UKPC sent County Court Business Centre letter - what do I do?

The_Loner

Not displaying a blue badge correctly is part of the new CoP, these are on hold awaiting approval but they should be considered, it’s a minor human error IMO.

nickkinix

Does the witness statement read OK otherwise? I've printed a copy as not sure if they need it printed or on email. I've saved as a PDF so can send on email if it's OK to send that way. Assuming all OK I will send to the court and the other side. 

nickkinix

Or should I wait to see their statement first? 

The_Loner

I’m sure the experts will check your WS, when do you need to serve by ?

nickkinix

The 28th so got some time yet

1505grandad

UKPC are BPA AoS members so no good using IPC CoP for anything.

Also a quick read and this stood out:-

"Parking Eye Ltd v Beavis (2015) KSC67......"

Did you copy and paste from a WS used as an example by the forum  -  if so wonder where the "K" came from here "KSC67". 

nickkinix

1505grandad said:

UKPC are BPA AoS members so no good using IPC CoP for anything.

Also a quick read and this stood out:-

"Parking Eye Ltd v Beavis (2015) KSC67......"

Did you copy and paste from a WS used as an example by the forum  -  if so wonder where the "K" came from here "KSC67". 

Ahh the K has probably jumped in from where I was trying to letter my evidence. I will amend that one.
I didn't realise with the ipc stuff , is there a better, more appropriate one somewhere instead? 

Coupon-mad

Yep you want the BPA CoP that was valid in 2019 (Google it) and you should use the section about disabled motorists, which (helpfully for your case!) states that a full t&cs contractual sign must be visible from the driver's seat without getting out of the car, when parked in an accessible bay.

Without that sign in view, it is untrue for the Claimant to say you "agreed to pay £100" because that term wasn't anywhere near!  Impossible that you accepted a contract.

Para 22 needs a small edit because the false £70 add on 'fee' us not actually banned yet.  Expected to be banned or 'intended by Parliament to be banned as part of the new statutory Code' would be true.

You've missed out the usual points about lack of fair ADR and lack of landowner authority that I believe are in the WS bundles by @aphex007 and @SJRRJS.

You know that rejection letter you never got...what are the 3 middle numbers in that POPLA code before the 9 (for 2019)? 

nickkinix

Coupon-mad said:

Yep you want the BPA CoP that was valid in 2019 (Google it) and you should use the section about disabled motorists, which (helpfully for your case!) states that a full t&cs contractual sign must be visible from the driver's seat without getting out of the car, when parked in an accessible bay.

Without that sign in view, it is untrue for the Claimant to say you "agreed to pay £100" because that term wasn't anywhere near!  Impossible that you accepted a contract.

Para 22 needs a small edit because the false £70 add on 'fee' us not actually banned yet.  Expected to be banned or 'intended by Parliament to be banned as part of the new statutory Code' would be true.

You've missed out the usual points about lack of fair ADR and lack of landowner authority that I believe are in the WS bundles by @aphex007 and @SJRRJS.

You know that rejection letter you never got...what are the 3 middle numbers in that POPLA code before the 9 (for 2019)? 

I'm not sure, there are two 9's is it OK to write the full ref number here? 

Coupon-mad

Yes because it's an old POPLA code.