We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Barclays £175 switch offer - new customers only, Nov 1 - 30 2023
Comments
-
Thank you for the advice, do I file a complain directly to them?said:Complain formally, documenting every single misstep of theirs and the consequential time and effort expended on your part. I was compensated £100.
0 -
No use Resolve.Chambray54 said:
Thank you for the advice, do I file a complain directly to them?said:Complain formally, documenting every single misstep of theirs and the consequential time and effort expended on your part. I was compensated £100.0 -
To complain directly you can only use the chat function in the app (horrendous I think it is, never seems to keep the chat for the next advisor so you have to start again) or a written letter or telephone.There appeals to be no email or contact form
Barclays complaint handling is absolutely atrocious in my experience sometimes closing the complaint without even speaking to you and saying they are glad you had a chat0 -
This practice (institutions unilaterally closing complaints) should be stopped, Barclays are not the only ones. Alternatively, any complaint closed unilaterally could be treated as a Final Response and open up the FOS route.adamp87 said:Barclays complaint handling is absolutely atrocious in my experience sometimes closing the complaint without even speaking to you and saying they are glad you had a chat
2 -
No don't use Resolver - all it does is harvest your data which is then anonymised and sold to third parties to raise money. It's always, 100% of the time, better to complain directly so there is no issue of confusion or worry about things being sent to the wrong place. Involving a third party in a simple transaction is unnecessaryMABLE said:
No use Resolve.Chambray54 said:
Thank you for the advice, do I file a complain directly to them?said:Complain formally, documenting every single misstep of theirs and the consequential time and effort expended on your part. I was compensated £100.Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
1 -
Trouble is that Barclays complaints procedure allows submission by online chat (see above for how effective this is) or by mail. You mention "things being sent to the wrong place", I've found three separate mail addresses for complaints, presumably for different product lines, but it's far from obvious which is which.Nasqueron said:
No don't use Resolver - all it does is harvest your data which is then anonymised and sold to third parties to raise money. It's always, 100% of the time, better to complain directly so there is no issue of confusion or worry about things being sent to the wrong place. Involving a third party in a simple transaction is unnecessaryMABLE said:
No use Resolve.Chambray54 said:
Thank you for the advice, do I file a complain directly to them?said:Complain formally, documenting every single misstep of theirs and the consequential time and effort expended on your part. I was compensated £100.0 -
Yes use it if want a result.Nasqueron said:
No don't use Resolver - all it does is harvest your data which is then anonymised and sold to third parties to raise money. It's always, 100% of the time, better to complain directly so there is no issue of confusion or worry about things being sent to the wrong place. Involving a third party in a simple transaction is unnecessaryMABLE said:
No use Resolve.Chambray54 said:
Thank you for the advice, do I file a complain directly to them?said:Complain formally, documenting every single misstep of theirs and the consequential time and effort expended on your part. I was compensated £100.0 -
I beg to differ, Resolver sorted out a refund problem with a duff mobile phone that the supplying company had refused to give me, having already exhausted that companies complaints procedure.Nasqueron said:
No don't use Resolver - all it does is harvest your data which is then anonymised and sold to third parties to raise money. It's always, 100% of the time, better to complain directly so there is no issue of confusion or worry about things being sent to the wrong place. Involving a third party in a simple transaction is unnecessaryMABLE said:
No use Resolve.Chambray54 said:
Thank you for the advice, do I file a complain directly to them?said:Complain formally, documenting every single misstep of theirs and the consequential time and effort expended on your part. I was compensated £100.
However, afaik Resolver shouldn't be used until the complainer has exhausted ( or at least tried) the company or Institution's complaints procedure, and has evidence of having done that.0 -
Resolver picks the email address it wants to send it to - how do you know which of the 3 is right or which Resolver sends it to? It's far simpler to just use the complaints process directly - chat, mail or phoneflaneurs_lobster said:
Trouble is that Barclays complaints procedure allows submission by online chat (see above for how effective this is) or by mail. You mention "things being sent to the wrong place", I've found three separate mail addresses for complaints, presumably for different product lines, but it's far from obvious which is which.Nasqueron said:
No don't use Resolver - all it does is harvest your data which is then anonymised and sold to third parties to raise money. It's always, 100% of the time, better to complain directly so there is no issue of confusion or worry about things being sent to the wrong place. Involving a third party in a simple transaction is unnecessaryMABLE said:
No use Resolve.Chambray54 said:
Thank you for the advice, do I file a complain directly to them?said:Complain formally, documenting every single misstep of theirs and the consequential time and effort expended on your part. I was compensated £100.
https://www.barclays.co.uk/complaints/
An online chat direct with the bank is far simpler and you can put complaints in formally, after that you will have the details for communications
Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0 -
Resolver is literally a website that takes your details and forwards it to the bank.MABLE said:
Yes use it if want a result.Nasqueron said:
No don't use Resolver - all it does is harvest your data which is then anonymised and sold to third parties to raise money. It's always, 100% of the time, better to complain directly so there is no issue of confusion or worry about things being sent to the wrong place. Involving a third party in a simple transaction is unnecessaryMABLE said:
No use Resolve.Chambray54 said:
Thank you for the advice, do I file a complain directly to them?said:Complain formally, documenting every single misstep of theirs and the consequential time and effort expended on your part. I was compensated £100.
That is it.
It has no special powers, there is no "weight" behind it, it's an unnecessary middleman that achieves nothing different from raising the complaint directly, except your personal data is anonymised and sold off to make Resolver money.
There is zero reason to use a third party to raise a complaint which you can do directly with the bank without your personal data being soldSam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards


