Zanussi Integrated dishwasher - £94 delivered @ B&Q Possible misprice

taxiphil

mattwallisuk wrote: »

Ok enough Trolling, I will wait and see who get an integrated dishwasher our of B&Q for £94... just won't hold my breath

I explained here that it's not the dishwasher we'd be claiming for, it's the "loss of bargain" - i.e. a nice wad of cash instead!

mattwallisuk

Ah yes, even more likely haha.

Fantabulous

taxiphil wrote: »

Matt Wallis appears to be trolling now. Myself and others have put forward sound legal arguments on this thread as to why B&Q are in breach, but Matt just keeps repeating his mantra "you won't win" without actually citing any statutes or case law to back up his opinion.

Come on Matt, it's time to put up or shut up. Let's hear what you've got. Do you think all the laws I've cited on this thread (Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977, Sale of Goods Act 1979) are a figment of my imagination? Or do you think a county court judge would simply tear up all those laws and decide to invent a new one of his own?

Totally agree with you

B&Q have broken the law here

Why hasn't anyone gone to the Sun?

That is the way to get things done

taxiphil

mattwallisuk wrote: »

Ah yes, even more likely haha.

Once again (and this is the third time I've asked you) are you going to back up your argument with any facts / statutes / case law?

Hint: "Because I say so" isn't an argument winner, it's just foot stamping.

mattwallisuk

Nope, nothing to backup, just a hunch.

smk77

mattwallisuk wrote: »

Ok in which case feel free to waste your time. Certainly getting a chuckle out of me

I'm getting a chuckle out of you returning to a thread that is clearly of no interest to you and therefore watching you wasting your time. Got nothing better to do? What a pity.

At least taxiphil is "wasting his time" with the chance that he may get something from this.

B&Q have broken the law. The T&Cs that people have agreed to do appear to cover this scenario, however, the law clearly states otherwise and therefore there is a case.

If this is as clear cut as you seem to think then why don't retailers write T&C that remove their liability completely? Why don't Comet/Currys etc say "if your TV breaks then tough"? Simple..Because by law they have to fix/replace etc if the goods are still within their warranty period.

mattwallisuk

I am ready to be proved wrong and look forward to seeing your cheque for £260 from B&Q for having an item not in stock. Honestly.

chalkysoil

amancalledchip wrote: »

just had a call, my fridge is being delivererd on Tuesday between 8 and 12
Not as bigger bargain as the dishwasher, but £69 for an integrated fridge is still a good deal.

My hob delivery for today has just been cancelled due to snow. I'm in Kent too.

TBeckett100

content removed

Tinman

mattwallisuk wrote: »

I am ready to be proved wrong and look forward to seeing your cheque for £260 from B&Q for having an item not in stock. Honestly.

Leave them to it mate,it gives them something to do.:rolleyes: