We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Barclays £175 switch offer - new customers only, Nov 1 - 30 2023
Comments
-
Resolver isn't a company like say Citizens Advice, it has no powers. It literally just forwards your complaint to the firm. Your example is almost certainly because it auto forwarded the complaint to the ombudsman (which you could have done yourself as soon as you reached deadlock with the firm). You should understand what a website is and does before you give it personal data - it's a third party tool that harvests your data, anonymises it, and sells it to firms to make money. There is literally zero reason to involve a third party company when you can complain direct to the firm and use the ombudsman if the firm refuses to engage, all you are doing is complicating matters by involving a third party and hoping they pass your details on correctlyharz99 said:
I beg to differ, Resolver sorted out a refund problem with a duff mobile phone that the supplying company had refused to give me, having already exhausted that companies complaints procedure.Nasqueron said:
No don't use Resolver - all it does is harvest your data which is then anonymised and sold to third parties to raise money. It's always, 100% of the time, better to complain directly so there is no issue of confusion or worry about things being sent to the wrong place. Involving a third party in a simple transaction is unnecessaryMABLE said:
No use Resolve.Chambray54 said:
Thank you for the advice, do I file a complain directly to them?said:Complain formally, documenting every single misstep of theirs and the consequential time and effort expended on your part. I was compensated £100.
However, afaik Resolver shouldn't be used until the complainer has exhausted ( or at least tried) the company or Institution's complaints procedure, and has evidence of having done that.Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0 -
Worked for me though! You appear to have a bit of an obsession against Resolver...they may well sell your anonymous data on, but why worry if it's anonymous.Nasqueron id:
Resolver isn't a company like say Citizens Advice, it has no powers. It literally just forwards your complaint to the firm. Your example is almost certainly because it auto forwarded the complaint to the ombudsman (which you could have done yourself as soon as you reached deadlock with the firm). You should understand what a website is and does before you give it personal data - it's a third party tool that harvests your data, anonymises it, and sells it to firms to make money. There is literally zero reason to involve a third party company when you can complain direct to the firm and use the ombudsman if the firm refuses to engage, all you are doing is complicating matters by involving a third party and hoping they pass your details on correctlyharz99 said:
I beg to differ, Resolver sorted out a refund problem with a duff mobile phone that the supplying company had refused to give me, having already exhausted that companies complaints procedure.Nasqueron said:
No don't use Resolver - all it does is harvest your data which is then anonymised and sold to third parties to raise money. It's always, 100% of the time, better to complain directly so there is no issue of confusion or worry about things being sent to the wrong place. Involving a third party in a simple transaction is unnecessaryMABLE said:
No use Resolve.Chambray54 said:
Thank you for the advice, do I file a complain directly to them?said:Complain formally, documenting every single misstep of theirs and the consequential time and effort expended on your part. I was compensated £100.
However, afaik Resolver shouldn't be used until the complainer has exhausted ( or at least tried) the company or Institution's complaints procedure, and has evidence of having done that.0 -
I simply don't see any point in using a third party to pass on your data to a company rather than complaining direct. There is a non-zero chance of something going wrong using a middleman to do something you can do direct.harz99 said:
Worked for me though! You appear to have a bit of an obsession against Resolver...they may well sell your anonymous data on, but why worry if it's anonymous.Nasqueron id:
Resolver isn't a company like say Citizens Advice, it has no powers. It literally just forwards your complaint to the firm. Your example is almost certainly because it auto forwarded the complaint to the ombudsman (which you could have done yourself as soon as you reached deadlock with the firm). You should understand what a website is and does before you give it personal data - it's a third party tool that harvests your data, anonymises it, and sells it to firms to make money. There is literally zero reason to involve a third party company when you can complain direct to the firm and use the ombudsman if the firm refuses to engage, all you are doing is complicating matters by involving a third party and hoping they pass your details on correctlyharz99 said:
I beg to differ, Resolver sorted out a refund problem with a duff mobile phone that the supplying company had refused to give me, having already exhausted that companies complaints procedure.Nasqueron said:
No don't use Resolver - all it does is harvest your data which is then anonymised and sold to third parties to raise money. It's always, 100% of the time, better to complain directly so there is no issue of confusion or worry about things being sent to the wrong place. Involving a third party in a simple transaction is unnecessaryMABLE said:
No use Resolve.Chambray54 said:
Thank you for the advice, do I file a complain directly to them?said:Complain formally, documenting every single misstep of theirs and the consequential time and effort expended on your part. I was compensated £100.
However, afaik Resolver shouldn't be used until the complainer has exhausted ( or at least tried) the company or Institution's complaints procedure, and has evidence of having done that.
Resolver didn't do anything you couldn't have done yourself, it's literally a website that forwards your complaint to the company, they do nothing else, at all, with your complaint until 8 weeks when they may forward the complaint to the ombudsman (which you can also do yourself).
Why give Resolver your personal data at all, regardless of what they then do with it?Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0 -
That’s who I took it too last week. See what they saymiller said:
This practice (institutions unilaterally closing complaints) should be stopped, Barclays are not the only ones. Alternatively, any complaint closed unilaterally could be treated as a Final Response and open up the FOS route.adamp87 said:Barclays complaint handling is absolutely atrocious in my experience sometimes closing the complaint without even speaking to you and saying they are glad you had a chat2 -
After posting on this forum and reading your informed comments I complained to Barclays and it was only yesterday the case was closed. They could not understand why the £5 was not being charged and could not give a satisfactorily explanation why the Blue Rewards Cash back account just disappeared. However they have assured me that this has not affected the 5.12 percent interest on the Rainy Savings account.masonic said:
Several including myself have reported seeing the Blue Rewards account listed after it had been closed. If you had met the criteria, the fee would have been taken, I suggest keeping an eye out for your next interest payment as closure of the Cashback Rewards account is not a good sign (normally happens a couple of weeks after Blue Rewards is ended).CRISPIANNE3 said:
I have met the criteria and paid in more than the required amount hence the reason I get a preferential rate on the saving account. Also the Blue Rewards account is still open.masonic said:
Presumably because you never met the criteria for Blue Rewards. It is covered in the T&C that they will close accounts where you haven't paid in the required £800 per month etc.CRISPIANNE3 said:All very strange but we are talking Barclays here. I opened an account late November 2023 and at the same time opened the Reward, cash back account and Rainy day saver. I have been enjoying the preferential rate on the savings account by opening the Reward account.
Checking they have never taken the monthly £5 fee and note today they have closed down my cash back account without warning.
However happy to keep them for the savings side.
The IT dept have now carried out some modifications to the accounts and the Cash back account seems to be ok now. However they are not certain if the £5 will be taken until next month. As I pay sufficient into the account each month that really is not an issue plus the direct debits are taken each month.
They confirmed that my complaint has been upheld and have offered me compensation for the inconvenience.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

