We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
The Forum is currently experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
EV Discussion thread
Comments
-
1961Nick said:JKenH said:michaels said:JKenH said:Grumpy_chap said:MeteredOut said:Surely you can get quotes with wha you know your NCB will be? Or, do you not know? It should be last years renewal quote + 1 yearMagnitio said:
It should be included as part of the documentation provided with the renewal quote.
I don't know what it was last year so can't simply +1
It is not stated in the renewal documents.
I have asked the current insurer to confirm. I have asked several times. They are making me grumpy
Also making me grumpy is the TM3 did a software update over the weekend and it is very temperamental for it.
There is a new feature to activate auto-steer at the same time as cruise control. I disabled that as it can often be useful to have cruise control but not autosteer.
The lane-keeping assistant has become very aggressive, so much so that I was over-riding it so much in the first two miles it self-disabled for the remainder of the journey. Maybe it is a calibration process after the update?
I also found the autosteer when used was requiring far more "wobbles" of the steering wheel. Maybe another post-update calibration.
One very annoying thing - I don't know whether it is the update - but the car slowed be down (to 65 and then to 60) for periods on the motorway with the message "Speed Restricted - poor road conditions". I hope this can be disabled.
My update does not appear to have included the "dogging" game - perhaps that only activates in Lincolnshire. I won't be going near there anytime to find out.
While some may approve of such intervention, the fact that it is first appearing widely in EVs means inevitably that EVs will be regarded as the thin end of the wedge for those who want to keep control of our cars.
Many if not all EVs are capable of over the air “upgrades” so I can imagine these safety improvements will be coming thick and fast whether we want them or not. If we refuse the latest update will our cars be disabled or our insurance rendered invalid?
How long before cars are hacked and taken over by rogue actors and you find yourself hurtling down the road out of control? Is that really so far fetched?
You can be stuck behind a vehicle going very slowly on twisty bits of road that then on a straighter bit of road accelerates up to a few mph below the speed limit meaning you would be stuck behind it indefinitely as you could only pass it effectively at walking pace. Overtaking long slow moving vehicles (like a tractor towing a trailer) becomes problematic because the manoeuvre takes so much longer that there is more opportunity for another car to appear coming from the opposite direction. Without the ability to accelerate out of trouble and complete the manoeuvre the potential exists to create more accidents.I am not against speed limits per se but removing the ability to exceed them on occasion can be just as dangerous.No tech is foolproof and the way speed assist systems work can easily lead to situations where the incorrect speed limit is set. GPS maps may be out of date, road signs obscured, on board camera lenses obscured etc. Many Tesla owners frequently find autopilot is disabled in certain visibility related situations so will intelligent speed assist (ISA) systems work any better? The more we get used to relying on them the less responsibility we take as drivers and the more potential for accidents.
While I might use adaptive cruise (ACC) on motorways, there are situations when I turn it off because I feel I can do a better job manually of adjusting my speed up or down for smoother driving. A typical case in point is when sitting in the middle lane overtaking a line of lorries on a hill with ACC set at 70 and a slower vehicle in front travelling at say 60. The vehicle in front having passed the lorries moves to the near side lane. Your car on ACC accelerates back up to the speed limit just as the car, now on the inside lane realises he should have stayed in the middle lane and pulls back out again. Braking ensues. A driver can anticipate these situations but a computer doesn’t and your car is accelerating towards a potential crash.
ISA is generally a good thing, as is ACC used correctly but in certain situations can be more hindrance than help, particularly where the flexibility to override is removed.What I would ask, though, is if cars are going to have ISA built in then what is the point of having more than say 150bhp or 300Nm of torque in any car? It doesn’t serve any purpose than in a traffic light Grand Prix. My neighbours son managed to stuff his Aston Martin into a hedge within 100 yards of setting off because the car had far more power and torque than he could handle. If you are going to have ISA then also limit all cars to, say, 80mph top speed and 0-60 in 10 seconds.I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.0 -
michaels said:Always use the speed limiter when I get in a 20 zone as it s just so easy to go over - but I do set at about 23 based on the speedo over-read and sneaking an extra 1mph...
Speaking of speedo over-read our mark 1 leaf shows 70mph when the actual speed (on the phone) is about 63 and similar at other speeds so a built in speed limiter would mean driving every where at 10% below the actual limit.
Finding in the many Welsh 20mph zones, that the flow of traffic is around 22-23mph (real), I tend to set the Tesla to 22mph.Mart. Cardiff. 8.72 kWp PV systems (2.12 SSW 4.6 ESE & 2.0 WNW). 20kWh battery storage. Two A2A units for cleaner heating. Two BEV's for cleaner driving.
For general PV advice please see the PV FAQ thread on the Green & Ethical Board.1 -
The leaf 40 is much more realistic - perhaps 1-2% over so we need to adjust depending which one we are driving...I think....0
-
The problem I find is that it is difficult to identify the 20mph zones as they change to 30 so frequently and a lot of signs have been graffitied so the Tesla isn’t picking them up.I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.0
-
silvercar said:The problem I find is that it is difficult to identify the 20mph zones as they change to 30 so frequently and a lot of signs have been graffitied so the Tesla isn’t picking them up.
I'm hoping that a bit of exposure to UV light will modify the opacity/reflectivity of the overlays, in time. Unfortunately there hasn't been any sunshine, to speak of, since September, so it's going to be a long wait.0 -
JKenH said:1961Nick said:JKenH said:michaels said:JKenH said:Grumpy_chap said:MeteredOut said:Surely you can get quotes with wha you know your NCB will be? Or, do you not know? It should be last years renewal quote + 1 yearMagnitio said:
It should be included as part of the documentation provided with the renewal quote.
I don't know what it was last year so can't simply +1
It is not stated in the renewal documents.
I have asked the current insurer to confirm. I have asked several times. They are making me grumpy
Also making me grumpy is the TM3 did a software update over the weekend and it is very temperamental for it.
There is a new feature to activate auto-steer at the same time as cruise control. I disabled that as it can often be useful to have cruise control but not autosteer.
The lane-keeping assistant has become very aggressive, so much so that I was over-riding it so much in the first two miles it self-disabled for the remainder of the journey. Maybe it is a calibration process after the update?
I also found the autosteer when used was requiring far more "wobbles" of the steering wheel. Maybe another post-update calibration.
One very annoying thing - I don't know whether it is the update - but the car slowed be down (to 65 and then to 60) for periods on the motorway with the message "Speed Restricted - poor road conditions". I hope this can be disabled.
My update does not appear to have included the "dogging" game - perhaps that only activates in Lincolnshire. I won't be going near there anytime to find out.
While some may approve of such intervention, the fact that it is first appearing widely in EVs means inevitably that EVs will be regarded as the thin end of the wedge for those who want to keep control of our cars.
Many if not all EVs are capable of over the air “upgrades” so I can imagine these safety improvements will be coming thick and fast whether we want them or not. If we refuse the latest update will our cars be disabled or our insurance rendered invalid?
How long before cars are hacked and taken over by rogue actors and you find yourself hurtling down the road out of control? Is that really so far fetched?
You can be stuck behind a vehicle going very slowly on twisty bits of road that then on a straighter bit of road accelerates up to a few mph below the speed limit meaning you would be stuck behind it indefinitely as you could only pass it effectively at walking pace. Overtaking long slow moving vehicles (like a tractor towing a trailer) becomes problematic because the manoeuvre takes so much longer that there is more opportunity for another car to appear coming from the opposite direction. Without the ability to accelerate out of trouble and complete the manoeuvre the potential exists to create more accidents.I am not against speed limits per se but removing the ability to exceed them on occasion can be just as dangerous.No tech is foolproof and the way speed assist systems work can easily lead to situations where the incorrect speed limit is set. GPS maps may be out of date, road signs obscured, on board camera lenses obscured etc. Many Tesla owners frequently find autopilot is disabled in certain visibility related situations so will intelligent speed assist (ISA) systems work any better? The more we get used to relying on them the less responsibility we take as drivers and the more potential for accidents.
While I might use adaptive cruise (ACC) on motorways, there are situations when I turn it off because I feel I can do a better job manually of adjusting my speed up or down for smoother driving. A typical case in point is when sitting in the middle lane overtaking a line of lorries on a hill with ACC set at 70 and a slower vehicle in front travelling at say 60. The vehicle in front having passed the lorries moves to the near side lane. Your car on ACC accelerates back up to the speed limit just as the car, now on the inside lane realises he should have stayed in the middle lane and pulls back out again. Braking ensues. A driver can anticipate these situations but a computer doesn’t and your car is accelerating towards a potential crash.
ISA is generally a good thing, as is ACC used correctly but in certain situations can be more hindrance than help, particularly where the flexibility to override is removed.What I would ask, though, is if cars are going to have ISA built in then what is the point of having more than say 150bhp or 300Nm of torque in any car? It doesn’t serve any purpose than in a traffic light Grand Prix. My neighbours son managed to stuff his Aston Martin into a hedge within 100 yards of setting off because the car had far more power and torque than he could handle. If you are going to have ISA then also limit all cars to, say, 80mph top speed and 0-60 in 10 seconds.
The best setting is the standard Tesla 'Sport' mode as it barely ever breaks traction or ever deploys anything other than all 525bhp. How it manages that is a mystery to me as all the ICE cars I've had with over 300bhp & awd have struggled in slippery conditions - all running on Michelin PS4S tyres so it's definitely the car.
4kWp (black/black) - Sofar Inverter - SSE(141°) - 30° pitch - North LincsInstalled June 2013 - PVGIS = 3400Sofar ME3000SP Inverter & 5 x Pylontech US2000B Plus & 3 x US2000C Batteries - 19.2kWh0 -
Grumpy_chap said:MeteredOut said:Surely you can get quotes with wha you know your NCB will be? Or, do you not know? It should be last years renewal quote + 1 yearMagnitio said:
It should be included as part of the documentation provided with the renewal quote.
I don't know what it was last year so can't simply +1
It is not stated in the renewal documents.
I have asked the current insurer to confirm. I have asked several times. They are making me grumpy
I want to confirm that I am answering the questions correctly while shopping around and the Tesla Manual does not specifically give the information.
1. Is it a Factory Fitted Thatcham Approved Alarm and Immobiliser?
2. Is a Tracker device fitted? Does the app being able to say where the car is count, or does that mean a specific Tracker device?
It is annoying that the online comparison sites do not detect my car from the registration plate. You would think after 6 months that would have populated.
EDIT: I have sent an e-mail to Tesla to ask them to confirm the alarm accreditation.0 -
Tesla have sent information on the alarm accreditation - they quote a standard which I cannot guarantee is the same as "Thatcham approved".
I think I will ask in the Insurance Board as, hopefully, there will be someone there that can confirm either way.0 -
If in doubt I just say no. Might increase premium by a couple of quid but better than a denied claim.
4.7kwp PV split equally N and S 20° 2016.Givenergy AIO (2024)Seat Mii electric (2021). MG4 Trophy (2024).1.2kw Ripple Kirk Hill. 0.6kw Derril Water.Whitelaw Bay 0.2kwVaillant aroTHERM plus 5kW ASHP (2025)Gas supply capped (2025)0 -
Fortunately, DGG gave a full and complete answer, with evidence, to my query in the insurance board
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/80481594#Comment_80481594
1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.3K Spending & Discounts
- 243.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.7K Life & Family
- 256.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards