Parking Ticket UKCPS LTD and Moorside Legal

Coupon-mad

There is no waiting. It's a phone call on the dot of 8.30am (otherwise an hour in a queue) to ask what address the CNBC reckon they sent two letters to. Was there a typo or error, etc.

imsparticus

Thank you, I will forward that on and post when I have received an answer.

imsparticus

Coupon-mad

Apologies for the late reply. 

The Defendant called the CNBC today as you mentioned. The reply was the correct information is on the system,  That's where the two items would have been sent.
The Defendant asked why is it not possible to email the form or acknowledge the form being sent. They replied that's a fair point and it would make sense.

The Defendant can raise a dispute with a N244 and a Fee of £313 and it could take ten weeks to go through and maybe not filed in the Defendants favour.

Thank you for looking.

Coupon-mad

imsparticus said:

Coupon-mad

Apologies for the late reply. 

The Defendant called the CNBC today as you mentioned. The reply was the correct information is on the system,  That's where the two items would have been sent.
The Defendant asked why is it not possible to email the form or acknowledge the form being sent. They replied that's a fair point and it would make sense.

The Defendant can raise a dispute with a N244 and a Fee of £313 and it could take ten weeks to go through and maybe not filed in the Defendants favour.

Thank you for looking.

Yep we know about the fee (unless they qualify for Help With Fees).

There could be a bigger picture here though. I'm wondering if there is a common CNBC issue here with their post:

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6613377/cnbc-losing-the-plot#latest

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6613107/judgement-for-claimant/p1

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/81503487/#Comment_81503487

imsparticus

I completely agree, the defendant has received the same form and having checked the date it claims to reply back before then. Impossible as it was received well after that. 
I appreciate a piece of post can go missing, but not two from the same place. The defendant is perplexed as to how you cannot even defend yourself in this situation and has told CNBC this to no avail.

ChirpyChicken

unlikely i know but i dont suppose you have a copy of the n180 from moorside do you please?

Coupon-mad

imsparticus said:

I completely agree, the defendant has received the same form and having checked the date it claims to reply back before then. Impossible as it was received well after that. 
I appreciate a piece of post can go missing, but not two from the same place. The defendant is perplexed as to how you cannot even defend yourself in this situation and has told CNBC this to no avail.

What happened in the end?

And just a reminder even though this is stressful: while your case is quiet, before the end of next week please please do the government's Public Consultation.

We need every poster to come back & complete this vital Consultation before the deadline.

See this thread: -

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6617396/parking-code-of-practice-consultation-8-weeks-from-11th-july-2025/p1

I'm sure you and the Defendant have strong opinions on some of the questions!

imsparticus

ChirpyChicken and Coupon-mad

My apologies for the late reply. 

Chirpy... I think the Defendant received it by post. Very early on in the procedure, now we know why.

It would save the postal (apparently) issue arising again for the unsuspected and to get cought out by this. As clearly waiting for the CNBC to forward the N180 did not happen. In this instance the case was a slam dunk and waiting for CNBC to send what they should have would not have led to this point. 

Coupon....The Defendant had no choice but to pay and the CCJ was removed swiftly.

Again thank you for all your help with this. Hope all is well.

Coupon-mad

imsparticus said:

ChirpyChicken and Coupon-mad

My apologies for the late reply. 

Chirpy... I think the Defendant received it by post. Very early on in the procedure, now we know why.

It would save the postal (apparently) issue arising again for the unsuspected and to get cought out by this. As clearly waiting for the CNBC to forward the N180 did not happen. In this instance the case was a slam dunk and waiting for CNBC to send what they should have would not have led to this point. 

Coupon....The Defendant had no choice but to pay and the CCJ was removed swiftly.

Again thank you for all your help with this. Hope all is well.

Yes but all is not well in the Government's options assessment: please help:

FIGHTBACK ALERT:

Please do the government's Public Consultation. We need every poster to complete this vital survey before the deadline.

See this thread:

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6617396/parking-code-of-practice-consultation-now-extended-closes-friday-26th-september/p1

We understand that you may need some pointers. It looks laborious, we get that. It doesn't matter; no knowledge is needed except re your own experiences so you can call out a scam industry and you'll protect millions of motorists and help change the law. 

I've written some guidance to help focus new posters on the issues. I've covered almost every question, providing ideas if you agree with our stance on things like DRFs, which we say must be banned.

Ordinary people like you are falling victim to this scam 15 million times per annum. Motorists need your voice added please.

CLOSES ON FRIDAY 26th SEPTEMBER.