Autosec and DCBL Letter of Claim

Fruitcake

Jenni_D said:

Rodent3768 said:

I've gone back with a response of asking for a copy of the redacted contract and plan which I don't expect to receive, a reminder that their client hasn't provided any response to the SAR and has been instructed by the ICO to provide it, therefore no evidence, and a request for a breakdown of the alluded deluded debt.

Fixed that for you. 😉😁

Please don't post things like that when I an drinking beer. 

1 It makes a mess of the keyboard when I spit it out.
2 It is a waste of beer, which is alcohol abuse.

95Rollers

patient_dream said:

Rodent3768 said:

 "We have reviewed the evidence you have provided with our Client. We can confirm that our Client had the necessary authority to issue and enforce PCNs on the land. The PCN was therefore issued correctly and the balance of £170 remains outstanding and due."

Given what you say, can they really .... it uas Autosec after all

If they seriously think the ticket was correctly issued  then why are they faking £170 ?? .... there is no legal authoriy for the fake £70 because the BPA code of practice is NOT a legal authority.
It's designed so everyone can get a share of the action

DCBL will have to explain to a judge why they are attempting to fool the court with Double Recovery

That may well explain why DCBL bottle it at the last minute with so many cases 🤔 

Fruitcake

Rodent3768 said:

Got a lovely response today

Dear Mr Rodent, 

Thank you for your email.

Please note that the outstanding balance consists of the £100 parking charge notice (PCN) with an additional £70 for the debt recovery fee. The sum added is a contribution to the actual costs incurred by our Client as a result of your non-payment. Our Client's employees have spent time and material attempting to recover the debt. This is not our Client's usual business and the resources could have been better spent in other areas of the business. Had you of paid as per the Contract, there would have been no need for recovery action so the amount due would not have increased.

Yours faithfully,

Mr Rodent

Facts not in evidence, m'lud. No contract has been produced.

Definitely ask what "of paid" means, as it is not part of the English language.

95Rollers

Our Client's employees have spent time and material attempting to recover the debt. This is not our Client's usual business and the resources could have been better spent in other areas of the business.

That is a stock reply they put on all their Correspondence in an attempt to justify these bombastic inflated fantasy costs!!!  Although dealing with this spurious tosh has certainly detracted you away from your work - it has with me. I've had to book a day off work for court, spent hours researching and investigating then had to turn down 2 days of overtime on my days off to write up and build my WS! Again hours spent prepping and investigating hindered on family time and stopped me doing community work as my time is limited so its not just me who has lost out due to PPC's Greed!!!  Its worth mentioning this in your WS. But I digress...

Of course its their usual business!!! If not then why do they pressurise and bully their attendants for PCN targets, why do they chase people who've clearly paid/ got permits for years just to get a second bite of cherry they've already been paid for or why do they advertise Perecentage cuts or £10 cashback per PCN to  landowners ehey want business off or burn yearlong loyal customers for the sake of a higher fee on a single PCN?!? Cut the crap Sarah Jane!!!

Thus argument holds no weight because he has done Sweet FA to furnish you with even the basics of the allegation or a shred of basic "evidence".  He and DCBL want to take you for what you've got- but are far too lazy,  greedy and arrogant to provide thr basics. Good luck getting that past a judge!!! 

Her job is based on begging and threatening and begging for parking ticket revenue so nobody is being taken away from their "usual nature of business" which I'd ask her to clarify- maybe this has detracted DG away from his Racist endeavours and threats of rape or misogyny?!?

Le_Kirk

Had you of paid as per the Contract,

Did they really put that or have you paraphrased?

D_P_Dance

Coupon-mad said:

Don't copy in the SRA to basic stuff where the legal firm has not breached the standards set by the SRA.  Waste of time.

I disagree flood them with complaints.  Whilst the SRA may not be responsible for the clients claims,  they have a duty to ensure that they are not fraudulent.  Their primary  responsibility is to the court, not the client.  

Be sure to see that that letter is senn by the judge.

Umkomaas

Our Client's employees have spent time and material attempting to recover the debt. This is not our Client's usual business and the resources could have been better spent in other areas of the business.

They're regurgitating the line that Gove and his minions seem to be ready to swallow!

Rodent3768

@Le_Kirk that's a direct copy from their email.

Voyeurmse

Rodent3768 said:

Got a lovely response today

Dear Mr Rodent, 

Thank you for your email.

Please note that the outstanding balance consists of the £100 parking charge notice (PCN) with an additional £70 for the debt recovery fee. The sum added is a contribution to the actual costs incurred by our Client as a result of your non-payment. Our Client's employees have spent time and material attempting to recover the debt. This is not our Client's usual business and the resources could have been better spent in other areas of the business. Had you of paid as per the Contract, there would have been no need for recovery action so the amount due would not have increased.

In terms of the authority provided to our Client to issue and enforce PCNs on the Land, we refer to section 2 of the Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims. The aim of pre-action correspondence is to: -

a.            encourage early engagement and communication between the parties, including early exchange of sufficient information about the matter to help clarify whether there are any issues in dispute; 

b.            enable the parties to resolve the matter without the need to start court proceedings, including agreeing a reasonable repayment plan or considering using an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) procedure; 

c.             encourage the parties to act in a reasonable and proportionate manner in all dealings with one another (for example, avoiding running up costs which do not bear a reasonable relationship to the sums in issue); and 

d.            support the efficient management of proceedings that cannot be avoided. 

At this stage, we do not think the nature of your correspondence is conducive to the above and as such, a County Court claim will be issued without further notice unless payment is received within 30 days from the date of my previous email on 29/11/2021.

Payment can be made via bank transfer to our designated client account:-

Account Name: DCB Legal Ltd Client Account 

Sort Code: 20-24-09 

Account Number: 60964441

You must quote the correct case reference (beginning '10') when making payment. If you do not, we may be unable to correctly allocate the payment. If further action is taken by us as a result of an incorrect reference being quoted, you will be liable for any further fees or costs incurred.            

Alternatively, you can contact DCB Legal Ltd on 0203 434 0424 to make payment over the telephone. 

Kind Regards, 

 
Sarah-Jane Thompson-Mayers 
Paralegal 
DCB Legal Limited 

I'm a little offended by their comments about me not undergoing conducive correspondence so I have replied:

Sarah Jane,

I don't understand what the authority of your client to issue tickets has to do with the Pre Action Protocol, other than if they provide evidence it will clarify one of the issues! Once I see evidence I will be able to open a dialog for agreeing a way forward.
I have made many attempts to communicate reasonably with your client.
a.    I followed the instruction to appeal but never received a response.
b.    I have asked for copies of all correspondence, images and recordings between myself and your client and their agents but have not received anything.
c.    I have provided information that your client does not have authority to issue tickets in that area yet your client has not provided evidence to the contrary.
Therefore I maintain that I am fully complying with the Pre-Action Protocol. Your client could have avoided all of the unnecessary expense they suggest they have incurred by responding to my earlier communications and I again invite them to cease their action.
Yours faithfully,

Mr Rodent

See Companies House Autosec details.  It is clearly stated,  they have no employees therefore they have lied.  Your proof is there.

‘Had you of paid as per the contract...’ Good god!  That’s hilarious.  

I had one of those 30 days letters months ago, after a LOC I’m still waiting.  

95Rollers

Voyeurmse said:

See Companies House Autosec details.  It is clearly stated,  they have no employees therefore they have lied.  Your proof is there.

‘Had you of paid as per the contract...’ Good god!  That’s hilarious.  

I had one of those 30 days letters months ago, after a LOC I’m still waiting.  

Brainless Bullies vs Educated Decent People. 🍿  must go to the shop as I need way more popcorn!