We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Full Fibre installation - will they pull through fibre internally?
Comments
-
We've got 70-something Mbit/s FTTC.For 90% of my use I'd probably be OK with 2Mb ADSL, and 56k dialup would suffice if it wasn't for sites (like this one) adding so many bells and whistles. This site could be served adequately by a late-90s phpBB installation, I suspect!The other 10% it the bit with video streaming, but even that would fit into a smaller pipe than my current FTTC.I agree with those who are suggesting that the biggest winners from FTTP are the telcos who can retire all their old kit.N. Hampshire, he/him. Octopus Intelligent Go elec & Tracker gas / Vodafone BB / iD mobile. Ripple Kirk Hill Coop member.Ofgem cap table, Ofgem cap explainer. Economy 7 cap explainer. Gas vs E7 vs peak elec heating costs, Best kettle!
2.72kWp PV facing SSW installed Jan 2012. 11 x 247w panels, 3.6kw inverter. 34 MWh generated, long-term average 2.6 Os.0 -
You mean the old kit that costs more to maintain? Maybe they should let people keep it & pass the extra costs onto them0
-
My line is underground not overhead with an access point near the front door. They wanted to put the socket on the otherside
of the front wall but there are no power points in the area and all my network stuff is at the rear of the property.
Been a while but the first guy came and went without doing anything stating he needed to get openreach out. It
may have been the 2nd or 3rd visit and the guy said the only option was run the cables through the house. He
was on the phone for a while and said if he declines the job it will just get shunted to another engineer until
someone does the job required.
We have 2 master sockets from the days when we had 2 unique lines into the property and they had no issues feeding
a 2nd cable to the rear so puzzled me why they could not run the fibre the same route.
I could understand if there were tight bends etc. but they didn't even try.
I do seem to get more downtime than with the previous FTTC broadband but maybe that's due to them adding more customers?
It's usually late at night where most people are asleep so I notice it more than the average customer with a 9-5 job.Censorship Reigns Supreme in Troll City...0 -
Not clear, did Openreach (or their contractors) eventually run fibre to the back of your property?forgotmyname said:My line is underground not overhead with an access point near the front door. They wanted to put the socket on the otherside
of the front wall but there are no power points in the area and all my network stuff is at the rear of the property.
Been a while but the first guy came and went without doing anything stating he needed to get openreach out. It
may have been the 2nd or 3rd visit and the guy said the only option was run the cables through the house. He
was on the phone for a while and said if he declines the job it will just get shunted to another engineer until
someone does the job required.
We have 2 master sockets from the days when we had 2 unique lines into the property and they had no issues feeding
a 2nd cable to the rear so puzzled me why they could not run the fibre the same route.
I could understand if there were tight bends etc. but they didn't even try.
I do seem to get more downtime than with the previous FTTC broadband but maybe that's due to them adding more customers?
It's usually late at night where most people are asleep so I notice it more than the average customer with a 9-5 job.0 -
I’ve just had superfast fibre broadband with ee although it was openreach who came and installed the new line.
He took down the old phoneline at the pole, put in a new one, then ran the cable above my front window and down to an existing hole in the wall ( from an old sky cable) at my suggestion.
It’s a bit odd in that the box on the wall has to be plugged into a socket as well as the router/hub
Good job I’ve got an extension tower behind the TV!
I’ve had to go and buy a slow speed ethernet port switch for my Salus heating gateway as it can’t cope with the speed. So cable from router into ethernet switch then another into the gateway, which means another gadget plugged in.I have been able to get rid of the ethernet cable from router to tv though, it’s all wireless now.0 -
It isn't odd at all. The data coming over fibre is carried by light. The fibres are optical fibres. This light has to be detected and then converted into electrical signals your router can work with. This requires components that need to be powered. This requires the box be plugged into the mains to get this power.SVaz said:
It’s a bit odd in that the box on the wall has to be plugged into a socket as well as the router/hub
2 -
wongataa said:
It isn't odd at all.SVaz said:
It’s a bit odd in that the box on the wall has to be plugged into a socket as well as the router/hubI can see how it would seem odd.There's no technological reason for the optical-to-electrical conversion to be done by a separate box. They could have built a media converter into the router and then you'd only have one box to plug in.No-one expects the DSL modem to be separate from the router any more, although they were in the early days of DSL.(I can see why, administratively, it could be easier for OR to own the ONT and the ISP then provide an ethernet router that plugs into it, but that's not the only model of service provision that could have been chosen.)N. Hampshire, he/him. Octopus Intelligent Go elec & Tracker gas / Vodafone BB / iD mobile. Ripple Kirk Hill Coop member.Ofgem cap table, Ofgem cap explainer. Economy 7 cap explainer. Gas vs E7 vs peak elec heating costs, Best kettle!
2.72kWp PV facing SSW installed Jan 2012. 11 x 247w panels, 3.6kw inverter. 34 MWh generated, long-term average 2.6 Os.1 -
A vertically integrated provider like Virgin could do away with a separate ONT and just supply a one box ONT/router that the optical fibre plug’s into , but Openreach are forced by Ofcom to operate as a network provider only , not a network and ISP , ( FYI , City Fibre chose to operate in that way but they are not obligated to do so ) .
Because of the way Openreach are forced to be a network only company they need a demarcation point at which their responsibility ends, that’s the ONT ,( then name says it all optical termination termination , if the responsibility ended at the tip of a fibre cable instead of the ONT , and the ISP provided a router with an ONT built in , thier kit would need to be logged with Openreach , that means OR is less secure with other companies components on the PON itself, and if the service is not working how do you differentiate between the problem being on the network, in which case it’s Openreach responsibility or on the router in which case it’s the ISP , and if the consumer changes ISP and mangles the optical fibre plug removing it from the old providers router and plugging it into the new ISP router ( these are delicate and easy damage and susceptible to contamination) , who is responsible for that repair to the optics …..because of those things I’d go along with the poster that said two separate powered devices isn’t odd at all , it’s exactly what you should expect .1 -
The most basic set up most of come into contact with in everday life is when using a lift, you put your hand in front of detector and break the beam, the door does not close.wongataa said:
It isn't odd at all. The data coming over fibre is carried by light. The fibres are optical fibres. This light has to be detected and then converted into electrical signals your router can work with. This requires components that need to be powered. This requires the box be plugged into the mains to get this power.SVaz said:
It’s a bit odd in that the box on the wall has to be plugged into a socket as well as the router/hubPlay with the expectation of winning not the fear of failure. S.Clarke0 -
A little off topic,but having a read of the thread got caught up in it all! This post will be no help to anyone but I am just here to learn about FTTP..wongataa said:
It isn't odd at all. The data coming over fibre is carried by light. The fibres are optical fibres. This light has to be detected and then converted into electrical signals your router can work with. This requires components that need to be powered. This requires the box be plugged into the mains to get this power.SVaz said:
It’s a bit odd in that the box on the wall has to be plugged into a socket as well as the router/hub
I too am baffled,nay,bamboozled by all this ‘plugging into sockets’. Mine was done 2 yrs ago and have upgraded from 150 to 500 thingamejigs 😄..anyway my router is plugged into a socket. The fibre runs through a wall from a pole straight to the router,being plugged into the WAN socket of said router.
so,what’s all this business about needing another power socket. I only need one for the router.
I will be pleased to read comments,just to help me learn about these things. Many thanks0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.6K Spending & Discounts
- 245.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.7K Life & Family
- 259.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

