2 seperate private parking invoices.

Coupon-mad

Your choice. 

Keying error = £20 settlement per PCN.  If that seems worth it, we won't stop you.

Lack of NTH documents, in a case where POPLA is an option and no-one has implied who the driver was at any point = a likely win and pay nothing at all.

Horus_lupercal

Makes sense to me. Would emails to the landowners using phrases like 'my reg' be able to imply the driver? Or is correspondence to them not relevant to the appeal?

KeithP

Horus_lupercal said:

Makes sense to me. Would emails to the landowners using phrases like 'my reg' be able to imply the driver?

No. All that implies is that 'the reg' belongs to the writer.
Of course who owns 'the reg' doesn't have to be driving at the time of the event.

Coupon-mad

Emails to the landowner are not in evidence to POPLA anyway, unless they shared the complaint with the PPC.  Even then, it IS your reg. 

Horus_lupercal

That's what I was thinking. Thanks. Anything send to the companies will not imply who's driving. I will of course run my drafts through here before sending.

Horus_lupercal

So I've had another nth letter at my new address, with the same details on. My question is, do I start the timer from the date of the first, or second letter? Or is it started from the date the hire company sent them my details?

Coupon-mad

There is no 3 week timer with a postal notice.

Horus_lupercal

Oh, so when do I put in the appeal? I feel like I read on one of the other forum threads that you should wait a certain period so as to not allow them to send the extra documents later, 3 weeks from them being sent from the hire company?

'creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer.

(2)The conditions are that—

(a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper

(b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed; and

(3)In sub-paragraph (2)(a) “the relevant period” is the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the documents required by paragraph 13(2) are given to the creditor.'

This is what I'm curious about.

Horus_lupercal

So the first parking charge has been cancelled after contacting the landowner. Result! I honestly hadn't put much faith in this option but it's worked. One more to go.

Horus_lupercal

So the landowner for the second notice has completely rodded me off, so it looks like I'm appealing this one. It's been 22 days since the hire company provided parkingeye with my details. I have received a notice to my new address, but it's not labelled notice to hirer and contains none of the necessary additional documents, aswell as being a 'golden ticket.' 

My question now is, do I just do a bog standard appeal to them now then hit them with the big gun pofa stuff at popla, or go all out on the initial appeal and hope they take the L? PE seem to be notorious for rejecting appeals?