Seller won't refund unpaid postage

custardy

missile wrote: »

Maybe english is not your first language? :rotfl:

missile wrote: »

It seems RM is at fault. Why should you be out of pocket? but equally why should seller be out of pocket?

Is it really worth whinging on here about £2.10?

custardy wrote: »

rm's at fault because the seller either didnt afix any postage or didnt affix it sufficiently?
unless it was labeled by a po that is

context,put it in context dear

kevinyork

This used to happen a few times when I sent items via a Post Office. They affix a white sticky label rather than stamps and frequently would affix it as though it was the most delicate piece of gold leaf rather than giving the label a good press down. When it goes in the bag with other mail it could get stuck to something else and be pulled off.

If a customer contacted me in such a case I would always refund. A customer has paid a price for the item to be delivered to them and should not incur additional expense. As I had proof of postage and a postage receipt for the amount paid I did try a couple of times to recover it (successfully) but usually just moved on.

missile

custardy wrote: »

context,put it in context dear

If you insist:rolleyes:

Originally Posted by custardy
rm's at fault because the seller either didnt afix any postage or didnt affix it sufficiently?

How many elementary mistakes in one "sentence"?:T

As I said :A

Originally Posted by missile
It seems RM is at fault.

custardy

right so i was questioning your statement but for some reason you cannot see this.

missile

My statement was correct and for some reason you will not admit this.

custardy

how can your statement be correct.'it seems rm is at fault'.you assume that without proof.
my statement shows its the sellers fault unless the postage was applied @ post office counters.
thus covering both scenarios

missile

custardy wrote: »

how can your statement be correct.'it seems rm is at fault'.

see here :rolleyes: >

misterthrifty wrote: »

Just to clarify........the seller has sent me a scan of the recorded receipt stamped by the PO,

custardy

missile wrote: »

see here :rolleyes: >

misterthrifty wrote: »

Just to clarify........the seller has sent me a scan of the recorded receipt stamped by the PO,

sorry didnt know when you posted your pc was fitted with futurepostovision(TM)

DenBo_4

Custardy, don't reply to Missile, he's obviously a troll trying to start an argument! Ignore him, that starves the troll and he will go somewhere else to fight.;)

missile

custardy wrote: »

missile wrote: »

see here :rolleyes: >

misterthrifty wrote: »

Just to clarify........the seller has sent me a scan of the recorded receipt stamped by the PO,
sorry didnt know when you posted your pc was fitted with futurepostovision(TM)

Based on the information supplied by OP and my own experience with the abysmal service provided by RM,

Originally Posted by missile
It seems RM is at fault.

and it seems I was correct - many thanks for your apology :A