Zanussi Integrated dishwasher - £94 delivered @ B&Q Possible misprice

amancalledchip

amancalledchip wrote: »

i ordererd the £69 fridge not the dishwasher, and , as yet i hav'nt had an email or credit to my account.Its being delivererd on the 5th fingers crossed

just had a call, my fridge is being delivererd on Tuesday between 8 and 12
Not as bigger bargain as the dishwasher, but £69 for an integrated fridge is still a good deal.

georgemac_2

anyone had any further updates from B & Q?

My credit card has not been refunded, I have had no phone call, have sent B & Q an email on Saturday requesting a delivery date (not much hope I know) but so far no reply?

sanfly

had e mail 29/1 to say they had done a credit transfer back to my card of the £94, still not there this morning, anybody had a sensible response from b&q re them breaking the contract and loss of bargain?

Fantabulous

Has anyone contacted Trading Standards on the B&Q issue by any chance?

YTS

same, as Sanfly. Told would have money credited back but has not. Also told could not supply DW

mattwallisuk

sanfly wrote: »

had e mail 29/1 to say they had done a credit transfer back to my card of the £94, still not there this morning, anybody had a sensible response from b&q re them breaking the contract and loss of bargain?

There TOS clearly states they have not broken a contract (as does most retailers TOS). Their sensible response was the apology about a system error, and a refund of the monies. That is the end of it.

paul.carter

mattwallisuk wrote: »

There TOS clearly states they have not broken a contract (as does most retailers TOS). Their sensible response was the apology about a system error, and a refund of the monies. That is the end of it.

Companies write all sorts in the small print. Doesn't mean that it's legal and that is why we have a system to keep them in check. Often means no more than the current trend for a poster writing 'End of,' or 'That is the end of it,' to try and add some weightor authority to a thought that's popped into their head.

mattwallisuk

Ok in which case feel free to waste your time. Certainly getting a chuckle out of me

taxiphil

Matt Wallis appears to be trolling now. Myself and others have put forward sound legal arguments on this thread as to why B&Q are in breach, but Matt just keeps repeating his mantra "you won't win" without actually citing any statutes or case law to back up his opinion.

Come on Matt, it's time to put up or shut up. Let's hear what you've got. Do you think all the laws I've cited on this thread (Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977, Sale of Goods Act 1979) are a figment of my imagination? Or do you think a county court judge would simply tear up all those laws and decide to invent a new one of his own?

mattwallisuk

Ok enough Trolling, I will wait and see who get an integrated dishwasher our of B&Q for £94... just won't hold my breath