We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Landis GYR+ E470 Type 5394

Options
13567

Comments

  • Chris_b2z
    Chris_b2z Posts: 176 Forumite
    100 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    It's a bit of a long shot, but the Landis+Gyr E470 User Manual suggests that the Event Log can be accessed from the customer menu. Hopefully, it hasn't been cleared or wrapped around. It would be interesting to see if there were any entries around the dates in question.
  • mmmmikey
    mmmmikey Posts: 2,318 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Homepage Hero Name Dropper
    Apologies if I've missed something in an earlier post, but I wonder if it's possible that this is a problem that is upstream somewhere from the meter - e.g. the meter itself is fine but the billing is based on data from someone else's meter due to an admin issue in the billing system? If you haven't done so already it's worth checking that the readings on the meter correspond to the readings on the bills.
  • BarelySentientAI
    BarelySentientAI Posts: 2,448 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 6 July 2024 at 8:57PM
    victor2 said:
    You would like to think that somebody in a position at the supplier to actually think about those readings would realise they cannot possibly be true.
    Take 03/01/2024 from 00:30 to 01:00, where the meter reported usage of 16.653kWh. That's an average of 138.8A at 240V for the 30 minute period. Aren't those meters rated at 100A maximum?

    I have no idea how those meters work, but is it at all possible for some sort of external influence to cause them to generate false readings? Unfortunate in a way, that the problem hasn't obviously repeated itself since January, and presumably a meter test now would indicate it is working just fine.
    I have several theories how - some of which I can replicate and some I can't yet. 

    Most result in a sudden step change to the meter, not a long period of high readings, but a couple could theoretically result in what's happened here. 

    Have been used previously to include a high electricity bill in an insurance claim.
  • Qyburn
    Qyburn Posts: 3,583 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper

    I find myself wondering how much electricity it is possible for you to use?  If you turned on your oven, all the rings on your hob, your immersion heater and a couple of fan heaters would even that get you up to 14 kW?  
    It was recording 14kWh in 1/2 an hour, that's 28kW.
  • Reed_Richards
    Reed_Richards Posts: 5,286 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Qyburn said:

    I find myself wondering how much electricity it is possible for you to use?  If you turned on your oven, all the rings on your hob, your immersion heater and a couple of fan heaters would even that get you up to 14 kW?  
    It was recording 14kWh in 1/2 an hour, that's 28kW.
    Yes, you're absolutely right.  Apologies, silly of me.  I just can't get my head around any set of circumstances that could possibly draw so much power in any normal house or anything that could cause an electricity meter to give false readings for a few days before going back to normal.
    Reed
  • Reed_Richards
    Reed_Richards Posts: 5,286 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I've been racking my brains about this one.  The only thing I came up with was a memory that this meter had had reported issues associated with a moving decimal point, that the number of digits after the decimal point had changed in a few cases.  Seemingly this would only apply to manual readings but the cause appeared to be a remotely applied update to the meter software.  Could it be that there was some wrong remote "update" applied to this meter that was pulled a few days later?    
    Reed
  • victor2
    victor2 Posts: 8,121 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 7 July 2024 at 8:13AM
    I've been racking my brains about this one.  The only thing I came up with was a memory that this meter had had reported issues associated with a moving decimal point, that the number of digits after the decimal point had changed in a few cases.  Seemingly this would only apply to manual readings but the cause appeared to be a remotely applied update to the meter software.  Could it be that there was some wrong remote "update" applied to this meter that was pulled a few days later?    
    But such an issue wouldn't result in a sequence of high readings, would it? 

    I’m a Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on the In My Home MoneySaving, Energy and Techie Stuff boards. If you need any help on these boards, do let me know. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any posts you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com. 

    All views are my own and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.

  • I've been racking my brains about this one.  The only thing I came up with was a memory that this meter had had reported issues associated with a moving decimal point, that the number of digits after the decimal point had changed in a few cases.  Seemingly this would only apply to manual readings but the cause appeared to be a remotely applied update to the meter software.  Could it be that there was some wrong remote "update" applied to this meter that was pulled a few days later?    
    My theory is to do with saturation of the measuring circuit from electrical "noise" on the grid.  I've seen sudden voltage changes make a meter jump up, but that can't have happened here as it's a continuous high reading, so I'd be leaning towards considering a high harmonic current contribution making the measurement circuits incorrectly interpret the power-frequency current.

    They're only tested for accuracy at a set range of harmonic contributions (a little wider than what are actually allowed on the system), so if there was a persistent harmonic source causing the local contributions to be driven above the allowable range, perhaps this could have caused a longer period of "running too fast".

    Most other faults are transient (or very short term) but harmonics can be persistent across longer periods.
  • Reed_Richards
    Reed_Richards Posts: 5,286 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 7 July 2024 at 11:12AM
    I have no idea @victor2, my theory is pure conjecture.  I imagined a meter getting a bad software update that would cause all subsequent readings to be wrong.  But then this update is rescinded a few days later.  In this imaginary scenario, somebody in the Smart Meter division of the supplier makes a mistake and sends the meter the wrong software or a corrupt update.  A few days later they realise their mistake and set the meter back to the way it was before.  But they don't want to get into trouble so don't report what they did.   
    Reed
  • WBCPB
    WBCPB Posts: 493 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 7 July 2024 at 1:57PM
    a high harmonic current contribution making the measurement circuits incorrectly interpret the power-frequency current.


    Qué ???????
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.