We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Count Court appearance soon

2456710

Comments

  • KeithP
    KeithP Posts: 41,296 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Greenhaze said:
    Do I have to also email all of my exhibits to the (C) solicitor in my bundle?



    3) Can I email my bundle or does it have to be printed and handed to the claimant and the court?

    Email is fine and probably better. Email to both court and legal reps. 


    Yes. Everything you intend to rely on. Including of course your Summary Costs Assessment.
  • Just realised since I already have the (C) WS can I refute aspect of it in my WS or only in my Skeleton? 
  • Redx
    Redx Posts: 38,084 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I think that @bargepole has explained what should be in a WS and the possible uses of a skeleton

    Afaik a skeleton is a bullet point aide memoire to narrow the issues , not somewhere to wax lyrical with new arguments etc , many people don't bother with one , relying on the defence and WS plus summary costs assessment ( but maybe have a short bullet point list to hand to remind yourself of the main issues )

    Frankly , I was surprised to see questions about a skeleton , not seen any for a very long time on here
  • The reason I mentioned the Skelton argument Is because it's mentioned on a few times on threads about the purpose of it for court as it helps the judge see the key facts without getting to bogged down in the WS. But may be the skeleton not so essential for county court. 
  • Redx
    Redx Posts: 38,084 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 29 January 2022 at 2:45AM
    Greenhaze said:
    The reason I mentioned the Skelton argument Is because it's mentioned on a few times on threads about the purpose of it for court as it helps the judge see the key facts without getting to bogged down in the WS. But may be the skeleton not so essential for county court. 
    Yes , sounds correct , so doesn't contain any extra arguments or transcripts etc , just a concise set of points that repeat what is already in the defence and WS , not in addition to , but a short concise précis of the main issues , the details of which can be found in the defence plus WS plus Exhibits

    It's not essential at all , but can help
  • 95Rollers
    95Rollers Posts: 820 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 500 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Had a read of their WS which seems like a copy and paste of many others I've seen.

    Off the top of my head - things I would challenge are:

    1) Double Recovery - they say that "additional costs" are added. This is a bounty they keep if they collect the money for the parking firm who they give the original value.  The matter is at the Claim stage so why are they taking an extra £60/70 claim - the debt collectors failed to collect so why is their add-on "admin/debt collection" fee being claimed?!?  They failed and had a "No Win/ No Fee" agreement with the Parking Firms where the parking firm would get £100 and they'd keep their £60 admin fee. So i'd challenge that along with the usual examples of double recovery/ abuse of process - Excel vs Wilkinson and lots of other judgments where cases have been struck out on this basis:

    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6103933/abuse-of-process-thread-part-2

    A selection of Judgment forms:

    https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https://us.v-cdn.net/6031891/uploads/editor/23/ywcts4vrjm85.pdf&psig=AOvVaw0rtUh2jNC0LJvyqL4VUfYe&ust=1643503302185000&source=images&cd=vfe&ved=0CAkQjhxqFwoTCOCO0Ibd1fUCFQAAAAAdAAAAABAk

    Plus the Beavis case is worth drawing a comparison against - they all quote Beavis case, but this and most parking charge scenarios are completely different to that unique set of circumstances.

    2) It mentions their signs. There is no photographs so we cannot assist with this.  BUT I'd suggest maybe getting onto Google Street View and going back to the date of parking event and evidence that signs were not viewable nor readable from a vehicle when entering.  Have a look at IPC's CoP for that date section on sign regulations and then see if the signs there met the CoP criteria for a carpark of that ilk. Was it night? Were they illuminated or clean? etc etc. You obviously missed them for a reason so explain that you couldn't see them - were vehicles blocking your view? etc etc.  Include pictures of your route and PoV from that time so the judge can see what you saw (or didn't in this case).

    I'm sure there is other stuff. But I'm tired and cannot think anymore.  
  • Le_Kirk
    Le_Kirk Posts: 25,096 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    The second (huge) link does not work, it wants to redirect to another page!
  • Coupon-mad
    Coupon-mad Posts: 155,731 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Greenhaze said:
    Just realised since I already have the (C) WS can I refute aspect of it in my WS or only in my Skeleton? 
    Yes.  That's a really old and tired WS template they've used.  Search the forum for WS rebuttals over the years, of Alder v Moore!

    Whether you do a skelly or not (one or 2 pages of bullet point law, max!) make sure you use as an authority, Jopson v Homeguard and also ParkingEye v Somerfield paras 418-429, given they've quoted from the latter, yet ignored the fact it shows an exaggerated 'admin fee' can't be added!

    Also look at the duration between photos - 3 minutes?

    Argument re IPC CoP: No grace period to unload/escort a passenger indoors (can't recall which you said but it was a situation supported by Jopson).

    You are reading lots of threads like yours we assume?  We read every single one daily, including:

     https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6325567/ws-stage-quick-question#latest

    Exactly like your case!

    Pm them for info about what they put and what the Judge said, and even things like their claim number and name of Judge/court, to quote.  Not a precedent but close to your case arguments and likely to help you focus.






    PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
    CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
    Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD
  • Thank you coupon mad, I read the paragraphs 418 -429 of PE vs Somerfield, which is also echoed by DDJ Jackson in Excel v Wikinson case.

    Since (C) has brought up somerfield would be wise to comment on that case since they brought it up but failed to mention the relevant facts of that case or just use the Wilkinson case since I've already made reference to it in my WS?

    Also can I mention other case law in my WS that wasn't in my Defence as long as fits the relevant argument? 

    Lastly how to work out cost is there any examples on here as I've wasted months reading in preparation for CC instead of spending time with kids? 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.