DCB Legal Court Date March Resident

Colonizemars

What are your thoughts ? I really need to submit this today and haven’t got a clue when it comes to witness statements would really appreciate any pointers. Made more difficult as I’m out of the country with my 3 small children on a time difference 

Edmonton still not answering 

Coupon-mad

"DCB Legal LTD (Claimant)"

No they aren't.

Colonizemars

Coupon-mad said:

"DCB Legal LTD (Claimant)"

No they aren't.

Will change that now. Thank you. Any other advice ?

because they have discontinued 1 claim and partially discontinued another do you think it’s worth emailing them to encourage to discontinue this one 

Coupon-mad

You don't need Exhibits 2, 3, or 4 nor do you need paragraphs 5, 6 or 7.

Instead use the SINGLE PDF 'judgments' link by @Le_Kirk as exhibit 1 and change your blurb about Chan to make it clear that there are now TWO appeal judgments that support striking the claim out:

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/80938365/#Comment_80938365

because they have discontinued 1 claim and partially discontinued another do you think it’s worth emailing them to encourage to discontinue this one?

Yes.

1505grandad

I assume the following is a c & p error and not relevant:-

Para 36

"The signage in this case required customers to enter their vehicle registration number at a kiosk inside the store. Unfortunately, this kiosk was inaccessible to me as the store was closed, rendering compliance impossible.  I also wish to highlight the presence of a sign in the parking area that mentioned clamping. The use of clamping as a penalty for...."

Colonizemars

Coupon-mad said:

You don't need Exhibits 2, 3, or 4 nor do you need paragraphs 5, 6 or 7.

Instead use the SINGLE PDF 'judgments' link by @Le_Kirk as exhibit 1 and change your blurb about Chan to make it clear that there are now TWO appeal judgments that support striking the claim out:

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/80938365/#Comment_80938365

because they have discontinued 1 claim and partially discontinued another do you think it’s worth emailing them to encourage to discontinue this one?

Yes.

Okay just so I’m clear I’m deleting the Chan Para and changing that to outline that the claimant has discontinued to claims against me for the same building that I resided in?

Colonizemars

1505grandad said:

I assume the following is a c & p error and not relevant:-

Para 36

"The signage in this case required customers to enter their vehicle registration number at a kiosk inside the store. Unfortunately, this kiosk was inaccessible to me as the store was closed, rendering compliance impossible.  I also wish to highlight the presence of a sign in the parking area that mentioned clamping. The use of clamping as a penalty for...."

Yes correct have removed para 36 now thank you for pointing this out 

Coupon-mad

Colonizemars said:

Coupon-mad said:

You don't need Exhibits 2, 3, or 4 nor do you need paragraphs 5, 6 or 7.

Instead use the SINGLE PDF 'judgments' link by @Le_Kirk as exhibit 1 and change your blurb about Chan to make it clear that there are now TWO appeal judgments that support striking the claim out:

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/80938365/#Comment_80938365

because they have discontinued 1 claim and partially discontinued another do you think it’s worth emailing them to encourage to discontinue this one?

Yes.

Okay just so I’m clear I’m deleting the Chan Para and changing that to outline that the claimant has discontinued to claims against me for the same building that I resided in?

No. Why delete a paragraph I didn't mention? 

Colonizemars

Coupon-mad said:

Colonizemars said:

Coupon-mad said:

You don't need Exhibits 2, 3, or 4 nor do you need paragraphs 5, 6 or 7.

Instead use the SINGLE PDF 'judgments' link by @Le_Kirk as exhibit 1 and change your blurb about Chan to make it clear that there are now TWO appeal judgments that support striking the claim out:

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/80938365/#Comment_80938365

because they have discontinued 1 claim and partially discontinued another do you think it’s worth emailing them to encourage to discontinue this one?

Yes.

Okay just so I’m clear I’m deleting the Chan Para and changing that to outline that the claimant has discontinued to claims against me for the same building that I resided in?

No. Why delete a paragraph I didn't mention? 

So when you say “change your blurb” you mean just add to the chan paragraph 

Coupon-mad

Yes. Make it all make sense.  Not everything needs a template.