We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
BITCOIN
Options
Comments
-
underground99 said:Notepad_Phil said:darren232002 said:Notepad_Phil said:In the post I was replying to you said that banning bitcoin was impossible due to technical considerations. All I can see in your post are observations that you believe make it difficult to do but nothing which would make it definitively impossible. So are there technical considerations that would make it impossible or is it just a case of it being difficult to do?I had thought that there was some aspect of BTC that you were aware of that made it truly impossible, but if that's all you've got then I'd say that impossible is much too strong a word.Anyway I doubt that any government would ever try to ban bitcoin or any of the legitimate cryptos, so I hope your dealings with crypto continue with success .
If you banned all the legitimate banks from sending money to and from BTC exchanges you would make it very difficult for lay people to move money from cash to BTC without some effort, and it would become more niche. But without cash you could still freely exchange other things for BTC (such as other crypto, or gold, or black market goods, or favours on some sort of barter system, or perhaps units of an ETF that holds a known basket of public shares, etc etc). Driving the system underground would make the coins less valuable due to reduced demand from retail investors if that downtick wasn't replaced with some other source of demand, but it is perhaps something that a government would prefer to regulate (e.g. regulating the cash-to-crypto exchanges for anti-money laundering rules etc) rather than just have the system end up as something entirely unregulated that's great for trading favours between organised crime gangs.
So you could try to ban it, just like you can try to ban people greeting each other with 'hello' in the street and tell them they must say 'good morning' instead, but it is hard to enforce such a ban because people will do what they want, just a bit more quietly or in a different way to subvert the rules. Once the genie is out of the bottle it is hard to make him go back in if he doesn't want to.0 -
Notepad_Phil said:underground99 said:Notepad_Phil said:darren232002 said:Notepad_Phil said:In the post I was replying to you said that banning bitcoin was impossible due to technical considerations. All I can see in your post are observations that you believe make it difficult to do but nothing which would make it definitively impossible. So are there technical considerations that would make it impossible or is it just a case of it being difficult to do?I had thought that there was some aspect of BTC that you were aware of that made it truly impossible, but if that's all you've got then I'd say that impossible is much too strong a word.Anyway I doubt that any government would ever try to ban bitcoin or any of the legitimate cryptos, so I hope your dealings with crypto continue with success .
If you banned all the legitimate banks from sending money to and from BTC exchanges you would make it very difficult for lay people to move money from cash to BTC without some effort, and it would become more niche. But without cash you could still freely exchange other things for BTC (such as other crypto, or gold, or black market goods, or favours on some sort of barter system, or perhaps units of an ETF that holds a known basket of public shares, etc etc). Driving the system underground would make the coins less valuable due to reduced demand from retail investors if that downtick wasn't replaced with some other source of demand, but it is perhaps something that a government would prefer to regulate (e.g. regulating the cash-to-crypto exchanges for anti-money laundering rules etc) rather than just have the system end up as something entirely unregulated that's great for trading favours between organised crime gangs.
So you could try to ban it, just like you can try to ban people greeting each other with 'hello' in the street and tell them they must say 'good morning' instead, but it is hard to enforce such a ban because people will do what they want, just a bit more quietly or in a different way to subvert the rules. Once the genie is out of the bottle it is hard to make him go back in if he doesn't want to.Turkey is having a good think about it right now with 'new rules' to be announced any time now:Looks like they might be pulling back from an outright ban for now.
0 -
wilding45 said:I wanted to try Bitcoin trading and deposited 350 euro with a broker. I could not even access the site to give instructions and noticed that the firm was not fsa regulated for UK trading. I requested a refund , to no effect. I was not worried as I had paid by credit card and asked for a chargeback.....their response was no chargeback and no section 75 because a cryptocurrency is involved. I will let you know how I get on at the ombudsman.
0 -
deejaybee said:So no ID checks with Swissport Scott ?
It's not ID checks that's the problem, it's the time it takes for the onboarding to be completed. Coinbase support is notoriously awful too. Swissborg's is all done via in-app tech, shouldn't take more than a few mins. Similar to say N26, I opened a full bank account there the other day whilst sat in the car, in about 5 mins.
There's also plenty of decentralised exchanges (DEXs) where you dont submit any KYC too but that's a whole different ball game to be looked at further down the line.1 -
Notepad_Phil said:underground99 said:Notepad_Phil said:darren232002 said:Notepad_Phil said:In the post I was replying to you said that banning bitcoin was impossible due to technical considerations. All I can see in your post are observations that you believe make it difficult to do but nothing which would make it definitively impossible. So are there technical considerations that would make it impossible or is it just a case of it being difficult to do?I had thought that there was some aspect of BTC that you were aware of that made it truly impossible, but if that's all you've got then I'd say that impossible is much too strong a word.Anyway I doubt that any government would ever try to ban bitcoin or any of the legitimate cryptos, so I hope your dealings with crypto continue with success .
If you banned all the legitimate banks from sending money to and from BTC exchanges you would make it very difficult for lay people to move money from cash to BTC without some effort, and it would become more niche. But without cash you could still freely exchange other things for BTC (such as other crypto, or gold, or black market goods, or favours on some sort of barter system, or perhaps units of an ETF that holds a known basket of public shares, etc etc). Driving the system underground would make the coins less valuable due to reduced demand from retail investors if that downtick wasn't replaced with some other source of demand, but it is perhaps something that a government would prefer to regulate (e.g. regulating the cash-to-crypto exchanges for anti-money laundering rules etc) rather than just have the system end up as something entirely unregulated that's great for trading favours between organised crime gangs.
So you could try to ban it, just like you can try to ban people greeting each other with 'hello' in the street and tell them they must say 'good morning' instead, but it is hard to enforce such a ban because people will do what they want, just a bit more quietly or in a different way to subvert the rules. Once the genie is out of the bottle it is hard to make him go back in if he doesn't want to.Speculators becoming weary of Elon's nonsense:
0 -
underground99 said:Last year on the thread, Patient was saying he had cashed out amounts that were 'dozens of times more' than what he had invested, and this weekend he's mentioned making profits 'thousands of times over'. In that context, the number of 'times' can refer to a multiple on the initial investment rather than specifically meaning that number of trades. If you invest a fiver when it's at $50 or $500 and sell when it's at $50,000, there's 100x or 1000x return just from tucking them away - it doesn't really mean that he entered into transactions thousands of times. So perhaps he was patient and held from $20 to $20000 before giving up work in 2017.
0 -
Sorted my coinbase verification now.... used the Mrs's Ipad to take clearer pics, as scanning stuff via my printer wasnt good enough..
1 -
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/11/palantir-pltr-q1-2021-earnings.html
Considering adding BTC to balance sheet. Peter Thiel has always been a bull, but still. "Considering" is different to doing thoughSuspect we will see more of this. Quarterly filings will be interesting for a lot of large companies over the next 6 months I suspect.
0 -
P1 said:https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/11/palantir-pltr-q1-2021-earnings.html
Considering adding BTC to balance sheet. Peter Thiel has always been a bull, but still. "Considering" is different to doing thoughSuspect we will see more of this. Quarterly filings will be interesting for a lot of large companies over the next 6 months I suspect.
0 -
I'm currently having an issue trying to move ETH from Coinbase Wallet to Coinbase (will then move to Pro) to take some profit and trade. Has been pending for 30 hours + so have had to contact support. Want to buy some more BTC as I think its soon to do some upward growth.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards