Unprovoked assault in Tescos, No CCTV, No Security, No help at all

Brooker_Dave

Lip_Stick wrote: »

I think, if you're a victim of an assualt you can claim for compensation

Demand compensation!!

Brooker_Dave

seanparkin wrote: »

Still not happy with Tesco though.

Shop elsewhere.

Take a minder with you.

Brooker_Dave

seanparkin wrote: »

It's pretty obvious you've just come in this thread not to provide any help, but to cause trouble for no reason whatsoever which is just a bit pathetic really. As such, you're being ignored. Although I could quite easily, I dont need to prove anything to you because as mentioned before, they have the guy and he's admitted everything, and plenty of decent people have given me enough to go on.

Its no real surprise someone hit you.

Tozer

Brooker_Dave wrote: »

Its no real surprise someone hit you.

That's a pretty stupid and ill-founded thing to say. What is your justification for that?

andyrules

Tozer wrote: »

That's a pretty stupid and ill-founded thing to say. What is your justification for that?

He likes to hang around the vent boards making stupid and ill founded comments.

dmg24

andyrules wrote: »

Not necessarily.

DD was walking down the road with some friends when a car drew up next to them, a large guy alighted, rearranged the face of one of the group and drove off. It was a random attack and of course the police were involved (utterly useless) but it was never reported in the paper.

What makes you think all attacks are?

Where did I say that all attacks are reported in the press?

The way that the assault has been portrayed by certain people on this thread made it sound very, very serious. I would expect such a serious attack to be reported in the press.

Tozer

andyrules wrote: »

He likes to hang around the vent boards making stupid and ill founded comments.

Ah thanks for that. Some people seem to have too much time on their hands!

andyrules

dmg24 wrote: »

Where did I say that all attacks are reported in the press?

The way that the assault has been portrayed by certain people on this thread made it sound very, very serious. I would expect such a serious attack to be reported in the press.

Your comment that if the attack had been that serious then it should 'inevitably' have made the papers implies that you think all serious attacks would be reported, and if it hasn't then it isn't serious enough. You said you don't believe him and are still casting doubts in this post - the op has said that he has possible permanent damage to his teeth. That spells out a fairly nasty assault to me, but I don't see how its failure to hit the press is relevant?

I'm not sure either why you feel it necessary to pick fault with my post - I'm merely pointing out that not all serious attacks are reported. To be honest, I find it rather odd that you don't believe the op.