CP Plus Ltd - 2ND LETTER NOW IN RED!

trisontana

Sobell's latest stunt is to quote "Civil Procedure Rules part 31 and more specifically parts 31.16 and 31.17" . One thing he fails to mention though is that particular rule does not apply to the Small Claims track. How remiss of him!

Oopsadaisy

trisontana wrote: »

That's already been done several times. More specifically about Michael David Sobell (who trades as Graham White Solicitors), Trethowen's tame "legal eagle".

Pretty much a waste of time imo.

weedymuff

Hi everyone

I recently recieved one of these but seems to be slightly different. Mine has a photo of my car entering and leaving a motorway services where I stayed for 4hours. They are saying they will use this evidence against me. Anyone else had this?

AlexisV

They are saying they will use this evidence against me

What, in a blackmail sense? They're photos of your car, not photos of you in a compromising situation on Clapham Common.

Ignore. CP Plus have never ever done court and you don't owe them a penny.

weedymuff

cheers for the reply alexisv, still ignoring, got a new one today about how they will pass this case on to their legal deparment.

Just wondering if anyone else has had a letter that contains photo evidence?

Driver8

weedymuff wrote: »

cheers for the reply alexisv, still ignoring, got a new one today about how they will pass this case on to their legal deparment.

Just wondering if anyone else has had a letter that contains photo evidence?

They haven't got a "Legal department" it's another minimum wage earner sat at the next desk wishing they had another job sending the crap out.

PPC's are private companies purely out to extort you and a photo of a car is not "evidence".

Look, if the PPC's did as they claim and took thousands of people to court, do you not think you may have noticed all the courts being full to the brim each day? Strangely i haven't heard of the courts being clogged up by the filth, they just do not do court as when they try, they lose, it is as simple as that.

Sir_Roger_deLodger

weedymuff wrote: »

Just wondering if anyone else has had a letter that contains photo evidence?

Most of us on here have. Except it isnt "Evidence", it's just a photo of a car.
Legal department my 4rse. Ignore the clowns.

Kite2010

Driver8 wrote: »

They haven't got a "Legal department" it's another minimum wage earner sat at the next desk wishing they had another job sending the crap out.

PPC's are private companies purely out to extort you and a photo of a car is not "evidence".

Look, if the PPC's did as they claim and took thousands of people to court, do you not think you may have noticed all the courts being full to the brim each day? Strangely i haven't heard of the courts being clogged up by the filth, they just do not do court as when they try, they lose, it is as simple as that.

Sometimes it might even be the same minimum wage earner, just putting different headed paper into the printer, the PPCs have got to make savings to cover the lost of income :rotfl:

Coupon-mad

IF YOU ARE READING THIS OLD THREAD ASK YOURSELF WHY?????????????

THIS IS FROM 2009/2010!!!!!

ADVICE CHANGED IN 2013 SO GET YOURSELF ONTO PAGE ONE OF THE FORUM INSTEAD AND READ CURRENT ADVICE IN THE 'PRIVATE PARKING TICKET, OLD OR NEW? NEWBIES PLEASE READ THESE FAQS FIRST!' STICKY THREAD. MY SIGNATURE BELOW TELLS YOU WHERE TO CLICK...


Thanks!


NOW PLEASE STOP READING THIS OLD, OUT OF DATE ADVICE!

angel_islington

PPCHomeTruths wrote: »

Weedy, I think your conscience is telling you to do the right thing and make prompt payment.

Should your conscience not be telling you to crawl back under the rock from whence you came by now?