We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Vendor is insistent on visiting after completion
Options
Comments
-
For those saying write RTS on the envelope, this will only work if there is a return address written or printed on the outside of the envelope. The days of the Post Office/Royal Mail opening letters to find out where they had come from to return it to them are long gone. If it's blank, RM will bin it.
Make £2025 in 2025
Prolific £229.82, Octopoints £4.27, Topcashback £290.85, Tesco Clubcard challenges £60, Misc Sales £321, Airtime £10.
Total £915.94/£2025 45.2%
Make £2024 in 2024
Prolific £907.37, Chase Intt £59.97, Chase roundup int £3.55, Chase CB £122.88, Roadkill £1.30, Octopus referral reward £50, Octopoints £70.46, Topcashback £112.03, Shopmium referral £3, Iceland bonus £4, Ipsos survey £20, Misc Sales £55.44Total £1410/£2024 70%Make £2023 in 2023 Total: £2606.33/£2023 128.8%0 -
lookstraightahead said:kdotdotdotdot said:This sounds like a tale of culture clash. Some people are very 'my home is my castle and no one uninvited is allowed to tread on MY ground' while others are more of the 'hail-fellow-well-met' type with a front door that's always open to everyone and anyone.
The vendor is an older man, who's probably been very happy in that house and part of the local community for some time. It's only been since April that he's moved away, so no wonder he's having a hard time letting go. I'm surprised at all the posters who imagine that it's easy to let go of long friendships in just a matter of months, and just move on in life.
It's not really that irksome to have someone popping round to pick up post, and if it is, just tell him so. The decent thing to do is return to sender his post, and it's really not that difficult. You don't have to do it immediately if you're busy and he'll soon get the message.
I do see the op's side and there is a cut off point, but the man might be going through all kinds of things.Op aside, we seem to have this unhealthy attachment to our castles.
If you've paid hundreds of thousands for your castle I'd call it a healthy attachment.
0 -
Slinky said:For those saying write RTS on the envelope, this will only work if there is a return address written or printed on the outside of the envelope. The days of the Post Office/Royal Mail opening letters to find out where they had come from to return it to them are long gone. If it's blank, RM will bin it.
I had one returned to me via the RM Belfast office. Instead of using the return address (including my surname) I had written on the back of the envelope they sent it to Belfast where they opened the letter which was personal and returned it to me (using my first name not surname as that was not on the letter) with a note which said I should have put return details on the envelope!0 -
I'd not be happy with this situation at all. Bin the mail, stop answering the phone by blocking the number and ignore the visits.
0 -
I'm not sure what is legally correct or incorrect in these circumstances and it seems that many others are not sure either but after 11 pages what is clear is that there are some who consider even a minor inconvenience to help others such a significant burden that they should not and will not extend a courtesy of giving a little.
It's endemic behaviour; manners and courtesy towards others seem to be of a bygone era, on the roads, in shops, travelling on public transport, in all aspects of daily interaction, selfishness takes over.
How do we get to the stage where we are so far detached from other people and are unwilling to tolerate and give a little time and empathy for others?5 -
The_Real_Cheddar_Bob said:I'd not be happy with this situation at all. Bin the mail, stop answering the phone by blocking the number and ignore the visits.0
-
BikingBud said:I'm not sure what is legally correct or incorrect in these circumstances and it seems that many others are not sure either but after 11 pages what is clear is that there are some who consider even a minor inconvenience to help others such a significant burden that they should not and will not extend a courtesy of giving a little.
It's endemic behaviour; manners and courtesy towards others seem to be of a bygone era, on the roads, in shops, travelling on public transport, in all aspects of daily interaction, selfishness takes over.
How do we get to the stage where we are so far detached from other people and are unwilling to tolerate and give a little time and empathy for others?14 -
BikingBud said:I'm not sure what is legally correct or incorrect in these circumstances and it seems that many others are not sure either but after 11 pages what is clear is that there are some who consider even a minor inconvenience to help others such a significant burden that they should not and will not extend a courtesy of giving a little.
It's endemic behaviour; manners and courtesy towards others seem to be of a bygone era, on the roads, in shops, travelling on public transport, in all aspects of daily interaction, selfishness takes over.
How do we get to the stage where we are so far detached from other people and are unwilling to tolerate and give a little time and empathy for others?
I'd say that the continued intrusion of a stranger is not a minor inconvenience.
12 -
BikingBud said:I'm not sure what is legally correct or incorrect in these circumstances and it seems that many others are not sure either but after 11 pages what is clear is that there are some who consider even a minor inconvenience to help others such a significant burden that they should not and will not extend a courtesy of giving a little.
It's endemic behaviour; manners and courtesy towards others seem to be of a bygone era, on the roads, in shops, travelling on public transport, in all aspects of daily interaction, selfishness takes over.
How do we get to the stage where we are so far detached from other people and are unwilling to tolerate and give a little time and empathy for others?
He has a sense of entitlement that the OP shouldn't have to pander to. Why should the OP go out of their way to help him when he's too lazy to sort his own affairs and is rude to others who he expects to sort his post for him.
Redirection is a very basic thing to do. While it's not perfect and the odd letter can slip through, the op can pop it back in the post box when it suits them to do so. The previous home owner isn't entitled to expect the OP to be home when it suits him to give him his post.6 -
It's entitlement. Possibly the gent has moved to a larger place, or see the op as inferior to him in some way. Regardless, id cut this crap out now.2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards