2017 Capital Car Park Control PCN, DCB Legal now following up

beamerguy

Seemslegitium said:

blackdog2220 said:

also I dont see a bunch of follow up / threat letters 

If i'm honest, all of the letters he sent me (excluding the responses to my appeals! and my appeals themselves!) are in the SAR - he went quiet in late 2017, presumably he got my response to his chase letters in which I threatened to file a harassment case. All quiet until a month ago when I got letters from DCBL, and now with letters from DCB Legal.

beamerguy said:

Jenni_D said:

I edited my post as you were replying.   I think the nudge as you've posted it isn't forceful enough - it doesn't properly convey the discrepancy.

I agree

The public do not realise that the BPA is licenced by government as an ATA
Just like James Bond has a licence to kill, that can be revoked anytime
The BPA should come clean on this very quickly.  Something is being hidden by the BPA.  They have either made a gross error or they have been been duped. If it's the latter then there is only one option open to them

I'll let you know what the BPA says, and we can get a strong response together to show them how crooked CCPC are.

They already know ?

Seemslegitium

beamerguy said:

Seemslegitium said:

blackdog2220 said:

also I dont see a bunch of follow up / threat letters 

If i'm honest, all of the letters he sent me (excluding the responses to my appeals! and my appeals themselves!) are in the SAR - he went quiet in late 2017, presumably he got my response to his chase letters in which I threatened to file a harassment case. All quiet until a month ago when I got letters from DCBL, and now with letters from DCB Legal.

beamerguy said:

Jenni_D said:

I edited my post as you were replying.   I think the nudge as you've posted it isn't forceful enough - it doesn't properly convey the discrepancy.

I agree

The public do not realise that the BPA is licenced by government as an ATA
Just like James Bond has a licence to kill, that can be revoked anytime
The BPA should come clean on this very quickly.  Something is being hidden by the BPA.  They have either made a gross error or they have been been duped. If it's the latter then there is only one option open to them

I'll let you know what the BPA says, and we can get a strong response together to show them how crooked CCPC are.

They already know ?

I submitted a complaint to the BPA, in hopes that they can weigh in on this case as CCPC failed to meet the standards set out in the BPA CoP, and is trying to hold myself (the keeper) liable without standing to do so.
Hopefully I get a response in the next week!

blackdog2220

the "entity" used paper access to the DVLA , they are not showing on KADOe listings , do you actually think he paid £2.50 when he was writing NTK out 5 times 
I suggested earlier , either on your post or another to contact the DVLA and ask who and when your details were asked , in case of paper enquiry , you will get photocopy of his requests , at which point you can see company name ico number , but will you see 5 (is it) or just the first one , why waste money , same place same car  as a sole trader Mr terry towel cannot just liquidate himself , so is open for the dvla to fime him if he has cheated them , as sole director of new company , they may just deny him access with his new name , this then passes to BPA who must then take action 

get on to the DVLA for that info 

beamerguy

Seemslegitium said:

beamerguy said:

Seemslegitium said:

blackdog2220 said:

also I dont see a bunch of follow up / threat letters 

If i'm honest, all of the letters he sent me (excluding the responses to my appeals! and my appeals themselves!) are in the SAR - he went quiet in late 2017, presumably he got my response to his chase letters in which I threatened to file a harassment case. All quiet until a month ago when I got letters from DCBL, and now with letters from DCB Legal.

beamerguy said:

Jenni_D said:

I edited my post as you were replying.   I think the nudge as you've posted it isn't forceful enough - it doesn't properly convey the discrepancy.

I agree

The public do not realise that the BPA is licenced by government as an ATA
Just like James Bond has a licence to kill, that can be revoked anytime
The BPA should come clean on this very quickly.  Something is being hidden by the BPA.  They have either made a gross error or they have been been duped. If it's the latter then there is only one option open to them

I'll let you know what the BPA says, and we can get a strong response together to show them how crooked CCPC are.

They already know ?

I submitted a complaint to the BPA, in hopes that they can weigh in on this case as CCPC failed to meet the standards set out in the BPA CoP, and is trying to hold myself (the keeper) liable without standing to do so.
Hopefully I get a response in the next week!

We will see, the BPA are well known for fob offs ......  I think this now demands a proper reply 
Remember this issue can be taken much higher than the BPA

The BPA need to explain how a company only registered in Aug 2020 were a member back in 2009 ???

blackdog2220

I submitted a complaint to the BPA, in hopes that they can weigh in on this case as CCPC failed to meet the standards set out in the BPA CoP, and is trying to hold myself (the keeper) liable without standing to do so.
Hopefully I get a response in the next week!

to all intents the prerson that issued your tickets is no longer a BPA Aos member , so it is doughtful if they can actually do anything REGARDING YOUR CASE

however in other cases he has used the Ltd companys name to chase up the earlier T/A claims , this i believe is what the BPA should aim for and sanction accordingly , you just need the POPLa appeals , one by one costing him £25 (+vat) each , and hope he and dcbl crawl back in there little holes 

beamerguy

There is always the case of compensation from the BPA for all those who paid up

blackdog2220

hang on , are you saying that the BPA are responsable for it members , past and present , careful with your answer as I am drinking coffee

beamerguy

and hope he and dcbl crawl back in there little holes

Surely you understand that DCBL are already in that hole.  
A robo claimer who sends out mail bombs on a whim does not know anything about what they are chasing
You watch ... for those they select to take to court DCBL will be spanked

DCBL dug that hole when they decided to act as idiots, feel sorry for them

Umkomaas

beamerguy said:

Umkomaas said:

The public do not realise that the BPA is licenced by government as an ATA

Accredited Trade Association status is awarded by the DVLA, the Government is not involved. 

An agent of the government  so it implicates the DVLA

Eh?  We need to deal in facts here. One can't just draw convenient implications. This thread (and others) is flailing around with all sorts of assumptions, 'legal' assertions, company law 'definitions', with little to back up statements. We cannot send unwary newbies off on wild goose chases to sate the dreams, aspirations and imaginations of those without any personal risk in these case(s).

beamerguy

blackdog2220 said:

hang on , are you saying that the BPA are responsable for it members , past and present , careful with your answer as I am drinking coffee

Well I'm drinking a whisky ...... the BPA have a responsibility to the public to ensure their members are genuine ..... everything you say points otherwise