PPI Reclaiming Discussion part 4

busbyh

Hi can anybody help. I think I have enabled something in my details tat I shouldn't have.
Easch time someone posts on the thread I receive an email advising me of it.
How do I disable this
Thanks
busbyh
x

Sorted my tech problem. I must have ticked a box to subscribe to other threads - e mails. Should leave things alone that I know nothing about:o:D

beaniebabe

pinknico wrote: »

I thought so as you have a number like beaniebabe and hers was sent from the FOS to the FSCS in a batch.

Are most numbers that have been passed from the FOS got similar numbers to Dialysis and me and what does this mean?:o

dialysis

beaniebabe wrote: »

Thanks Amersall
I have a good idea on my rights but OH is not as clued up! Don't worry they will not get away with anything and I will fight them to the end if need be:mad:
Not leaving a name and contact number is totally out of order.
I have since called them and it becomes more confusing as they were so happy to accept the smallest of repayments It makes me wonder sometimes if there is much they can do about the situation themselves since they have gone belly up!!!
Thanks for your support. xx

Hi beaniebabe sorry about the trouble you are having I think it is disgusting how they just turned up at your home. I find it strange though that it was target that turned up I thought they were now called Picture home loans that is who is fighting us for repo whats going on?

beaniebabe

dialysis wrote: »

Hi beaniebabe sorry about the trouble you are having I think it is disgusting how they just turned up at your home. I find it strange though that it was target that turned up I thought they were now called Picture home loans that is who is fighting us for repo whats going on?

My OH said they introduced themselves as being from Target. I know that Target are the company that were used to deal with Picture accounts and can only imagine that this is why they called. Regarding your repo' was this something that started before Picture were declared in default. That might make a difference!
Did you find it easy to get them to accept small offers of repayment because I find this very strange! XX

dialysis

pinknico wrote: »

I thought so as you have a number like beaniebabe and hers was sent from the FOS to the FSCS in a batch.

Pinknico have you not got a number like us and did yours not go to the FOS first?

dialysis

beaniebabe wrote: »

My OH said they introduced themselves as being from Target. I know that Target are the company that were used to deal with Picture accounts and can only imagine that this is why they called. Regarding your repo' was this something that started before Picture were declared in default. That might make a difference!
Did you find it easy to get them to accept small offers of repayment because I find this very strange! XX

They would only accept three quarters of the monthly premium not a small amount. At one point picture told us not to pay anything until our claim was sortedthen they went for repo I think though that they went for repo after target took over It is very strange isnt it?

pinknico

beaniebabe wrote: »

Are most numbers that have been passed from the FOS got similar numbers to Dialysis and me and what does this mean?:o

Sorry beaniebabe, it doesnt mean anything as the reference numbers are not really being used, they say it is date order of receipt.

I just couldnt work out why I had such a low number in August 2008 and you two had quite high numbers in July and August 2008, but as your forms were submitted straight away rather than having a form sent out to you for you to send back then you just would have been given the next number that hadnt been sent out yet but the date would be earlier than someone who had yet to return the form of a lower number. Does that make sense?:o

dialysis

pinknico wrote: »

Sorry beaniebabe, it doesnt mean anything as the reference numbers are not really being used, they say it is date order of receipt.

I just couldnt work out why I had such a low number in August 2008 and you two had quite high numbers in July and August 2008, but as your forms were submitted straight away rather than having a form sent out to you for you to send back then you just would have been given the next number that hadnt been sent out yet but the date would be earlier than someone who had yet to return the form of a lower number. Does that make sense?:o

Pinknico the FSCS did send me a form to fill in that we sent back in august 2008

di3004

beaniebabe wrote: »

You're right Di
I will report them as it can do no harm. Sorry to be a pain but what is the ICO. X:rolleyes:

I think I meant to say Office of Fair Trading....not the ICO.......
silly me lol......:D
The Office of fair trading (OFT) can get involved in these matters but for more information as there is lots of info, check here:
http://www.oft.gov.uk/
and
http://www.oft.gov.uk/search?action=search&pg=1

Yet the ICO can get involved with anything in regards of your data, freedom of information etc.

So its the OFT you need to contact at this point hun and not the ICO lol, sorry hun.:o;)XXXXXXXX

dialysis

di3004 wrote: »

I think I meant to say Office of Fair Trading....not the ICO.......
silly me lol......:D
The Office of fair trading (OFT) can get involved in these matters but for more information as there is lots of info, check here:
http://www.oft.gov.uk/

Yet the ICO can get involved with anything in regards of your data, freedom of information etc.

So its the OFT you need to contact at this point hun and not the ICO lol, sorry hun.:o;)XXXXXXXX

Di you are getting all your icos and ofts mixed up hun lol :rotfl::rotfl: