Bailiff Knocked on the door yesterday

JacksSon

Coupon-mad said:

As seen in @SoJacob's similar case, this can be set aside and the monies refunded.
xxxxxx

wouldn't it be the case where the refundable amount would be only those owing to DCBL  919 £ and the difference remains to bailiff representative as he has done his part of the job?

Coupon-mad

 Not messed up.

With your application N244 did you send a WITNESS STATEMENT yet?

JacksSon

Coupon-mad said:

 Not messed up.

With your application N244 did you send a WITNESS STATEMENT yet?

Yep, Both WS and Draft and plenty proof of address + proof that DCBL knew my actual address. I'm thinking about making some changes to WS and draft as when i have sent those the case was a bit simplier. No 275 charge no 1600 to bailiff and obviously no rude visit to my door. I suppose i'll have to ask you (people with big heart) for some tips 
Many thanks

Grizebeck

@Coupon-mad
I dont actually understand the exact fee structure and what can be charged at what stage. All i know is the a set fee they can charge at initial vist, controlling  goods etc.

 I just know how to deal with HCEOs 🤣

Coupon-mad

I've emailed you about something urgent to do with these 2 DCB Writ cases, @Grizebeck.

Grizebeck

Coupon-mad said:

I've emailed you about something urgent to do with these 2 DCB Writ cases, @Grizebeck.

Thanks have replied will sort first thing!

JacksSon

Hi to all, from many threads that i have read on MSE it looks like DCBl changes the tactics lately. Became more aggresive in my opinion!

patient_dream

JacksSon said:

Hi to all, from many threads that i have read on MSE it looks like DCBl changes the tactics lately. Became more aggresive in my opinion!

Yes and that is funny ..... would explain why they get spanked in court and discontinue so often

Coupon-mad

JacksSon said:

Hi to all, from many threads that i have read on MSE it looks like DCBl changes the tactics lately. Became more aggresive in my opinion!

I've noticed it too.

They also appear to now dominate this market, which is unhealthy.

They were even shown last month to have issued claims (for the first time) on behalf of both CEL and ParkingEye who have their own in-house legal teams and have NEVER previously farmed out litigation.

Looks like anti-competitive behaviour to me.

Grizebeck

Coupon-mad said:

JacksSon said:

Hi to all, from many threads that i have read on MSE it looks like DCBl changes the tactics lately. Became more aggresive in my opinion!

I've noticed it too.

They also appear to now dominate this market, which is unhealthy.

They were even shown last month to have issued claims (for the first time) on behalf of both CEL and ParkingEye who have their own in-house legal teams and have NEVER previously farmed out litigation.

Looks like anti-competitive behaviour to me.

I guess it may prove more cost effective