MSE in court,,,

mdbarber

LOL not really but i've just received my advance notice of evidence documents from the defendant re: this thread
http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.html?t=740609
and in them is a print out of the entire thread,, god knows what for

dmg24

mdbarber wrote: »

LOL not really but i've just received my advance notice of evidence documents from the defendant re: this thread
http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.html?t=740609
and in them is a print out of the entire thread,, god knows what for

It certainly won't do you any favours, especially posts such as this:

mdbarber wrote: »

TBH i didnt even read the terms and conditions so i cant have agreed to anything but i did check to see if they had the statutory notice, thats all
Its all far too late for this dude and no offence but when you confused some companies terms for the soga i really think i can't trust you handing out advice on this let alone telling me who is right or wrong

deanos

Yeah it dosent look good , would love to be a fly on the wall on that day in court :rotfl:

mdbarber

dmg24 wrote: »

It certainly won't do you any favours, especially posts such as this:

sorry don't understand, how so?

Brooker_Dave

mdbarber wrote: »

sorry don't understand, how so?

"i didnt even read the terms and conditions so i cant have agreed to anything"

If you get laughed out of court, don't be too surprised.

Brooker_Dave

mdbarber wrote: »

LOL not really but i've just received my advance notice of evidence documents from the defendant re: this thread
http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.html?t=740609
and in them is a print out of the entire thread,, god knows what for

To show that you didn't follow court procedure and send them a letter before action?

mdbarber

Brooker_Dave wrote: »

"i didnt even read the terms and conditions so i cant have agreed to anything"

If you get laughed out of court, don't be too surprised.

Ello dave see you still haven't answered my questions in that post, but cant really see how that affects the case at all, it no criminal offence to be thick,lazy or rushed.

hollydays

You have also accused them of sending you a "semi-threatening letter"

mdbarber

hollydays wrote: »

You have also accused them of sending you a "semi-threatening letter"

sorry thats what the ts guy called it, and tbh i agreed with him, it threatened me with large court costs if if i took this route and lost.
again how does me considering some thing "threatening" help their case at all.

hollydays

Well,threatening is a very strong word with overtones of harassment,but the spoken word,and the written word are two different things.Choose your words more carefully,but that is going to be the least of your problems.
I wonder why you didn't post this letter here then? Were they "threatening" you,or advising you?They might have been protecting you from yourself..

Brooker_Dave

mdbarber wrote: »

Ello dave see you still haven't answered my questions in that post, but cant really see how that affects the case at all, it no criminal offence to be thick,lazy or rushed.

Are you admitting to being thick and lazy?

How will that help with the court??