PCM UK LTD / MOORSIDE LEGAL CLAIM

Coupon-mad

Recent good WS (may not all be like your case but one will be. Read these threads:

aza123 is recent & has Chan & Akande

Kpmp54 is recent & has Chan & Akande and also Smith, Edward & Wilkinson

mtrolley123 has Mazur.

maxim024 has Mazur.

Le_Kirk

These are regularly held up as good examples for format and style - obviously content is as per YOUR defence and situation: -

@maxim024 and @aza123

@aza123 includes Chan & Akande

MrTottenham123

Thanks both! Work systems are down this morning so I've got some time now to sit and read through these and get a start on mine. Hopeful to get these sent out this evening. 

Am I still also sending a copy to the claimants (and judge of course) despite them not even bothering to send me a copy of their WS / evidence? 

MrTottenham123

Also with some of these WS' I'm seeing a lot of users going into detail as to why they were parked in that location and then adding in some concerns in regards to poor lighting and/or signage and then obviously the Chan & Akande case law. 

However with my defence one of the main focuses was on the awful POC and how I could not determine which incident occured for a matter over 3 years ago. But if I now start advising in POC that this is why I was parked in that location, lack of signage in the area does this not then contradict what was (or wasn't) put in my defence? 

I don't want the judge to think well he couldn't understand what incident it was with the awful POC but a couple of months later he now knows the full reasoning why he was there etc.

Coupon-mad

You can certainly state that the POC are so poor and it's so long ago that there are insufficient facts, no evidence has been supplied at pre-action stage and there are also no actual POC allegations to respond to. 

Gr1pr

MrTottenham123 said:

Am I still also sending a copy to the claimants (and judge of course) despite them not even bothering to send me a copy of their WS / evidence? 

Yes, to the lawyers involved, Moorside   ?   ( or claimant if no lawyers are involved   ) plus to the civil court,  usually it's one email,  one attachment,  2 destinations 

MrTottenham123

Coupon-mad said:

You can certainly state that the POC are so poor and it's so long ago that there are insufficient facts, no evidence has been supplied at pre-action stage and there are also no actual POC allegations to respond to. 

Yeah I’m going to focus on this, because how can I physically respond with the lack of info they’ve given for an incident 3+ years ago. That includes the woeful POC & the lack of evidence provided at pre action.

Thanks both! I will get a draft copy done this weekend and posted for a check over