We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Octopus Tracker
Options
Comments
-
SAC2334 said:Spoonie_Turtle said:SAC2334 said:masonic said:Telegraph_Sam said:I was trying to work out from the Tracker FAQ's when the new charges come into effect if I am on Nov 22 v1 without an end date. Has this date been publicized?
It might make a bit more sense if you view them as different tariffs, just all of a certain type. Kind of like how fixes are offered, then closed to new customers. Obviously not quite the same as that's based on buying set amounts of energy, but it means people are on tariffs with a similar name but different versions and pricing all at the same time, and if you're too late for a cheaper one that's not inherently unfair. Similarly if you've joined a Tracker tariff too late to benefit from the cheaper, earlier version, that's just the way it is.1 -
I have read this para 3.16 through several times. My interpretation for what it's worth is that if I made an active choice to move to Tracker [Nov 22 v1] then I am not protected by the price cap regardless of whether there is an end date or not. It refers to SC's only by the look of it. There may be another para that clarifies how the date of joining the tariff affects the situation.Telegraph Sam
There are also unknown unknowns - the one's we don't know we don't know1 -
bristolleedsfan said:Bendo said:. The only reason it has an end date is to work around the price cap.I've no desire to read the various conditions but Octopus reasoning is it needs an end term to avoid being subject to price cap. To qualify for EPG, they had to remove the end term.Whether their interpretation is correct, no idea.1
-
Whatever the reason Octopus give for reviewing / rationalising / increasing their tariff and regardless how much we'd all prefer they didn't I don't really think anyone can fairly argue that it's unreasonable for them to do so.It's always been clear that this is a beta tariff - i.e. new and not fully tested - so fair game for them to change things in the light of testing. And common sense should say that in a time of high inflation the fixed element will need to be increased at some time to reflect rising costs. And difficult to justify having lower standing charges. So personally I've no objection to the principle of a price hike. Octopus smart tariffs are still some of the best value tariffs around.Also, there's no point in getting hot under the collar about notice periods etc.. Octopus have always been reasonable in the past and there's no reason I can think of to suggest it will be any different now. The time to worry about unreasonable notice periods is if and when it happens.Price rises are a fact of life - best just suck it up IMHO. And if it makes Tracker unattractive it's always possible to move without notice or penalty.5
-
bristolleedsfan said:Bendo said:. The only reason it has an end date is to work around the price cap.2
-
Griffindog said:bristolleedsfan said:Bendo said:. The only reason it has an end date is to work around the price cap.
0 -
Griffindog said:
bristolleedsfan said:Bendo said:. The only reason it has an end date is to work around the price cap.
0 -
I am.fairly relaxed about the new formula.proposal but have noticed some areas are +1p and others are +4p.
Those regions on +4p and the predictions for electricity prices next year could mean tracker becomes a regional product.
Maybe Octopus have not weighted the formula properly or maybe I am missing something.1 -
Prior to pricing changes I think I am correct that London had cheapest SC as well as one of the lowest (if not lowest) unit rate, December 2023 version has seen London unit rate increase by more than most other regions.1
-
MultiFuelBurner said:I am.fairly relaxed about the new formula.proposal but have noticed some areas are +1p and others are +4p.
Those regions on +4p and the predictions for electricity prices next year could mean tracker becomes a regional product.
Maybe Octopus have not weighted the formula properly or maybe I am missing something.An interesting observation. Looking at both sets of formulae, there is a slight increase in the spread for constant added on to the rate, which has gone up from a 1.5p range to a 1.8p range (the relative standard deviation has increased from 5.9% to 6.1%). London has gone from the second cheapest to second most expensive. NW and East of England have also gone from towards the cheaper end to towards the more expensive end. Some others have gone from lower-middle to upper-middle. In terms of the wholesale rate multiplier, this remains at a 0.8% RSD with only tiny tweaks made in the last decimal places.In terms of the final unit rate, the spread has gone up from about 1.6p to 1.9p, so I don't think that would make Tracker significantly less attractive in any specific region (I dare say the regional differences in SVT are aligned with these differences too). The main thing that has happened is that the relative price ranking of each region has shifted around. Yorkshire is now clear cheapest (after being neck and neck with London) and Merseyside+N Wales remains most expensive.2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards