We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
I am being billed £328 for 2 months by e-On after moving to a new property
Comments
-
As much as I dont want it to seem like I am going back and forth and arguing with you, as you have been extremely helpfulTokmon said:
But what else would you expect them to do?
They have sent you a bill clearly showing the readings are estimated and exactly what you have been charged for. If your just going to ignore the bill and not even look at it then your just as likely to ignore any letters or emails they sent as well.
It's common sense you should read any bills you are sent and if you can't be bothered to do that then that's your fault as the information has been supplied to you.
I respectfully disagree, neither has this got to anything to do with common sense.
When I first got my bill from e-On, I called them up to complain and went back and forth for a repeatedly, from the start I offered meter readings which they declined, saying they can only accept from my new supplier BULB, hence I chased up BULB, repeatedly to no avail, I submitted readings to BULB
All I got from e-On (as I have repeatedly said) was threats of a ccj and destroy my credit history
It was you guys who correctly advised me. Then to my greatest surprise e-On turned around and accepted my meter reading (which they had earlier repeatedly refused) and then corrected their bill LATER DOWN THE LINE
Again its pointless going back and forth, as I have said, I have found your advise on here extremely helpful0 -
Not quite. I know that you have a thing about this but all industry-validated switch (opening and closing) readings tend to be annotated with the letter ‘E’. The key point is whether we like or not all companies have the right in Law to correct bills. That’s life.Reed_Richards said:
Yes, I mean exactly like that but obligatory on all such final statements.Dolor said:Do you mean like this: (snapshot from a 2017 bill on switch)
0 -
I have no problem with that. It's just that I want final to mean final.[Deleted User] said: The key point is whether we like or not all companies have the right in Law to correct bills. That’s life.Reed0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
