MSE in court,,,

Freddie_Snowbits

I wonder if the Judge will rule in line with the resposne given in the Arkell v Pressdam case in 1971

marleyboy

I dont remember that case mate, damn my ignorance

Freddie_Snowbits

Was a case involving Private Eye and Arkell, where a response was required. One cannot repeat the response, but it was last used on 17th October 2008.

Search for Arkell on this entry

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_Eye

(Note it is a swear word)

Freddie_Snowbits

Was a case involving Private Eye and Arkell, where a response was required. One cannot repeat the response, but it was last used on 17th October 2008.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_Eye#cite_ref-eye1221_11-0

(Note it is a swear word)

Freddie_Snowbits

Oh God I have gone twice

marleyboy

Love it, hilarious!!!!!!!!!!

Bamber19

Guys, give it a break, I keep coming back here thinking i'll get to read another hilarious comment from mdbarber and how he's "really showing them" by keeping a broken item for almost a year.

marleyboy

Were all waiting on that one Bamber19 we are just dusting off the cobwebs for his long awaited return

Maybe he's been charged with contempt and given a custodial sentence.

Freddie_Snowbits

marleyboy wrote: »

Maybe he's been charged with contempt and given a custodial sentence.

You do not think he has been to the PO with one of the other users here and has ended up in Custardy do you?

marleyboy

Freddie_Snowbits wrote: »

You do not think he has been to the PO with one of the other users here and has ended up in Custardy do you?

:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::T