We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
Quick question for anyone at the Directions Questionnaire stage...
I have logged into the Moneyclaim website this evening to take a quick look at where things are. I submitted the N180 to the court via e-mail on 21st April and received the an auto-reply confirmation but nothing further.
Since then, the lovely people at VCS have sent me the usual "Elms aren't representing this anymore, please give us £195 to go away" letter. Thanks but erm, I'll see you in court.
What concerns me now is that on the summary page, the 'Latest Document' entry has gone back to 'Acknowledgement of Service'. On selecting the case, the only option available to me is to view the AOS. The claim history still shows the original timeline of documents sent/received with the DQ being sent on the 8th April as the last entry.
Is this something that has been seen before as I don't want this to somehow get missed and end up with a judgement entered against me...
Thanks as always, Rich
I don't know about this 'Latest Document' thing, but your Claim History seems to be in order.
Look at it this way...
If the CNBC hadn't received your Defence then they would not have sent out Directions Questionnaires.
VCS/Excel did file their DQ (not that I've actually seen a copy!).
In a load of e-mails I had late last week, there contained an unexpected and rather officious e-mail from the court with details of a telephone appointment for mediation. Whilst I'm aware that mediation is now a compulsory stage in claims, I have contacted the court to state that this is an old case and to question if mediation is indeed mandatory in this case. I made it clear again that mediation is not suitable in this case as middle ground will never be found and I don't want to waste court resource as an appointment is a waste of time. If mediation is a requirement, I have requested the appointment they are quite rudely foisting on me is moved as I will be abroad and don't wish to pay to make my phone available in the country I'll be in.