DCB Legal & UKPC - Remnant PCN

IndigoMondayToyota

Thanks Unkomaas.

Funnily enough I was just going through that after reading through someone else’s who had a court date early October.

I do hope it ends up that way, as it did with my last case - but we shall see!

And that’s right Patient Dream - April next year! I did have pre-existing holiday I notified the court, but that only lasted up until end of October…so who knows why it got pushed all the way till then!

Thanks,
IMT

Coupon-mad

Recent WS bundle examples that supersede the one linked in the NEWBIES thread are by:

@Daiapolon2021

or

@aphex007

IndigoMondayToyota

Thanks CM - I’ll be taking those WS bundle examples into account when I have my first draft.

Thank you,
IMT

IndigoMondayToyota

Good evening all,

I have created my first draft of my WS and Evidence Bundle - do let me know what you think I should add / edit / remove:

***REDACTED OLD VERSION***

-- Defendants Schedule of Costs - I need a bit of assistance with this! If i claim for further costs / stationary, etc. am I required to provide evidence like receipts, and also employment contract, etc. if I'm attending court?

-- I have the following other evidences and unsure if / where to provide / link to in my WS:

• Land Registry Plan (when I paid for it 2016)
• 2 x Email Complaints to Housing Association as it was blurred who's responsibility it fell under (FYI - I was living with my parents, ergo not on any documentation to say I was a resident, so only my parent's names were on the above)
• Email to my (then) MP - no response, even after a chaser)
• Email correspondences around the "claim is estopped under cause of action estoppel" from my previous alleged infringements (PCN's into the double digits rolled into one claim... that was discontinued)
• Copies of my DQ to UKPC & DCBLegal but with proof of postage, and emails to CCBCAQ stating "due to staffing levels we are working on DQ received from XXXXX" (in-case they claim I didn't send it on time)
  

-- For each paragraph pertaining WS & Evidences, I have jotted some notes down I'd like to get steer on:

#2 & #3 - Statement taken from my previous WS case - not sure if still relevant, so can remove if needed.

#5 - I only have the old photos of the signages (x2) - recent GoogleMaps images from 2022 show it's now been removed - I was thinking to remove if not necessary?

#6 - UKPC SAR shows no road markings where I parked, and so does Google Street View - is it worth mentioning in my WS? Also, I think this conflicts with the signage saying, "All vehicles must be parked only within marked bays"... Should i still keep this?

#7 - also links to #6 - I can obtain two Exhibit versions from GoogleMaps Street View (one without Road Markings - dated 1 year before infringement, or 2 years after infringement which does) - which should I use?

#8 - Signage states how payment can be made, but technically no way of proving this permit by displaying on vehicle as stated on sign (nor a way to determine if it'll update "parking enforcers" machine / system in time).

- Should I use my own image of the signage, or UKPC SAR?
- FYI the 4 x SAR images show car parked with illegible signage in distance - should i use these?

#11 - Links to #6 but can't recall what time I parked there that morning...Also, I have the copy of the PCN from the SAR - can I use as evidence?

#12 - Exihibit is copy provided from SAR

#13 - Exihibit is copy provided from SAR

#14 - I've kept the original letters so I can scan and provide these if needed. Final letter isn't from Debt Recovery Company but from DCBLegal...

#15, #16, #18, #19, #21, #41 - Exhibits obtained online

Hopefully I've captured all my notes, but happy to get as much feedback on this as possible!

Thank you,

IMT

IndigoMondayToyota

Hi,

Just wanted to bump this up as I’m due to go into the office either tomorrow and Thurs or Thurs/Fri so would like to make use of the printing / scanning facilities at work! Then, I’m away next week - just conscious if the submission 14 days before the deadline (Sept 28th 4pm) applies for this?

Thanks in advance,
IMT

1505grandad

Some observations:-

2.

It is admitted that I was the registered keeper of this vehicle with the registration mark XXXXXXX on

DD / MM / YYYY, however it is denied that a ‘parking charge notice’ was issued to the vehicle on the date specified, not least because this was XXX years ago and no credible photographic evidence has been supplied of a PCN on the car on all / any day the Claimant suggests a parking charge arose.

11.

A few minutes later at DD / MM / YYYY HH:MM:SS , a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) was left on the vehicle

asking for a payment of £100. The PCN stated the fee would have been reduced to £60 if paid within 14 days from receiving the notice (Exhibit CC06– provided by UKPC from the SAR)

Does para 11 contradict para 2?

Para 18  -  is the exhibit number stated correct?

IndigoMondayToyota

Thanks @1505grandad.

Yes - you’re correct. That does in fact contradict it! I’ll revise para 2 to remove that part and everything after (serves me right for copying that from my previous WS 6 years ago..)

And para 18 - thank you! Good spot - I’ll amend accordingly.

I welcome other feedback please on this.

Thanks in advance,
IMT

Coupon-mad

Show us the newest draft with all the changes made.

IndigoMondayToyota

Hi CM,

Newest draft is here:

***REDACTED OLD VERSION***

Thanks,

IMT

IndigoMondayToyota

Hi,

DCBLegal have attempted to contact me via phone, fortunately it went to voicemail as I was at work, but they just said to call them back to discuss my case.

Should I ignore this and presume they just want me to pay / sort out before the court hearing?

Thanks,
IMT