
  • the point is, no one is having a go at individuals. people are simply saying the public sector is overblown and employs too many people. whatever it is that you and your "team" does, if you were in the private sector, there would be 50% less of you doing the same thing.


    plus, people also think that if you don't like the public sector pay, then you can leave and work in the private sector. there is a reason why the majority of public sector workers stay in the public sector.

    I do think its wrong for people to start throwing personal insults just because some works at the council
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.