We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Have we ever been in a worse car buying era I don't know where to turn next.
Options
Comments
-
WellKnownSid said:Spies said:Goudy said:Spies said:I like driving my EV more than the petrol Clio I had previously but I got extra creature comforts like heated seats, lane keep and radar cruise which aren't exclusive to EVs... my main issue is not the range (100-120mi), its about the crap-shoot when it comes to publicly charging, they're either really expensive or unreliable.
As for competition making public charging cheaper, how exactly is that going to work.
Three of four different company sockets to each lamp post or three of four different company chargers in a car park?
4.29kWp Solar system, 45/55 South/West split in cloudy rainy Cumbria.1 -
Petriix said:. But, even more importantly, a small amount of inconvenience pales into insignificance against the backdrop of catastrophic climate change.2
-
Fossil fuels are a finite resource and subject to geopolitical issues. There's no sensible argument for keeping the nation addicted to them.2
-
WellKnownSid said:Arunmor said:The reason the converts are so keen on EVs is they are not paying their fair share into the 53p/litre fuel duty pot.
If they were I wonder how keen they would be in overpriced EVs?
The niggle, resistance, negativity whatever you want to call it is partly because of this.
Yes I admit there are those that will never accept the idea, but that's not everyone we come across on here.
I guess it could be hard to understand as the "shoe fits" for those that promote or defend them, yet there is a readily accepted notion that if you can't charge at home they probably aren't for you, but there are plenty that can't and won't ever be able to.
I am positive the number of public chargers will increase, there's no argument from me there.
What I don't agree with is they will be as cheap to charge via an on street charger than they would be at home, ever.
So if you have no likely possibility of charging at home, the cost of ownership is never going to be even.
Some realise they are going to have to make a decision that's not going to be popular.
When EV's are the only choice, what happens then?
Try not to think of the EV in it's self but where they live and what are current economics are based on, property.
You can have a car but it's cost to run is actually far far higher then it needs to be, far higher than perhaps living in some other property but you probably can't afford to live in as where you actually live now is far less than you paid and where you want to live is far more than it's ever been plus it comes with some extra taxes.
And what segment of the public is this likely to effect and what will their alternatives be?
I don't need to go into the socio economic status of all the people living in these types of properties really, so lets just say more will likely need an alternative and those options are always subsidised.
But the purse these subsidises come out of have shrunk, obviously. This means the government go after what's left as they are the dripping tap that can be forced open.
It's not that they need to be cheaper than ICE, that's not the point.
It's really the costs of running them need to be more even for everyone. If that is cracked, most but the most ardent naysayer will melt away.
If a wedge is driven in between the differing costs to running them, it's not surprising some aren't fully on board.
There are of course things that can be done to even these costs up, but most aren't commercially viable and public chargers are a commercial operation. It's ok saying it will happen, but no one has yet come up with anything remotely viable.
We're going to be left with a two tier system that really suits no one in the long run.
Those that can't are going to need an alternative paid for by those that can and those that can are going to pay through the nose just to keep one, or better still just have the ability to keep one.
It's not like driveway taxes haven't been on the cards for the likes of Sidiq and other majors.
2 -
In Norway, ICEs aren't banned, just that few want to buy them any more. Per capita they also have five times the number of public chargers than the UK which is telling.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cg52543v6rmo
0 -
I wonder what the difference in cost is between public chargers in Norway and UK0
-
Google is your friend. 2-3 Krone so around 14-21p per kWh
Average household electricity cost per kWh in July 2024 was apparently 17p/kWh
1 -
14-21 pence per kWh compared to what, 60-75 pence per kWh in my local area.
Obviously we're comparing like for like, public on street chargers.
So the home and public charging network are closer in price and the uptake per capita is greater?
Does anyone know if they charge a connection fee like my local chargers?0 -
So when the price here is around 17p maybe more people will change to EVs2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards